Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Quota arrangement splitting issue

December 22, 2015, 9:52 am
$
0
0

Hi

Quota Arrangement – splitting issue (SAP 4.6b)

 

We have an item with 2 different vendors.  We want MRP to allocate the equal quantity to both the vendors.  I did the following settings:

  1. Created Quota arrangement for the two vendors of equal % ( 50 + 50).
  2. Maintained Quota arrangement usage 3 in MRP 2 view.
  3. Maintained Source List with MRP relevant setting as 1
  4. Other settings screen captures are also given below. 

 

When we run MRP, system always proposes to first vendor assigned correctly based on the quota arrangement, but its not picked up the second vendor even though we maintained all the above settings.

 

We expect that the system to generate two Purchase Requisitions, however, the system only creates one requisition that was sourced it to the first vendor in the Quota Management. Is there any way this ca be achieved or please let us know what settings missing here?

 

Appreciate your help in advance.

 

Thanks

Maglr

↧
Search

How to reduce the idle materials generated by the rounding value

December 16, 2015, 11:00 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Our factories generates many idle materials because in the each purchase the materials will be purchased based on the rounding value. Now we have six factories, and each factory have the same situation. So we hope to find a way to reduce these idle materials.

 

 

Do you have the familiar situation? Would you mind sharing with us your solution?

 

 

We really need your help, please.

 

 

 

Best Regards

Kevin Lai

↧
↧

SR based IV field in Item details of Contract

December 22, 2015, 3:28 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

 

I have issue in contract creation,I am creating a Material contract and Service contract below are observations-

 

  1. For Service contract “SR based IV” field in the item details is ticked independent of the settings in vendor master.

   2. In case of   Material contract “SR based IV” field is untick .

 

I checked with both settings in vendor master purchasing view Tick and Untick.

I checked for item category D but this SR based IV field does not maintained in item category D.

 

As per my knowledge “SR based IV” field comes in contract from vendor master.

 

Is there any other way for “SR base IV” field  to over right for service contract in case vendor whose vendor master does not have a  SR base IV ticked in Purchasing view?

 

Also Please explain for Material contract why SR based IV is not by default mandatory term in contract?

↧

Inventory posting for GR 101 101 E

December 22, 2015, 11:49 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

I got the requirement from client as Purchase order related GR for common stock and special stock (Sales order) wanted post into different GL Account.

 

For example:

 

Material  123-456,  valuation class 1000

GR  from PO with movement type 101:  FI Posting as D: 1300100  C: GR/IR

GR from PO with movement type 101 E : FI Posting as D:1300200 C: GR/IR

 

Currently, the Inventory posting for 101/101E always like  D: BSX C: WRX

 

I checked the OMWN Settings,

OMWN.jpg

Is there any settings I could make the inventory posting for 101 / 101E assign to different GL Account?

Thank you.

↧

Difference in GR IR Value due to wrong invoiving

December 23, 2015, 12:31 am
$
0
0

HI Experts,

 

I have 2 questions to ask

 

1) Client has created a PO for Qty 10 ea at pricing $ 10 ea. He has done a GR for 10 Qty and the GR value comes to $ 100 which is fine. Now the invoicing is done with the amount $90. Thus leading to mismatch in GR and IR value.

 

In this we have suggested to reverse the current invoice & take the proper invoice of $ 100 from vendor and respost the same or share the credit note of $10 towards the vendor.

 

What could be the appropriate way of handling the above scenario.

 

2) Similar to above scenario, Client has created a PO for Qty 10 ea at pricing $ 10 ea. He has done a GR for 8 Qty and the GR value comes to $ 80 which is fine, now the user change the PO price in between to $20 now the next 2 qty is GR at the value at $40. Now the total GR amount comes to

 

GR Qty - 10 Qty

GR Value - $120

 

If i look at Invoice value it is calculated with the $ 20 and it is coming to Invoice Qty - 10 ea and the value is coming to $ 200. thus leading to GR IR price mismatch.

 

Now the client is asking to match the GR IR value for the PO's with above scenario.

 

Require some experts advice on this above scenario.

 

Thanks in advance.

↧
↧

Has anyone created a custom transaction to mirror MI09 to enable RF functionality?

December 23, 2015, 7:03 am
$
0
0

I am reaching out to see if anyone has created a custom transaction to mirror MI09 to enable RF functionality.  I am working with a client where I am setting up Inventory Counting processes in IM.  We are looking for the ability to take an RF device and scan a SLOC bar-code, scan the material bar-code and enter the count of the material.  The inventory count document will be automatically created (mirror of MI09)  If the physical count matches what is in SAP, the document should be posted and cleared.  Has anyone set up this type of functionality?  If yes, any guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks,

Chaz

↧

Service procurement - GR/IR - hitting in different GL in MIRO

June 3, 2015, 10:55 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have created a material type common for both material and services which is ZCRV. Our procurement process is against project - account assignment - P against WBS.


Valuation class for material is 6100, For services it is 6200.


In OBYC settings, we have given for material - GBB - VBR - 6100 - 752000000 (both debit and credit).

For services it is GBB - VBR - 6200 - 752000100 (both debit and credit).


We have assigned  WRX - 6100 - 213990800 (both debit and credit).

WRX - 6200 - 213990800 (both debit and credit).


 

Issue:

 

For material procurement, both MIGO and MIRO GL entries are hitting correctly for GR/IR

But for service procurement, MIGO is hitting the correct GL 213990800 but MIRO is hitting different GL 213990100

 

Please help in resolving the issue.

↧

Standard Report to update the Actual GI date in Delivery

December 23, 2015, 5:50 am
$
0
0

Hi ,

 

Is there any standard report to update the Actual GI date in delivery.

 

 

Regards,

Sanjay Singh

+91-9717792907

↧
Search

Serial Numbers does not get updated to Material document after PGI

December 17, 2015, 10:30 am
$
0
0

Hello Experts,

Please advice if any one has come across this issue. I tried searching SDN and also SAP notes regarding the same but unable to get an answer. My client is on SAP ECC 6.0 and release 605.

We have an issue at my client. They sell filled gas to the customer in a cylinder. The cylinder is returned back to the client. These cylinders are tracked based on serial numbers which are manually created in the system using transaction IQ01.

1) Serial Numbers are manually created in the system using transaction IQ01 for a particular material. The serial number status is AVLB when created.

2) Quantity posting equal to the serial numbers created in done in the system, so that stock and serial numbers remain inconsistent. This set up is based on the serial number profile maintained in OIS2. The serial number status changes to ESTO.

Inline image 1

3) The procedures included in the serial number profile are as below:

Inline image 2

4) Sales order is created in the system to send the packaging material to the customer. Sales order type "OR"

5) Delivery is created with reference to sales order for the packing material.

6) Serial numbers are entered in the delivery before PGI.

7) The serial number status gets updated to "EDEL ESTO" - Assigned to delivery and in warehouse as soon as it is assigned to the delivery.

8) Once the picking is done, PGI is done for the delivery. When PGI is done, the system does not update the serial number status to "ECUS ESTO" - Delivered to customer, also the material document created does not contain the serial number which was goods issued.

- The outbound delivery does display the serial number but this does not get copied to the material document created after PGI.

- Material document created:

Capture.PNG

- When I click on item and GOTO-Serial Number, I get the following message "No serial number created for material"

Capture.PNG

- Serial Number status remains EDEL ESTO also special stock indicator does not get "V". Sales data does not get copied to the serial number.

Also serial number history ONLY displays the Outbound delivery number and does not display the material document created after PGI.

Capture.PNG

Serial Number History

Capture.PNG

↧
↧

system is stopping Vendor Return Saying Delivery Completion has been done for this line item

December 23, 2015, 2:40 am
$
0
0

Dear All SAP Gurs;

 

I am encountering one problem ;the scenario is as below :

 

 

1) I have Created one PO with 100 QTY .

 

2) Received 100 QTY in unrestricted stock .

 

3) Now Due to some reason I want to send it back to vendor and I am using MIGO  and "Vendor Return" -"Material Document" .

 

 

But Now system is showing the Error Message " Delivery Completion has been done for this line item"

 

 

 

 

 

Why system is stopping to return the goods ,PO DCI should not have any control in the Vendor Return ,When ever I am Removing the DCI  tick mark then system is allowing to do vendor Return .

 

Please Help Me in this issue .

 

Best Regards;

Joydeep Mukherjee

S0007336004

↧

M7181 Error - Only 0 no. available while creating GR

December 23, 2015, 4:59 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have created a Return PO for a material. If I'm creating GR against that PO using Mov type 101 or 161, It is showing the error M7181. i.e 0 stock available. But if I'm checking with MMBE, MD04 and all, it is showing the stock in Unrestricted use.

 

If I'm trying to do reset availability check using COHV, it is showing "There is no data for the selection".

 

Note :

 

Material is a batch material. It is clearly showing the stock under batch in MMBE.

 

What may be the issue..?

↧

Kanban Scheduling agreement MM

December 24, 2015, 5:06 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am facing an issue regarding the use of kanban functionality for procurement, by using an MM Scheduling agreement.

 

In my scenario I have created 3 cards in my control cycle. 2 cards are full and 1 card is empty. I would like to set the empty card as full.

 

One scheduline line with an open quantity of 10 each appears (to be received) in my scheduling agreement.

 

So normally if I set the kanban to full the open shedule line should disappear in my SA. And the goods receipt should take place.

 

But It's not the case. When I set the kanban as full, It becomes green but no goods receipt done and the sheduline of 10 each is still open.

 

I think the issue is due to the fact that there is no link between the kanban number and the sheduling agreement when I check in the T-code PK31 (see below). How can I solve this issue ??? I would like to update the replenishment element in the T-code PK31. But the system does not allow me !!!

 

Thanks for your help

 

Regrads

 

Corentin

 

KANBAN CARDSgif.gif

 

KANBAN SA.gif

 

2015-12-24_13-59-52.gif

↧

Quota arrangement splitting issue

December 22, 2015, 9:52 am
$
0
0

Hi

Quota Arrangement – splitting issue (SAP 4.6b)

 

We have an item with 2 different vendors.  We want MRP to allocate the equal quantity to both the vendors.  I did the following settings:

  1. Created Quota arrangement for the two vendors of equal % ( 50 + 50).
  2. Maintained Quota arrangement usage 3 in MRP 2 view.
  3. Maintained Source List with MRP relevant setting as 1
  4. Other settings screen captures are also given below. 

 

When we run MRP, system always proposes to first vendor assigned correctly based on the quota arrangement, but its not picked up the second vendor even though we maintained all the above settings.

 

We expect that the system to generate two Purchase Requisitions, however, the system only creates one requisition that was sourced it to the first vendor in the Quota Management. Is there any way this ca be achieved or please let us know what settings missing here?

 

Appreciate your help in advance.

 

Thanks

Maglr

↧
↧

double delivery created for STO

December 16, 2015, 1:39 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am facing the problem that we have a STO with quantity 1 ,but there are two delivery created for 1 quantity each.

 

please suggest me how the system creates two delivery.

 

 

Regards,

Sanjay Singh

↧

Unusual situation during MIR6 invoice posting after EHP 7

December 6, 2015, 8:26 pm
$
0
0

                            After EHP 7 upgrade we are facing an unusual fact that if any person parks a document using tcode mir7 , system suggests that amount to be parked is Rs 15334.67 and the user parks the document with the same amount for posting. Then the user posting the same document is not able to do so if he tries to round off the amount to next rupee. E.g. 15334.67 round ed off to 15335.

 

System gives an error   ' Carry forward level cannot be transferred from invoice reference.'.

 

Now if the person parking the document rounds off the same document,parks with Rs 15335 and send it for posting. The person allowed for posting is able to post the same document using MIR6. Now the issue is why the person posting is not able to round off the parked document as it is under his authority that rounding off has to be done or not.

 

Every time that user has to request person parking the document to round off the documents so that he is able to post the document.

 

Is SAP note 1930285 - Determining the carryforward level      to do anything with this issue.

↧
Search

STO batch number issue

December 24, 2015, 9:49 pm
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We failed to have GI against STO to bring it's batch number from the DN it belonged to.

 

We use Stock Transport Order with Delivery and Billing Document procedure, and 2 steps for receiving plant, which means 103 with 105.

Can someone guided us where we should check to make the receiving plant with the batch number from the DN directly?

 

Our batch level is currently material level.

 

regards,

Steven

↧

Is it possible?

December 25, 2015, 1:40 am
$
0
0

Hi SAP Friends,

 

   I wonder on viewing the material master view (MM03) of FERT Material, it seems the materials has both control. am confusing to understand the situation..

 

  And, on accounting entries, the valuation happening based on " S" price control value.

 

  The business process following " Costing Run " too, the support team saying that, Bcz of cost run, the price automatically saved in " V" view.. Is it true? or SAP Standard?

 

  How it could be possible for FERT material, kindly share the suggestion to over come it..

 

See the screen shot..

 

Inline image 2

↧
↧

ATP - STO - OBD

December 25, 2015, 9:03 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

Please we need your help in an issue related to ATP while goods issue to outbound delivery of STO, the issue is as following:

 

- First of all, our cycle starts with STO creation with availability check then release with automatic delivery creation and here is the allocation of the quantity "became reserved after delivery creation not STO creation"

 

- If we have two users created two STOs in the same storage location, the system propose same available quantity for both users during creation due to there is no STO released yet thus no delivery created "No allocation occurred".

 

- While release the STO the system will create delivery for both users with quantity requested, however, there is no available quantity for two users.

 

- Only one user can issue the quantity allocated and the second user cannot, and his delivery will be allocated on the whole plant level.

 

- No one can create STO/Sales order in any storage location if the quantity available in the requested storage location is less than the confirmed quantity on the plant level.

 

Some workarounds:

 

1- Delete the outbound delivery or adjust its quantity manually.

2- Test an enhancement to delete any delivery with quantity greater than ATP quantity.

 

In addition to that we are searching for standard solution to create the delivery with zero quantity if there is no enough ATP quantity, and please note that I tried to create the second outbound delivery manually and it's created with zero quantity but if it created automatically, the system create it with the requested quantity which means there is no availability check activated in the automatic creation.

 

So please guide us if you have any other recommended solution.

↧

Maintain calculation Schema

December 26, 2015, 6:32 am
$
0
0

Dears,

 

I am new to SAP mm , I am Practicing in SAP mm IDES demo version, while on maintaining the calculation schema i unfortunately deleted all SAP default calculation schema!

 

can any one help me out of this, how would i get back the SAP default calculation schema to my system ?

 

Also i defined RM0000 on my own with PB00 condition type but it is not working properly

 

 

 

 

Thanks in advance

↧

Unrelease PR after PO creation

December 26, 2015, 11:50 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

simply, is there a system message to prevent unrelease PR after PO created reference to this PR.

 

Thanks

↧
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
Search