Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live

IDOC Error 51 for ORDRSP PO Acknowledgement (Message ME729)

$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

We have got the EDI implemented but had not activated it till this time...

 

Now after activating it, we are getting error 51 while processing the Pur Order Acknowledgement (ORDRSP) with message ME729.

 

Price unit 1 from IDoc differs from unit of purchase order 1.000

Message no. ME729

Diagnosis

The price unit 1 from the IDoc differs from the one from the purchase order 1000 (purchase order 4500033647 00030).

 

Procedure

Get the vendor to send you the correct order price unit and price unit in the IDoc.

 

I believe this should be common scenario wherein the price unit used by Vendor will be different than what is being used by us (in SAP) and SAP should be considering the per unit price and not price and price unit separately. Any pointer in this respect will be highly appreciated.

 

Regards,

Ravi


Plant wise/Storage Location wise where used list of Material ve

$
0
0

Hello Gurus,

I am working is support project wherein we are receiving numerous material extension/creation requests from the users. There are more than 1000 plants and on an average 30 to 40 storage locations per plant.


We want to analyze the usability of extended/created materials.

Are they (users) really using all those materials in requested plants and storage locations?


I have tried to analyze standard SAP tables like EKPO for purchase orders, MSEG for material documents etc. but it is really difficult for me to find all the places/applications where those materials are being used.


Is there any standard SAP report which can tell us the plant wise and storage location wise unused materials? Materials which are not used at all, just created or extended in system without any use?

 

Thanks,

PS

MC.9 after MMAM .. migration possible ?

$
0
0

Hi Folks

 

We've changed one of our product lines to a new material type (using MMAM). However, the material analysis (MC.9) only gives me data if I select the old material type.

 

Is there a migration program, or how can I "convince" the MC.9 to show me again the basic list?

 

Any help appreciated!

 

Kind regards,

 

Kurt

Schedule line firmed positions fixing

$
0
0

Hello All,

 

I would like to ask you help me with MRP schedule lines, Every week firmed lines are changing quantities but they should bot be changed once they are firmed.

 

Is there an option to fix quantites in the lines once they become firmed?

 

Thanks

Lsmw problem

$
0
0

Dear Cons

we want to upload the initial entry of stock for one thousand material through T-code- LSMW. our requirement is the system should create one material document no for all the one thousand material code because we maintained all  the material details in a file which is necessary for uploading the file(IN SPECIFY FILES-lsmw). Is their any way to configure in T-code- LSMW.

 

Edited by: mmconsultant.. on Jan 3, 2012 5:53 AM

GR/IR Price Difference in a PO, want to know how the amount of 312.14 came during GR Reversal

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Have an issue in the Non Inventory purchase order, where i am facing issue with respect to the difference in GRIR amount while reversal in GR and IR doucment.

 

Shown below are the Purchase order history in sequence along with accounting entries.

 

To give brief about the PO, its a Non inventory PO

 

Qty - 12,800 ea

Net Price - 1 USD / Ea

 

MovementM TypeDoc No.DateQtyValueCurrencyVendor AccGR/IR AccStk AccGR/IR Clearing Value
RE-L51056919632/13/2015112,190.00USD-1219012190--12,190.00
RE-L51056945562/25/20151305USD-305305--305
WE10150001213572/25/201530512,798.00USD---12798127980
RE-L51056993383/26/2015305305USD-305305--305
WE10150001302634/10/201512,19012,190.00USD---12190121900
WE10150001302644/10/2015305305USD---3053050
RE-L51056014544/10/2015305-305.00-USD305-602.68297.68602.68
RE-L51056014574/10/20151-12,190.00-USD12190-1.9812188.021.98
RE-L51056014584/10/20151-305.00-USD305-1.98303.021.98
WE10250001302274/10/2015305-312.14-USD--312.14-312.140
WE10150001302284/10/2015305305USD---3053050
RE-L51056047785/1/2015305305USD-305311.97-6.97311.97
RE-L51056047795/1/201512,19012,190.00USD-1219012468.56-278.5612468.56
RE-L51056047805/1/2015305305USD-305311.97-6.97311.97

 

In this case the end user has followed incorrect process of doing the invoicing first with such a amount, however i need to find out why the system is calculating the incorrect Value for GRIR while reversal of Invoice and GR documents.

 

I have all the possible ways of calculating the values taking total invoice value and GR value etc but still cant understand the reason why 312.14 is appeared during GR reversal (Document No: 5000130227). Also tried below mention logic in calculating the value but still unsuccesful.

 

Require your help on urgent basis. Thanks in Advance.

 

Regards,

Suchit Kurry

Info Update for PO Consignment

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I have a strange issue. I have default values for buyers ti auto-info update for every PO.

 

When i create a consignment PO the info update indicator is not selected automatically, but i am able to select it in the material tab. Why is this happening?

 

I would like consignment info records to be created automatically as standard info records do.

 

BR

mc.9 XXL function not possible

$
0
0

Hi friends,

 

While downloading the data through mc.9 by material analysis---> Export----> Transfer to XXL we are getting the error as XXL function not possible.

 

Regards,

sun


PO line item not amendable in MIGO 411-Q

$
0
0

Hi All ,

Requirement is to give PO number and line item while doing MIGO 411 Q

i could manage to bring PO in editable mode in MIGO 411Q via doing changes on OMJJ  but  same way couldn't work out for making PO line item amendable in 411 Q- MIGO  and showing error

 

Appreciate your suggestion to achieve this  PO "Line item "amendable in 411 Q

 

Thanks

Printing from Print preview for the Purchase order in ME23N ,Print Icon is greyed out.

$
0
0


We have an issue, We where able to print from the Print Preview Screen for the Purchase order in ME23N transaction earlier few months back, now we are not able to do that now?. I have checked the User Profile Paramenters, Output Conditions and SAP GUI wiht help of ABAP. Please help me out to activate the Print Icon in the Print Preview for the Purchase order in ME23N Transaction. Pls let me know how to activate?

 

Regards

Anil

Delivery creation issue in PO in Background

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have created a background job to create delivery for SO and POs using program RVV50R10C. Through this background job, system creates delivery for SO and PO, but not in the fashion we wanted. Below is an instance of an issue.

 

I have created a PO with 3 line items with 3 different materials. The requirement was to create one delivery for the entire PO for all the 3 line items. But instead the background job creates 3 deliveries for this PO, one delivery for each line item.

 

Can anybody suggest why the system creates multiple deliveries for the PO with multiple line items? Please suggest how can I create only one delivery for the entire PO? Do I have to do any specific settings in the background job in-order to achieve the desired result?

 

Thanks

SBS

lsmw standard program 0110 goods movment

$
0
0

Kindly i have problems with standard program 0110 for opening balance:

 

-External amount field doesn't exist in step field mapping.

-posting date became like  31.10.20  in converting step despite source field length = 99.

Special stock indicator on the inbound delivery.

$
0
0

Hi all,

 

Wondering if someone can help me out. I am contacted by a client with the following challenge, all stock was previously held in consignment however for one finished material they have decided to purchase these as non-consignment. The PIR has been setup to reflect this and when the PO (ME21N) is created the K flag is not populated. Now when there 3PL (DC) creates an inbound delivery on the client's system the K flag is populated in the goods movement data thus indicating to store it physically as K in the warehouse but also receiving it in SAP as K.

 

My question: where is the K derived from when creating an inbound delivery.

 

Thank you in advance for your help.

Discover UoM *** under MM03 transaction

$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

 

Need to find which UoM is set on base unit of measure under mm03 transaction for some materials so I can fix on Cuni transaction. Is there a walk around to fix that?

 

regards

 

Oliver F

number range object for LOC request over ADS

$
0
0

Dears,

i have implemented the new note ( 0002105996 ) related to LOC for logistics in middle east and i made the necessary configuration the only thing missing is the number range object, i can not find which number range object to be assigned to the LOC request or even LOC.

 

 

regards.


Issue in tool admin ICC (T-Code: /OPT/VIM_7AX8)

$
0
0

I am trying run a report Tool Admin ICC T-code /OPT/VIM_7AX8 but I see that the status of documents PD not are automatically updated. Could you please help with this problem?

Contabilidad Electronica - UUID Mass update for Logistics Invoice

$
0
0

Hi,

After implement note 2075584 the UUID field is displayed in MIRO t-code and should populate during posting logistics invoice,

I want to update massively all logistics invoices without UUID.

 

Any ideas will appriciated

 

Best regards and thanks in advance,

Brazil STO Receipt 861

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I'm currently facing issues posting GR against STO in Brazil implementation using movement type 861. I hit error message 8B378 "Enter a delivery note number for transaction type 861" when posting GR from both MIGO and MB0A.

 

We have already implemented note '2012745 - STO: Goods Receipt error on MIGO using Inbound Delivery' and yet the same error is still being thrown.

 

Do you have any solutions to fix this error, or alternatively suggest a different method to receive transfer with movement type 861?

 

Thanks

Jeremy

condition record exclusion based on key combination for vendor rebate settlement

$
0
0

Hello Experts, We have requirement to create multiple condition records for vendor rebate settlement. For example in a contract some or all types of condition records are being created ZVR1 - with a key combination of Purch.Org./Vendor/Site/Article - value in % ZVR2 -Purch.Org./Vendor/Site/Article - value in $ ZVR3 - Purch.Org./Vendor/Site - value in % ZVR4 -Purch.Org./Vendor/Subrange/Site - value in % ZVR5 - Purch.Org./Vendor/Site/Imprint ( custom field) - value in % the requirement is if all the condition records were created for a contract, still PO pricing procedure and rebate pricing procedure should pick only one condition record and not all. In the above case if Porg/Vendor/subrange/site specific condition record is maintained, then all other conditions should be deactivated. Similarly if Porg/vendor/site/imprint does exist then all other condition records should be deactivated. I tried using the standard exclusion technique and I can compare 2 condition and exclude one but I am not sure how to expand beyond 2 conditions. We need to define the hierarchy level and exclusion should work base on hierarch level so in this case ZVR4 is level 5 followed by ZVR5>> ZVR2 and so on. If any one has done this type of exclusion using standard configuration, please share your thoughts with example . I appreciate your help in this regard and thank you in advance. Regards, Venkat

Account determination for Finished Goods

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

My question is about Accounts being determined when GRN created for Finished Goods from the Subcontractor. Please see below details and screen shot and advise.


The attached Accounting doc is created when GR is done for the Finished Product from the Subcontractor.

=> These Accounts are determined for 3 components namely a) Raw materials consumed, b) Finished Products Received and c) Scrap.

Our focus in the discussion is on Raw materials & Finished product

=> Raw materals are Consumed - so that "Raw Materials Inventory" Credit& "Raw materials consumption" Debit. OK

BUT

=> Finished Products are Received using Movement Type 101 and Stock Increased. Therefore, Finished Goods Inventory should be "Debited" and Inventory change should be Credited, I believe.

But it is the other way round in the below screen shot. Why??

Also please see the posting Key against Finished Goods Inventory- 99 - Stock outward movement.

In fact Finished Goods movement here is Inward - NOT outward


Thanks for the support.

NR

Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>