Dear Gurus,
My customer performs 501 mvt for materials without any PO. The materials have been received and sold to customers.
We're not able to perform invoice against PO to keep the link.
Can you tell me how could we have the invoice and what to do with the open PO items.
Thanks for your help.
Hi Readers,
Do you know if for example I delete PO line item 1, will the PO commitment be reduced?
Appreciate your input if you know how to answer this.
Thanks!
unlimited delivery tick is getting removed from PO when I do GR against PO & change the price of the PO item .
I tried checking SAP note 1644491 - unlimited overdelivery flag is cleared with price change but it cannot be implemented.
Hi-
What is the outcome of setting a scheduling agreement additional data field of "Firm Zone" = to the "trade off zone"?
Currently the Firm Zone = the material lead time (77)
With Firm zone = 77
Trade off Zone = 77
AND
Binding on MRP = 1
Does this now allow changes to be created within the trade off zone (even if it equal the firm zone)??
I want to set the scheduling agreement up correctly so that changes are NOT made within the Firm Zone (lead time).
Do I still need to set the "Biding on MRP" to NULL?
Thanks in advance!
Hello All,
I've read through quite a few discussions and it basically seems that you cannot under any circumstance perform a 309 posting when the stock keeping units differ. But is this also the case when you are using the same type of measurement? For instance I need to move a material with Stock keeping unit in KG's to one with Stock keeping unit in GR's you would think that SAP would be able to handle a simple conversion since no matter this substance Kilograms can always be converted to grams simply by changing a decimal place. Our current system is 4.6C so if there is no other way than either creating internal orders or 201's and 202's to change the materials than I do have a question regarding ECC 6.0 and if this is still the case?
Thanks
Hi Every one
i looked at SCN bt did not find any answer .
We raise PO as net without Tax and do GR .
We have activated 3 way match.
I would like to knwo whether 3 way match include tax on invoices ,
So example
PO value 100 ( exclude tax)
GR 100
IR 110 ( 100 plus 100 )
So when we do 3 way match system will just look at 100 in 3 way match ,
many Thanks
I am facing the Killing problem after activating the purchase accounting.(OMWO) .
Without activating the Purchase accounting (OMWO), the MIGO -GR is posted perfectly fine. but when I activate it (Purchase accounting -OMWO), I am Getting the Error while posting the MIGO -GR. for the account determination "
I did check following -
1. OBYC setting for - EIN & EKG - G/L assigned.
2. Table T030 entry - Screenshot is attached for G/L checking
3. Also maintained the blank entry for general modifier & account modifier in GBB to help as suggested in SCN.
4. OMJ7 setting is also OK.
Something is coming in the way when I activate the purchase accounting.
Some how system is not getting the "Account Grouping Code". Will anybody guide where I am missing.
(Moderators: I understand the similar issues asked & I have gone thru them in detail, but I cudnt figure out as document gets posted with out purchase account activated & with activated it doesn't allow. some thing critical input here)
Hi Friends,
I have created a PO for with account assignment category "F - order". I have done GR for the PO but im not seeing any value in amount in purchase order history tab against this GR and there is no FI document which i could see. what could be the issue.
Regards
Vijay
Hello gurus,
we have a problem with the MRP running for some materials. When we run the program RMMRP000, the date of the planned orders of some materials is not rescheduled. However, when we run manually the MRP in the transaction MD03, the planned orders are rescheduled properly.
For instance, for the following material, when we run the program RMMRP000 with this selection data:
The planned order is not rescheduled to 15.01.2014:
When we run the transaction MD03 with the following data:
The planned order is rescheduled to 15.01.2014:
Thank you.
Best regards.
Hello,
I've try to create a replenishment delivery with reference at a UB order, but i can't, this message appears:
Message no. VR547
When i go in log information to see the error is blank.
Do you have any idea what it's wrong or what i should check?
Thank you!
Hi,
Could someone explain to how the Storage locations are selected when I run transaction MICN.
Our settings in config are like this
I have a material in one storage location, it has never been counted. I run the transaction MICN for that material in my plant with today's date nothing is returned. I change the date to one year in the future and the system returns many locations including the one the material is in. I can comprehend that because the count date is empty in the mard table, I have to enter a future date but why do I get many location where the material is not even stored in?
By the way as we only want to count all our items once per year, they have all been set with the letter D in the material master.
Kind Regards
Thierry
Hi,
I was looking for a report to have the list of inbound deliveries where is present the supplier document number and the document date (derived from the same named field in BORGR).
I tried to use VL06I but in the header view there is only the supplier document number (External Delivery ID). The only dates I found are the delivery date and the good receipt date.
Is there any other available report?
Thanks & regards
Enza
Hello Experts,
I am facing issue while deleting Batch class through CL24N error is Assignment cannot be deleted,
prior to this i have deleted the class from all batches visible in MMBE through MSC2N. but i can see there are more batches in MCHA table which do not have stock as seen in MMBE, Question is do i have to check these batches also for the classification and then after removing i can do CL24N deletion?
Please advice
Thanks
Hi,
I had asked a question previously on how to create Sub tabs (Grouping) of different characteristics in classification view in Material master.
Material Class - Creating new Sub Tabs for Different kinds of Characteristics
I now have a follow up question for the sub tabs :
So, I was successfully able to create the different groups of characteristics on material master. My question is I know that the class, characteristics can not be transported to a different client using a transport request. You can chose to use ALE to move it between clients.
Is there a way using which the grouping of different charecterisitcs can also be moved to different systems ?
Thanks a lot for your help.
Regards,
Amit
Hello,
do you know if it is possible to freeze a period (for instance a week) in order to MRP doesn't create any document (planned orders, purchasing requisitions, etc.) for some materials?
Thank you.
Best regards.
Hi
I have a requirement to aggregate schedule lines that are in the past- is this possible ?
In SPRO / Maintain Creation Profile -I have:
Weekly aggregation as 0 - 999 for forecast
Daily aggregation 0 -10 for JIT .
Do these only aggregate schedule releases for dates in the future ?
Example of what I am seeing:
29.12.2014 100
29.12.2014 150
05.01.2015 40
W3/ 2015 300
W4/ 2015 240
I wish for the dates in the past to be aggregated - E.g 250 for 29.12.2014 in one line
Dear Gurus
We are facing issue for creating PR for MRP items in MD02.
We are able to create PR for all material but in one material when I run MD02 it shows PR created 2 but when I check list in ME5A it does not shows any PR.
Reorder point is maitained as 35 and unrestricted stock is 35 and reserved stock is 209 .
Kindly help in the issue.
Thanks
Himanshu
Dear Experts,
We require only one field (Purchasing group) to amend in ME52N by a group of persons. And for he same we tried through authorization control but it didnt work, as all fields were in changeable mode instead of only purchasing group.
We thought of SHD0 process to work in it,can we go in this way? Will it be effective to meet the target.
Is there any other workaround to achieve it so that one party can access std. ME52N and the other party gets ME52N only to change purchasing group .
BR
UK
Hi all,
I have a specific requirement i would like to discuss.
My client wants a PO to be approved from a specific person for mat. group A and for mat. Group B from the person responsible in the WBS element master data.
The MM Release srategy defines the levels. For all mat. groups we have 1 level. User exit EXIT_SAPLEBND_002 for Release strategy helps me to manipulate approval levels in order to define different RS. But how can i find the approver and show his PO's only in the SAP Fiori PO approval application?
BR
Hi All,
I have a requirement wherein the GOODS ISSUE against the Purchase Order with the returns flag (returns Purchase Order) should call out or post with a different movement type (ex. Z61) instead of the standard 161.
Further, it should also update the PO history with the movement type Z61, and create a Credit note with reference to PO / Goods Movement document.
Is there any standard setting for this in standard customization??? If yes, what would be the setting??
Also, as this is going to be background transaction (and not the MIGO or the VL10B) based on iDoc. So can there be a possibility to use the new movement type Z61, and then updating the PO History and further Post the Credit note based on this Goods Movement in Background? Any idea on how to do it on a high level would also help.
It would be really helpful if I could get the reply at the earliest.
Thanks and Regards,
Ankush