Hi Gurus,
I'm executing forecast for a material with MRP type VV. The requiriment is to group 4 periods forecast in only one PR and no what its doing right now that is creating 4 PR for the next 4 periods.
The question is: is it possible? how do I do it?
I would appreciate your help.
Regards,
Jose
Experts, We are facing an issue with respect to security for Release strategy. Our PR release strategy has about 26 Release codes. The requirement is that 1. PR release be restricted by plant 2. PR create / change required for multiple plants Example : A user may have Release code ZA (for $5000 limit) assigned for Plant XYZ0 in security profile. So he can approve upto $5000 for XYZ0 in Tcode: ME54N. However he also has PR create and change security access for multiple plants (ABC0, XYZ0) under Tcode: ME51N/ME52N. However ME54N restriction by plant (XYZ0) is being overridden by ME52N Plant setting of * or (ABC0, XYZ0) Result is that Tcode ME55 or ME54N gives him access to approve Release code ZA not only for XYZ0 but also for other plants(ABC0). PS: Our release strategy configuration does not have plant as characteristic. Otherwise Release codes would multiply by26. That will be in excess of 300 Release codes. We do not want this as data maintenance becomes too much. Not feasible option Any thoughts from experts what may be wrong from Security standpoint or otherwise would be appreciated. Regards,
If the sale order qty is completely converted to PR , through MRP, still system allowing to create PR through MRP, please suggest me how to restrict this.
HI all,
Is there a way in which i can reverse a canceled ODO document? The problem is like this:
- I create an ODO document 123 in period 01
- I cancel the ODO document 123 in period 02, which is wrong, but the ODO document is already reversed
It was a pending transaction, in which there was a mistake in the input of posting date. What can be done?
I have posted in SD forum, but still can't find the solution for this.
Please kindly suggest
Thank you all very much in advance.
Regards, Erwin
Dear Gurus,
I was able to solve the same issue within ML81N and ME21N/ME22N/ME23N, but the same issue still persist within ME31K. I followed the instruction defined in snote 824911 by deleting table entries within T162V (please see below list)
VARIANTE SCR_POS SCRFNAME
Is there any particular note for the same Error Message in ME31K?
thank you in advance,
Dear All,
Currently the stock is updated in the batch in the returns stock. But while moving the returns stock to unrestricted use, we need the stock to be moved to a new batch. During stock movement, the batch characteristics value from the initial batch has to be copied to the new batch.
We have tried with the movement type 453, but the batch characteristics value from the initial batch are not copied to the new batch.
Hi all,
There is tolerance limits maintained in the system.
I want to see that how system calculate ST tolerance limit. Is there any function that I can debug and check easily.
By the way, I've a problem with ST key. At the initial entry, It is not blocking invoice, but when I press Simulate button and change date (after change, I'm reverting it back to original one), the traffic light becomes yellow and says "correct but blocked". This is true. But on the initial entry, the tolerance key ST is not taking into condideration as per my understanding. So I'm trying to find out what is the missing point here.
Thanks for your answers.
hello all
we are starting to use a consignment process that should work as follows:
1) creation of FO order based on Purchasing consignment inforecord
2) GR of partial quantity of the FO every time material arrives and it is transferred to Sloc
3) GI of material when needed
4) sttlement of used material with MRKO
the problem we encounter is that at no stage, a control/approval is made for this material;
the PO is consignment and therefore it has no value: the value is determined at GR only, from consignment inforecord.
the GR has no release strategy possible.
transaction MRKO books the amounts and even if we use it to display material not settled, it does not require any approval nor release in order to be booked.
Any idea on how I can have an approval, workflow or something of the sort that would block the booking in MRKO until it is not done?
thanks
Dear experts,
PO was created for 5200 GBP and IR was posted for 5200 GBP but the GRN value shows as 1000 GBP.Its not equal to IR price.Any idea why the value is 1000 GBP.
Invoice was posted before GR.
1.PO created - 01.10.2015 - 5200 GBP
2.Invoice posted - 01.10.2015 - 5200 GBP
3.GRN posted - 14.10.2015 - 1000 GBP
Vendor currency is GBP.
Regards....
Dear SAP Experts,
I meet the error message number: ME062 when creating Purchase Order.
I searched the relevant solution from SCN and Notes, they always said the root cause is about Quantity/value updating of material type(T-code: OMS2), but the configuration is no problem(please see the screenshot for details), and I just copied the material number from a normal material, and I just changed the valuation class, this is the only difference compare with the normal material.
Could you please tell me whether there's any relationship with valuation class for the error message: ME062? Because If I change the valuation class from 0001 to C394, I can create the PO without any error message. So I make the same configurations in T-code: OBYC for the new valuation class:0001 according to the normal valuation class: C394 . But the error is still appeared when creating PO with valuation class:0001, it's very strange, please give me some advises, thanks in advance.
Steps for Reconstruction
1. Create new Valuation Class matching the normal Account category reference(T-code:OMSK);
2. Create new material number by copying normal material number(T-code: MM01); Only change to new valuation class.
3. Create PO with the new material number(T-code: ME21N).
Hi
Can someone help me to create Automatic PO with 501 K movement type.
I need this when vendor sends consignment stock, Idoc should create good movement '501 - K' with Auto PO
Regards
Sudha
Dear friends,
I have a problem:
User has generated two Goods receipt (item 10 and 20) by transaction MIGO.
EKBE table and purchase order history are correctly updated and displayed; but the two records were not written in MKPF and MSEG tables.
When user try to display the Goods receipt, System shows the following error message:
Message no. M7062
I think that user must delete the two records from EKBE table and then retry to generate Goods receipt.
Are you agree? If yes, Can I delete the records by SE16?
Thank you for the answers.
Hello,
I'm looking for the transaction or the path to SPRO to access of the transaction field statusMEB1 "création Agreement".
I would like to know if he is still free zones or I could install information as a responsible buyer who would be bound to this agreement.
Thanks for your help.
Olivier
Hi,
I have done all the settings for Goods delivery and Goods Receipt based IV for Service PO.When i am creating the Service PO without any reference of PR and quotation the indicators are populated automatically but when i use PR or RFQ the indicators are not coming automatically.What is the settings which i am missing.
Thanks
Sachin
Hi all.
Seems after last update, we have lost the function to export from many TA's including MB5L, directly to spreadsheet. Now I have to export to txt and then import to Excel and convert the data to a table. The problem is that when exporting to txt, not all lines are being correctly separated by tabs, and this makes me spend hours running through hundreds of thousands of lines each exported file at a time, or else risk many lines being blank or even having to concatenate the infracting lines one by one, often having to guess were the break points should be.
Is there any way to force export to Excel?
Hi,
Does anyone know, which of the following options gets more FUNCTIONALITY from the Ariba Network Integration?
+ Installation of the Ariba Network Integration via the Rapid Deployment Solution
+ Installation of the Ariba Network Integration via the SAP ERP Add-on
Thanks in advance,
Nacho
Dear Team,
I would like to check whether the material is batch managed or not. Should I need to check MARA-XCHPF or I need to check MARC-XCHPF?
Should I need to check the above table fields based on the configuration setting in OMCE (Batch level activation)?
And also I can see the field XCHAR (Batch mgmt. indicator -internal) in MARC. But I can NOT see this field in MARA. What is the importance of this field XCHAR? With this field can I able to identify whether the material is batch managed or not?
Thanks
Hi,
while doing MIGO, error 'this material is currently blocked'.
I checked in the material master for plant material status in basic data, purchasing, mrp, costing views left blank and also physical inventory, vendor master as well
plz guide me.
Hello Expert,
Q1. Is it possible to make field Planning calender (MARC - MRPPP) in MRP2 as mandatory IF you choose Periodic lot sizing (ZK) in MRP1 - (MARC - DISLS) on a purchased material?
As per my understanding: We can configure field selection group-(51) to [Hide, Display, Required entry, or Optional entry] for respective field reference.(Material type, Industry sector, Plant, Transaction, Procurement Type etc).
Regards,
Ganesh
Hi Experts,
I got one question regarding product allocation procedure. In order to make whole process more relevant to the requirements I would like to have product allocation key figure (in flexible planning) updated with values of inventory available (e.g. unrestricted) for specific products. Then there is no need to put volume for allocation manually. For large portfolio it seems to be value added and helpful. Unfortunately, I have idea how to solve it. Thanks a lot for the support.
BR,
Alex