Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live

Movement type 101 Q is not planned. (Entry is not copied over)

$
0
0

Hello All,

 

I am getting this error, when i am doing GR with 101 movement type and special indicator Q = Project


Error:


Movement type 101 Q is not planned. (Entry is not copied over)

Message no. MIGO057

 

In PO, i have taken account assignment Category as P =  project. In OMJJ transaction code for movement type 101, i have maintained LIS statistics group combination of 101 and Q

 

I have refereed many thread. But in this thread

 

Movement type 101 Q is not planned. (Entry is not copied over)


I have one doubt, If i need to use Special indicator Q in GR, PO Account assignment should it be blank.

 

Kindly help me out to proceed further.

 

Regards,

 

Manoj


Issue with PR release processing status

$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

I have an issue in production system where release processing status(EBAN-BANPR) is showing as '03 - in release' eventhough PR is released using ME54N,

 

Because of this issue, the released PR is not showing up in ME5A report and not able to convert to PO

 

Please help on this

 

Thanks

Rajesh Rajagopal

Product Hierarchy in Material Master

$
0
0

Does anyone know if there are any problems in not maintaining translations in the product hierarchy table?

 

If yes can you please tell me what they are?

 

Also please let me know if there is any way to mass update translation for product hierarchy? I have a couple of hundred.

While printing service PO "items partially delivered"is displayed even after full procurement is done

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am doing a service PO and I have done procurement for the full quantity.But when I go the PO and see the print preview it still shows "items partially delivered" in print preview even after the full quantities has been delivered.But in case of normal PO without services,I can see the print preview as "items completely delivered" when full procurement is done.

 

Can anyone help me and give me a solution how to resolve this issue?

 

For example,I have done a service PO for 38 quantities and I have also done procurement for the full quantity(38 quantities).But when I go the PO and see the print preview it still shows "items partially delivered" in print preview even after the full quantities has been delivered.

 

Can anyone help me and give me a solution how to resolve this issue?

FIFO Valuation in real time

$
0
0

Dear all,

 

Requirement is,

1.Materials should be valuated by FIFO in real-time basis and NOT during period end or Year end.

2.FIFO Valuated price should be updated for all the materials issued so far.

3.All the current stocks should be valuated under FIFO.

 

In the present system, the materials are valuated by MAP.

Kindly Suggest

How to fulfill this requirement?

What could be the challenges faced as system has gone live already.


Expecting your valuable suggestions.


Regards

Krishna

Customer master text into PO header text

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have a requirement where in we need to have text copied from Customer master into PO header text area. This is required only in STO scenario.

Could you pls guide me how to achieve this ?

 

 

Best Regards,

Anil


KI222 during MIRO

$
0
0

I have created a good movement on a cost center with validity date 31.12.2013.

When I created invoice with MIRO, a message error KI222 blocked registration.

I cannot modify validity date in cost center, can I bypass the error during MIRO?

Thanks all

MB53

$
0
0

Dear MM Experts

 

This screenshot shows all the fields that I need for my processing:

 

f.JPG

If not clear these are the fields:

 

SLoc Batch        Unrestricted use  Sales order unre.       Sales orders           Reserved  Schd.for delivery   Rcpt reservation     On-Order Stock   Min safety stock

 

Is it possible to get the same list not for an only one material but for all the plant materials?

 

Thanks

 

negup


Firm trade zone calculated from delivery date or creation date

$
0
0

Hello, we are considering the utilization of firm/trade off zones for two reasons: ability to use statisical date functionality in Scheduling agreements (work around in place..but works similar to a PO if this is used as we understand) and to be able to measure accountability of cost of material when changes occur.

 

Can you help me understand why these dates are calculated off of the creation date, and not the delivery date: for example I would have thought it would take the delivery date, less lead time, then back out 60-90 days as teh trade off zone rather than from the creation date.

 

Example : if the SA was created on Jan 1, and delivery is June 1, and if the firm trade zone is 30 days, I would assume it would note May 2nd (less leadtime) , not January 31st, but from what I am initially  understanding when reading the SAP provided instructions, this is created off of the SA creation date.

 

Do I understand this correctly?

 

Thanks in advance.


PR release strategy without classification

$
0
0

Hello Gurus,

 

How do I change the values in PR release strategy without classification  .

I just want to change the values in field " value of purchase requisition" .

" You can delete the existing combination line and recreate a new combination line with NEW value" is this the only option ???

Apologies my previous entry was removed by SCN

Payment block in vendor invoice using Idoc

$
0
0

Hi ,

 

I have requirment as given below.

 

Please let me know the tolerance keys which i need to use with the upper and lower limit value details.

 

Scenario 1:

 

PO has ordered qty as 10, there is no GR. Invoice with 1 qty is getting posted through idoc. Invoice should get posted with payment block

 

Scenario 2:

 

PO has ordered qty as 99999, only one gr with qty 1 is posted. Invoice with 5 qty is getting posted through idoc . Invoice should get posted with payment block

 

I have already configured the DQ and DW for this,

 

DQ:

 

Upper limit as 1.00-   ( its like -1.00)

 

Lower limit as 1.00-   ( its like -1.00)

 

 

DW:

 

Upper limit as 1.00

 

But it dint worked for scenario 1.

 

Please provide your solutions.

 

Thanks

CC

Plant block

$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

I want to block a plant for all transactions related to MM, FI, SD & PP? Please let me know

Reason for movement (MSEG-GRUND) in MIGO Cancellation

$
0
0

Is is possible to ajust settings or use BADI so that when executing a Cancellation of a document via MIGO, the "Reason for movement" field (MSEG-GRUND) is copied form the reference document to be cancelled ?

GR Blocked Stock in ME2N

$
0
0

Hi,

 

In the report ME2N, the gr blocked stock for a PO using movement type 103 is considered as delivered quantity.

 

Example:

 

PO Quantity = 100 KG

GR (103 movement ) = 20 Kg

 

In ME2N, with selection parameter as WE101, the report will show "To be delivered quantity" as 100-20 = 80 Kg.

 

But in my case, I need the system not to consider the GR blocked stock as delivered quantity and only the movement type 101 or 105 should be considered as delivered quantity.

 

In ME2N, with selection parameter as WE101, the report should show "To be delivered quantity" as 100-0 = 100 Kg.

 

Is this possible in the system by any ways?

 

I tried with the config settings of the selection parameter in SPRO but in vain.

 

Also if possible please shed some light on the usage of the field Blkd Stock in the config settings of the selection parameter WE101 under Materials Management--> Purchasing--> Reporting--> Maintain Purchasing Lists--> Selection Parameters--->Define Selection Parameters.

 

I thought unchecking this field would help my case but it didn't. I suppose it is actually for the selection of the purchasing documents to be listed and not for the calculation of the "To be delivered quantity" in the report.

 

 

Regards

Raja.....

KANBAN for external procurement process

$
0
0

Hello,

 

This is regarding the KANBAN for external procurement process. I want to create the control cycle with replenishment strategy "External procurement with scheduling agreement". It is provided by standard SAP. It is also assignend to the plant for which i required. everything is fine but when i tried to create control cycle, i did not get the same option there, i did get only two options 1)container control 2)Summerized JIT call.

 

Pls help me to resolve the problem.

 

Answer will be rewarded.

 

Regards,

 

Subhash


No plant specific data exists

$
0
0

Dear all

For one finished material, in T-code mm02 , it is giving message like NO PLANT SPECIFIC DATA EXISTS  while going through sales views only(for other views like basic data ect there is no such message) despite maintaining all the data

 

why this message is comming

 

Message no. M3245

 

Edited by: GB BL on Apr 18, 2008 9:07 AM

Net Weight of Alt UOM

$
0
0

Hi

 

I wan to calculate New Weight of Alt. Uom. Is this information Stored any of the table? Or it is calculated information?

My Example.

 

Base Unit of Measure = Ea

 

Net Weight = 2.5 KG

 

Alternate UOM = Pallate

 

Conversion factor = 1 Pallate = 100 EA

 

Hence net weight of 1 Pallate will be 100 * 2.5 = 250 KG.

 

Is the net weight 250 KG stored in any table? If yes, what is the table/field name?

 

Thank you

Shai

Cycle Count Planned Date

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Please when we run MICN some of the items' planned count date are in red and in the past as there was no count,

is there a way we can actually correct this?

 

Regards,

Joel

Generate outbound Idoc for invoice posted in MIRO

$
0
0

Dear all,

 

We have a scenario where in the invoice is manually entered in MIRO by FI team. The team wants an Idoc to be triggered when invoice is posted in MIRO.

 

Any suggestions on how the we can achieve the functionality.

 

thanks,

mahesh.

BOM lost after assign to new plant

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We had been assigned a new plant to a BOM with refer to the existing plant of the BOM (tcode: CS07). And also we compared both plants of the BOM successfully (tcode: CS14), but the BOM of new plant had suddenly lost afterwards. Is anyone know what's the problem? Or anyone try this issue before?

 

Rdgs,
Emily

Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>