Hello folks,
While creating a GR against a subcontracting Purchase Order the unloading point (ABLAD) in component segment (Movt type 543 O) in MIGO screen is appearing as non editable. We have tried all the options like, OMJX, OMJJ, OMCJ,etc. But nothing was helpful.
We want ABLAD as ready for input and editable field in MIGO . Please help in this regard.
Thanks
Amitava B
We are moving from stock from plant A to Plant B .Both belongs to same company code. We create STO-DELIVERY-PGI-MIGO.
Accounting team wants when we move material from A to B all the entry should be cleared automatically.
Example:-In the below example we move material from 1020 to 1024.During PGI following accounting document is created .Material cost is 602.32 and 30.12 is freight cost.
| 1000 | 1 | 99 | 135075 | Invt - Trading Gds | 602.32- | USD | P10020 | CS114 | |||
| 1000 | 2 | 89 | 135075 | Invt - Trading Gds | 632.44 | USD | P10024 | CS114 | |||
| 1000 | 3 | 50 | 660170 | Stock Transfer Billi | 30.12- | USD | P10020 | C10020051 | CS114 |
Accounting wants entries should be
602.32- 1020
602.32 1024
301.12- 1020
30.12 1024.
Let me know how I can archive that.
Hello,
Given below is the requirement for new template for a new material type. Today we have material types MATLTYPE1 & MATLTYPE2 working fine in our system with the below settings
MATLTYPE1 - External Number Assignment Without Validation is “Ticked” in Tcode: OMS2 and number range is not assigned in Tcode: MMNR. Sample material number format is “ANNNNNN.NNNNN” (or) “NNN.NNN.NNNNN” (or) “ANNNNNNNNN”. (A – Alphabetic, N – Numeric).
MATLTYPE2– Ext.Number Assignment Without Validation is “UnTicked” in tcode: OMS2 and number range is assigned in Tcode: MMNR. From Number 000000000000000000 to number ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ and External Indicator is “ticked”. Sample material number format is “NNN”
Now we got a request for new material type with material number masking. The materials in this new material type should be shown in the format of “NNNNNN-NNNN-NNN”. For example material entered as 1234 should be displayed and stored as 000000-0001-234. And material entered as 12345678 should be displayed as 000001-2345-678.
Please provide your recommendation on how to fulfill this request without any impact on the existing material types MATLTYPE1 & MATLTYPE2
Thanks,
Baskar
Dear colleagues,
I have a problemin the process ofconsumption ofstandardservice contractshave avalueWKcontractand aservice linewith servicemaster,it definedthe header valueof 10,000andthe line ofservicein5000. The problem occurswhen I make apurchase requisitionto consume50% of theserviceline (2500), when I createthe purchasebytransactionME59NorME21Ntheservice linevalue isnovalue set in thepurchase requisition, the system considers thevalue setin line with thecontract service. I needthe suggested valuein the line ofthe purchase requisitionservice to bebrought toorder.
Could anyone helpme?
hello
I have a senario where not valuated material has the following cycle:pr-po-ir no gr is made.Now during miro system picks wrong g/l account and has an error f5507 with a wrong account.I know the senario is bad because material is actually a cost but I need to find a way to fix it without change tolerance limits.
Kindly thanks
hi all, my user needs some kind of functionality in which the delivery date in PO gets reset up on final release of PO. or is there any way where delivery date in PO gets reset on LC opening date. please advice.
namrah --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi
I am creating the intrastat report for finland and i have couple of questions
1. In Finland statistical value can be kept empty as per custom but in MEIS i still get the error like statistical value is zero under in-completion log how to resolve this
2. How to declare the 102 or 161 movement in the intrastat report
3 what is the use of supplementary UOM and what is the meaning of second UOM
Regards
Gaurav
Hi
I need to customize Vendor on time delivery,
Please advise me the procedures.
Thanks in advance,
R.Manikandan
Hello SAP friends,
Maybe this situation is more common to country where is use NFe.
When I use MIGO "Transfer Posting->Purchase Order" move type 541, press "Nota Fiscal" button I'm moved to another screen called "Create Nota Fiscal Issue - NFe" (second screen of the tcode J1B1N) where I can fill several different field, my doubt is:
Can I fill does field using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE?
To be specific, Incoterms (INCO1 and INCO2) fields.
I using GM Code 04 and move type 541.
Hi,
When we maintain Vendor Code in Partner on MN04 Transaction Screen, there is an error in sending EMail.
When I removed the Vendor Code, there was no issue in sending PO Email.
Just want to know what is the actual reason for this.
Our ABAP consultant also confirmed the same but we don't have the clue about the actual reason.
Regards,
PK
Hi,
We have the following master data settings:-
MRP Type- VB
Re Order Point- 100
Lot Size- HB - Replenishment to max stock
Max Lot Size- 20
Maximum Stock Level- 150
Planned Delivery Time- 5 days
GR processing time-1day
Planning run on 05.11.2015
System generated the eight schedule lines as below:-
11.11.15 20
11.11.15 20
11.11.15 20
11.11.15 20
11.11.15 20
11.11.15 20
11.11.15 20
11.11.15 10
Why the delivery date is same for all the schedule lines. My client wants it should be different as per planned delivery time.
How to achieve this.
Regards
Aman
Hi All,
Just wanted to ask you whether possible is to have product allocated to sales channels / customers during goods receipt, before confirmation of sales order ? Meaning, even though there is no shortages, particular customers cannot order more than ammount given in allocation, before they put an order. The standard way, that I'm aware of, you can only allocate durign shortages to confirm sales order, no to receipts.
Thanks a lot for your help!
Hi experts,
If we delete a line on PO after it has been generated , the PO still shows the total cost as if the line is still there instead of revised cost without the line, so if i delete the line the total value of PO should get reduced. Please share your valuable views on this issue.
Thanks
Dear all,
In current period we have enough stock and GR done in current period.
I need to post goods issue in previous period but Unrestr.-use stock in MM03 plant stocks in previous period view is not enough.
Please suggest solution to handle the scenario.
Thanks in advance
Visoth,
Hello MM gurus,
As part of implementing 3 way match configuration for the procurement process under instruction from auditors, I was told that I have to check the 'Firm in PO' check-boxes under Control:GR and Control:IR tabs for Item Category 'Standard'. When I go to the specific SPRO path 'Materials Management->Purchasing->Define External Representation of Item Categories' to make this configuration change, these check-boxes are unchecked and grayed out, and change is not allowed, even after trying to go into change mode. I did see some other posts out there, saying they have encountered the same issue, but I could not find any good explanation/solution under any of those posts. The auditor is insistent that I should be able to do it, but I have no clue how that can be achieved other than make a repair. I have SAP_ALL in my development system as well,so I am positive it is not an authorization issue.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Wayfarer
how to post Goods receipt for STO doc type UB based on outbound delivery using MBGMCR(inbound) idoc .
I have tried by posting GR using MBGMCR idoc through trasaction WE19 and it is successful if i put STO number but not against delivery.
Hi,
Is there a way to correct the available stock of material with vendor error ?
On the screenshot above, I have 10 items available and 11 in transfer. The positive negative should not be red, and the available stock of material with vendor should be 0 instead of -11.
Any idea ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Thibault
Hi Experts,
Kindly suggest me the idea to configure for the following scenario,
The client is buying a material from an import vendor who has promised them that they will be reducing the Price of the material gradually after every 100 Qty of purchase.
The client is expecting the system to consider how many ever PO we raise into account until 100 is completed and later automatically suggest the lesser price.
Example scenario,
PO no1: 98qty- 100rs
PO no2: 10qty
Here the system should assume that for 2 qty in PO no:2 will consider as Rs100(since the 100 qty is crossed) and for 8 quantity it is 90rs.
OR
PO no1: 10 Qty
PO no2: 10 Qty
PO no3: 10 Qty
PO no4: 50 Qty
PO no5: 25 Qty
In this case, the system should consider, for POno:5, Rs100 for 20 and 98 for the rest of 5 quantity. since the 100 Qty is crossed.
Regards,
Thulasi
Hi,
My client requirement is that he wants to get the purchase order modification done details on the print out.
Purchase order is created and is released, and now if i do changes to that p.o then in printout i need to have the "PO created date" and the P.o modified date"
I have changed the P.o now and send to vendor and now again im doing some changes on p.o and sending it back to vendor, and vendor should understand that he should ignore the 1st p.o and the current p.o is correct.
How can I do this.
Thanks
Abdul.
Hi experts
I am creating PO, say for 3 line items for 10 quantity 50 USD each and net value of 1500 USD. When I print preview its showing correctly that is net value 1500 USD. Again I go to ME23N and deleted a line item and saved, so net value becomes 1000 USD. The problem is when I print preview now, that is after modifying PO still the old net value appears (1500 USD instead of 1000 USD). Please give your valuable ideas to solve this.
Thanks