Hello,
Could you please explain me how to allow only one cost center in purchase requisition ? And if the purchase requisition contains several cost centers I want to display an error message when the user clicks on the save button.
Thank you,
Regards,
Tom.
Hi, How I can authorize users to MM60 / MB51 / MB52 to show all the datas of specific plant but not the cost? Thanks and best regards. Antonio
Hi Experts,
We have activated LOG_MMFI_P2P. We created down payment through transaction code ME2DP & executed the cycle up to down payment clearing stage. All the activities executed without any hassle, but when posted the invoice in MIRO by selecting entries through "Downpayment clearing" push button, the related line items still show in Vendor open items category. Not in Cleared category. The net effect of all the related entries in open items category is "0", but not gone to the cleared items. (find the attached image)
Waiting for a solution
Thank you,
Kasun.
Hi All,
We have scenarios, where we use unit conversions, for example "1PC = 4.4652 M2 (Meter Square)", we do stock transfer in unit Pieces (Pc), in many cases if we transfer 50 PCs then a small amount of 0.001Pc is showing as stock in transit for some PO in "Tcode MB5T", when I proceed for MIGO, system giving error as "M7022 - PL Stock in transit exceeded by 0.001 M2". And i am not able to do GRN for the same.
Please help to move that minor quantity from stock in transit to receiving plant.
Regards
Hello,
Please provide your inputs in fixing the below issue. Here is the steps followed by the user:
Now business requested to stock transport 10 EA instead of 9 EA. So user did the below steps:
Since the Delivery Qty does not match with PGI or GR Qty, user did the below steps
Please help in clearing this document and fix the issue.
Thanks,
Baskar
Dear All,
We have a scenario where our vendor's sending invoices with same no. While performing MIRO where we enter Reference no then list of Po's displaying with multiple Vendors with same Reference No. For example
1. PO No: 123456
Vendor No:abc
Bill No:a123
for this MIGO & MIRO also done.
2. PO No: 123457
Vendor No:bbc
Bill No:a123 when I am performing MIRO for this vendor then system also displaying completed (abc vendor) invoice details.
Client requirement is not to display PO's whose MIRO are completed.
Regards,
Jafar
Dear All,
We have only one PR release strategy in our client place.
Even if the PR value is changed to lower yalue from original value or changed line items to the original value, the release strategy need to be retriggered.
The above requied to stop the malpractice.
Kindly give your expert advice.
Regards
Hi Experts,
Have an issue in the Non Inventory purchase order, where i am facing issue with respect to the difference in GRIR amount while reversal in GR and IR doucment.
Shown below are the Purchase order history in sequence along with accounting entries.
To give brief about the PO, its a Non inventory PO
Qty - 12,800 ea
Net Price - 1 USD / Ea
| Movement | M Type | Doc No. | Date | Qty | Value | Currency | Vendor Acc | GR/IR Acc | Stk Acc | GR/IR Clearing Value |
| RE-L | 5105691963 | 2/13/2015 | 1 | 12,190.00 | USD | -12190 | 12190 | -- | 12,190.00 | |
| RE-L | 5105694556 | 2/25/2015 | 1 | 305 | USD | -305 | 305 | -- | 305 | |
| WE | 101 | 5000121357 | 2/25/2015 | 305 | 12,798.00 | USD | -- | -12798 | 12798 | 0 |
| RE-L | 5105699338 | 3/26/2015 | 305 | 305 | USD | -305 | 305 | -- | 305 | |
| WE | 101 | 5000130263 | 4/10/2015 | 12,190 | 12,190.00 | USD | -- | -12190 | 12190 | 0 |
| WE | 101 | 5000130264 | 4/10/2015 | 305 | 305 | USD | -- | -305 | 305 | 0 |
| RE-L | 5105601454 | 4/10/2015 | 305- | 305.00- | USD | 305 | -602.68 | 297.68 | 602.68 | |
| RE-L | 5105601457 | 4/10/2015 | 1- | 12,190.00- | USD | 12190 | -1.98 | 12188.02 | 1.98 | |
| RE-L | 5105601458 | 4/10/2015 | 1- | 305.00- | USD | 305 | -1.98 | 303.02 | 1.98 | |
| WE | 102 | 5000130227 | 4/10/2015 | 305- | 312.14- | USD | -- | 312.14 | -312.14 | 0 |
| WE | 101 | 5000130228 | 4/10/2015 | 305 | 305 | USD | -- | -305 | 305 | 0 |
| RE-L | 5105604778 | 5/1/2015 | 305 | 305 | USD | -305 | 311.97 | -6.97 | 311.97 | |
| RE-L | 5105604779 | 5/1/2015 | 12,190 | 12,190.00 | USD | -12190 | 12468.56 | -278.56 | 12468.56 | |
| RE-L | 5105604780 | 5/1/2015 | 305 | 305 | USD | -305 | 311.97 | -6.97 | 311.97 |
In this case the end user has followed incorrect process of doing the invoicing first with such a amount, however i need to find out why the system is calculating the incorrect Value for GRIR while reversal of Invoice and GR documents.
I have all the possible ways of calculating the values taking total invoice value and GR value etc but still cant understand the reason why 312.14 is appeared during GR reversal (Document No: 5000130227). Also tried below mention logic in calculating the value but still unsuccesful.
Require your help on urgent basis. Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Suchit Kurry
Hi All,
Prerequisites - SRM PO have acct assignment K without material.
GR is followed after IR.
Issue - GR quantity and amount is not matching with extra decimal amount, but IR amount and quantity is matching.
example - Material 1 EA is equal to 1 USD, but in GR has 60 EA is equal to 60.02 etc..
In this as GR-based-IV is not flagged, invoice dollar amount control GR - how does it control?
Need your expertise.
Hi Experts,
I am writing LSMW for hiring action. We have IT 0000,0001,0002,0006,7,8 and 0023 infogroup. I recorded all infotypes but when i do auto field mapping in 5th step Maintain Field Mapping and Conversion Rules I am unable to find the IT23 start date(BEGDA) and end date (ENNDA). But i have recorded in recording and also i maitain source fields as BEGDA2 and ENNDA2.
kindly let me know why start date and end date of IT 23 is not defaulting / coming in auto field mapping.Everything what i recorded is defaulting in auto field mapping.
Thanks and Regards,
kiran
Hi All,
A material is batch managed. Batches should be automatically determined based on SLED at the time of Goods issues.
When we click on batch determination during goods issue, Sort rule is not automatically picked up, every time it should be manually entered. Kindly let me know where could the possible errors be
Following steps has been carried out
1. Batch class created with expiry date as characteristics
2. Batch strategy type created (Sort rule assigned)
3. Batch determination procedure created with batch strategy type
4. Batch search procedure assigned to movement type 201
5. Batch search strategy assigned to movement type in MBC1.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Ranjjini
Hi Experts,
Please help me out in the following issue.
When doing ME47, the system behaving strangely like when I'm entering Price, price is not taken by the system. It is not accepting any value in the price field where as It is accepting in the CONDITIONS button. But in Conditions button, when I checked the pricing procedure, system showing my pricing procedure but of with out any condition types which I assigned in my schema. Then I manually entered condition types there and system is taking the values now. And I've done the ME49 also. I'm not able to understand where I went wrong? Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards,
SrinivaS
Dear SCN's,
While creating RFQ with respect to PR (created against Order by running MRP) the netprice field is greyed out in ME47 transaction. How to enter price for RFQ, is there anything to be done with configuration.
Hi all
For the above error already gone through the below note but I am not able to enter an Invoice for the "default qty & value 0".
note: 708649
Scenario is like below
PO: qty= 100, value = 100
Service entry sheet: qty =100, value = 100
Invoice : qty= 99, value= 100
payment also made to vendor.
MR11= difference qty: 1, tried to execute the MR11 system is throwing error message "purchase order history already inconsiderate".
Could you please help me to clear the balance quantity.
Thanks in advance!!
Regards,
AMD
Hi all,
I am trying to create a purchase requistion and the source is not coming automaticaly in source of supply tab. I have a info record, contract and vendor master. In me01, i maintained the vendor and material number (without info record) in one line and in other line, i had given the the contract.
Now when icreate the req, i am not getting the inforecord details or anything in source of supply. please advice.
Sylvia
Hi all,
I'm testing some functionalities regarding vendor evaluation to implement it, but I'm facing and weird situation. I've set up the main criteria delivery and performed a GR at the right delivery date and quantity, I mean, I've created a PO to 50 units of a material to be delivered on 20.10.2015. On MIGO t-code I've performed the mov type 101 at this date and with the quantity of 100 unit.
Once I did that, my vendor received 100 points, as I expected, however I performed the gr reversal of this document using mov type 102, but the score didn't returned to 0, it is still 100 points. Shouldn't it be reset to 0 points once I reversed the GR?
PO:
Vendor evaluation after reversal with 100 points yet.
Thanks a lot in advance.
Best Regards,
Rodrigo Amorim
Dear All,
We have a scenario where our vendor's sending invoices with same no. While performing MIRO where we enter Reference no then list of Po's displaying with multiple Vendors with same Reference No. For example
1. PO No: 123456
Vendor No:abc
Bill No:a123
for this MIGO & MIRO also done.
2. PO No: 123457
Vendor No:bbc
Bill No:a123 when I am performing MIRO for this vendor then system also displaying completed (abc vendor) invoice details.
Client requirement is not to display PO's whose MIRO are completed.
Regards,
Jafar
I would like to know if it is possible (without custom programs, only by customizing), to inherit automatically the purchasing group from vendor master data when you create a purchase info record
Thanks in advance
Marco
Hello All,
We are currently at EHP5 on ECC 6.0. We have planned for an EHP upgrade to EHP7, I would like to know what are the prerequisites & points to be taken care of before the upgrade?
Kanban external procurement with strategy 0006 is not working. I have created new control cycle & with new production supply area.Done contrainer empty. & then run MRP with tcode MD03. It has generated Planned Orders. That I have converted in to PR & then PO.
After goods receipt I observe that Kanban bin is not getting filled.
Thanks,
Kiran