UB doc type PO not generating O/P messages
List of completed POs with compare all line items
Experts,
I need a report where I can see the all completed POs. I can see this from ME2N/ME2M/ME2L.... report. But it is considering the line items. I need to fetch these POs which has completed GR for all line items.
As an example,
I have a PO with 3 line items with qty 10, 10, 10. GR has completed for first 2 line items as 10, 10. But GR has done only 5 qty for 3rd line item.
Then I'll not consider this as complete PO as GR has not done completely for line item 3.
I've checked the selection parameter for report ME2N/ME2M/ME2L....., but it is considering the line item.
I've set the selection parameter as below :
With that, I am getting the line item 1 and 2 as completed PO. But I don't want to show that PO also because GR has not done completely for line item 3.
In short, I want just those POs whose are having "Fully Delivered" status in Header - Status tab (without comparing by line item).
New funcionality for MM release strategy with EHP6
Hello,
My client recently upgraded his system to ECC6.0 with EHP6.
I would like to know if this particular versión with HP 6 brings any (real) new funcionality for the Purchasing Release process?
For instance the posibility to asign more than one class in the PO strategy?
Thanks for any reply.
Aart
Inventory account showing " 0 " during 161 movement type
Dear Experts,
Request for valuable inputs.
Issue: Return PO has been created for the same material ( example: A00000000 - Price control is V ) in two different line items, but one line item is with CS and second line item in PC. Performed MIGO ( 161 - Movement type ). When we checked in MB51, we observed that article document got posted with " 0 " value in Inventory account for the second line item and that value is added in the 1st line item inventory account.
Example is as below
Article document | Material | Plant | Storage location | Quantity | Amount | Eun |
0000000000 | A00000000 | ABCD | abcd | 8 | 29.317,21- | CS |
0000000000 | A00000000 | ABCD | abcd | 5 | 0 | PC |
But if you go to Accounting documents, entries are as below.
for the two line items.
Inventory account = 29.317,21-
GR/IR Account = 31.405,68
PRD = 2.088,47-
GR/IR account = 408,27
PRD = 408,27-
Please advise why value " 0 " is coming in MB51.
Regards
Sesha.
Find materials of a specific material type AND a specific SPT.
Dear experts
I would need to know which would be the wisest way to retrieve info from the system to obtain these two informations.
+ All the materials of a specific material type.
AND as another query.....
+ All the materials of a specific material type that have a certain special procurement type (MARC-SOBSL)
Please suggest me how to do it with and without a query because I am not aware if I have authorization S_QUERY. Then I will put it in an Excel file because somebody else will process it. All the answers are important and very valuable.
Thanks.
M.
OCI in MM
hi, I managed to connect to the vendor catalog through OCI from MM. I need to know where to map the fields of the vendors,to MM fields, i.e. Material Group, Description, etc
My view to prepare a report for all completed PO numbers with or without open invoice
Business Requirement:
We know we can get all types of purchase report from ME2N/ME2M/ME2L etc. But these all reports are considering as per line item. These reports will show you result line item wise when you run with your criteria (like as Selection parameter).
When you want to get a report for completed POs with consider all line items. When you want a report only for these PO numbers, whose are having delivery complete for all line items. You will not consider these POs as complete if GR will be pending (or partial GR) for any line item.
In short, you want a report with the indicator as “Fully Delivered” in Header – Status tab.
As an example,
You have a PO with 2 line items, GR has fully completed for first line item but your second line item has the partial GR. So when you will consider this PO as incomplete PO as second line item has some GR pending.
You will find more information in this discussion List of completed POs with compare all line items. I had posted the query but didn’t find any standard solution. Experts says, I have to go with development. Somehow, I’ve prepared this report with the field delivery complete indicator (EKPO) and Ms Excel.
I want to share my experience so that it can be helpful for others.
Actually my boss had given the task to me. We have one vendor and we are doing invoice when the PO for this vendor will be totally completed. My boss asked me to give the all completed PO numbers with open invoices, so that he can calculate the quantity for open invoices.
But before doing this you might have to know some important notes:
You will need to make this report when you will agree to pay invoices only when all line items of a single PO number are totally completed.
As you can see the report will be made by some work which is outside from SAP (as MS excel), so if you are agreed with to do an extra work analysis outside SAP.
If your PO is containing multiple line items, since if your some data (like as material, plant etc) are not same for multiple line items, then you can’t combine these lines into one.
You can’t do this when your vendor will give you invoice as per line item and vendor says you will not get rest material until you pay his sent invoices for another line item (which has completed).
You can’t do this when your vendor says he will give you some discount if you pay him for another line item which has completed and you will not able to get this discount if you will wait for the whole PO complete (all line items). Then it is suggestible to make the invoice and payment as per line item.
Scenario:
PO number 4500013608 contains 3 line items.
PO number 4500013609 contains 2 line items.
GR pending only for 3rd line item for PO number 4500013608. Hence I just need the report which will contain only PO number 4500013609 because only this PO number get fully completed.
Steps:
Create a selection parameter as delivery complete tick indicator and delivered = Ordered. So that we can get all these line items whose are having filly GR completed.
Save the selection parameter.
Then take the all completed PO numbers (completed as per line item) with from ME2N with selection parameter ZDEV and ALV layout. It brings 4 entries (2 line items for PO number 4500013608 and 2 line items for PO number 4500013609)
Export it to excel.
Then copy these PO numbers and take the DCI indicator from EKPO table (DCI will be flagged only for these line items which has GR completed and also be sure your system has the option set delivery indicator automatically activated).
Export it into another excel sheet and replace the blank with value A (You can use A to W - alphabetically below than X). Then sort the DCI field. You can see the A will be appeared first.
You can see my one PO number has two DCI indicator as A and X. I have sorted this because we know excel will take the first value for formula V-Lookup when source contain different value.
Now I have two excel sheets. First is exported from ME2N and second is exported from EKPO table. I've done V-Lookup and take the DCI indicator from second excel to first excel.
Now our first excel will look like as below:
Now here, delete the line item which will contain the value A in DCI field.
After delete the line items, you will get the line item which will contain only value X for the field DCI.
It is the report for all PO numbers which has completed GR in header status.
It means I get the PO number which are having GR as fully cleared for all line item.
I can compare this PO in SAP system as Header – Status as “Fully Delivered”
Here, in your excel sheet, you've got these PO numbers which are having GR fully delivered.
Now if you want to check the Invoice has already done yet or not for these PO numbers, then just go to ME2N report and filter these PO numbers with selection parameter “RECHNUNG”. You will get the result for all PO numbers with header status as “Fully Delivered” and “Not yet invoice”.
automatic batch classification error
Dears,
while doing GR, system creates batch automatically, i get the error (LOBM_VFDAT: Value "00.00.0000" not found).. this also happens when enter an expiry date for the batch..
LOBM_VFDAT is the characteristic for expiry date, so i am not supposed to put list of values, it could be any date... but it seems the system is asking to put values in CT04 for this characteristic..
any idea how to solve this?
How to standardize Material description for PR/PO with text items
Hello Experts,
We are in shipbuilding and repairing industry. Here, some PR/PO's (non-stock) are created with text items only but these texts are not the standard ones and the vendor (if he doesn't find it meeting with standard material descriptions) provides the nearest meet of this text items and it results in a different specifications of materials sometimes. So, do we have a way to standardize these material descriptions with some globally acceptable standards?
Please suggest.
Thanks & Regards
Saurabh
How to remove material duplication problem
Hello Experts,
Can you please suggest me is there a way to remove/counter duplication of materials either in standard or in custom developments?
Is it suggestible to buy outside software to trace and remove duplicay issues , I believe SAP must have provided a solution to counter duplication of materials.
I read on SCN @Jurgen L comment:
"We have created own programs that lists potential duplicates based on a fuzzy logic that searches for similar content (not exact matches)
We use this fuzzy logic as well in master data creation process, where we check for potential duplicates before saving, presenting them to the user and asking if he wants to save or use one of the listed potential duplicate"
I need more highlights on it. Kindly help on it.
Thanks & Regards
Saurabh
Problem extending views using MM50
I need to extend the Quality Administration views of 5 HAWA's to a Plant that they're already created. I could do this using MM01, but in a early future i'll need to do the same job (with different type of material) but with many more, so would be nice to use the MM50.
For a start I've listed which materials need this extension, used the SE16N:
(sorry for the language of the system, I don't have all the details in the english version of our SAP)
As seen, i've got these 5 materials that need to be extended to Q.
Went to the MM50 transaction, pasted these materials and selected the Q, but got this error:
I've even set the transaction to list me which materials doesn't have the Quality View, and got only two materials:
Purchase Info Record change using rm06ibi0
Hi All,
I am trying to change the PIR using report program: rm06ibi0
I am getting the following error: "No batch input data for screen SAPMM06I 0102" and then "Transaction error"
Getting this error if I run the program in background process. If I run it in the foreground (just pressing enter) there are no errors.
Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks in advance.
Thank you,
Chandra Indukuri
Error on transaction code S_ALR_87012150
Hi Guys.
(Brazilian localization)
I am facing a big problem after update of Support Package to 605 level 12.
The report of transaction S_ALR_87012150
(fiscal
book, model 1), only brings information by Nota Fiscal if the model of
Nota
Fiscal category is 1 or 22. The other models (55 and 57) is not being
considered in this report (according to the user, those models were
appearing before the Support Package).
Thanks for now.
Vendor Contracts BAPI
I'm writing an LSMW using the below object:
Business Object BUS2014 Purchase contract
Method CREATE Create
Message Type PURCONTRACT_CREATE BAPI to Create a Purchase
Basic Type PURCONTRACT_CREATE01 BAPI to Create a Purchase
My question is:
How do I link the header and item data, there doesn't seem to be a field to show which records match up to which?
reverse a invoice document
Hello everyone,
I need help to reverse an Invoice document. when I try to cancel the invoice I get the following error. "Quantity invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity". invoice was posted wrongly with a different credit note, hence need to reverse it.
request your help on this
Thanks
Ravindra
Non released PRs in MD04
Hi,
Intercompany scenario is as below.
Requesting plant ABC is creating PR with source of supply of production plant XYZ for requirement with PR having release strategy and we can see this requirement in MD04.
Now with this requirement to production plant XYZ after MRP run procurement proposal is created and production plant produce the goods.
Now some times requesting plant reject the PR (Release reject) with some valid reasons and because of this there is overstock in production plant as production is already done.
Is there any setting such that only released PRs are considered as valid requirement in MD04 so that there will be valid requirement for production plant.
Thanks
Sudhir
mass deletion of reservations ?
Hi Gurus,
i want to mass delete of manual reservations. please let me know how to do this. i have tried MBVR but i am not able to Process MBVR. after giving the reservations range i have selected block reservation table level and set delete indicator active. when i click on execute indicator message coming as no changes made.
please let me know the process of mass deletion.
Thanks&Regards,
Mahesh.
Valuated materials Zero value upon issuance
HI Gurus,
I would like to ask for your expertise to have your opinion regarding the scenarios we had encountered in our company. There are transfer materials from inter-company transactions absolutely the price will be carried out. Upon checking it is correct that the price of the material transfer should be in-place in the destination location. But after the users do the Goods Issue(201 movement type) only the material quantity was deducted but the material amount still remain hanging in the GL Account.
As you can see in the image below the amount was no corresponding credit entry. There is no price change was happen.
Could I ask for your help regarding this scenario we had encountered.
thanks and best regard,
weldin
Material Master Extension (T-code: MM50) Issue
Hi,
I have materials created which has just BASIC DATA:1 views.
Now I am trying to extended material with help of T-code : MM50. In MM50 input screen i am populating Maintenance Status : D (MRP) and material no# and executing MM50. In output, i am getting material line ready to extend so I am selecting material and click on "Maintain Materials"
As expected it goes to MRP:1 to MRP:4 views and then asking to save and when i clicked on SAVE it goes Sales : General/Plant views and asking for mandatory fields Trans. Group & Loading Groups and so on.
Question is even though we are not selecting sales views for maintenance in initial screen of MM50, why system goes for sales views and looking for mandatory field to be maintened. Same happens for accounting views.
We are on ECC 6.0. Any help/suggestion ?
Thanks.
Regards,
Ravi.
Program RM06ENMA behaving differently in foreground (ME91F) and in background (wrong no. of expediters)
Hi SAP gurus,
Our client is using a batch job which runs every weekend to send the due reminders/expediters for its POs to its vendors. The batch job is scheduled with the standard program RM06ENMA.
The issue that we are facing is that when this batch job runs, it creates and sends the messages (MAHN) to the user with wrong 'reminder number' for the PO items. For example:
A PO has following 2 items:
item 1: delivery date 20.09.2014 1st reminder 4 days 2nd reminder 6 days and 3rd reminder 10 days
item 2: delivery date 20.09.2014 1st reminder 10 days 2nd reminder 15 days and 3rd reminder 20 days
condition record for MAHN is maintained with time 4 'immediate'.
With reference date 25.09.2014, program RM06ENMA should send only the first reminder for the 1st item BUT when we run a job with this program, it actually sends 2nd reminder for the 1st item and 1st reminder for the 2nd item.
Very strangely, if we run the same program in foreground it is working absolutely fine as per the expected way.
One observation that we have made while testing the same in quality environment is that if we change the time in the condition record for MAHN from 4 to 3 (application's own transaction), then the batch job to create the MAHN messages (expediters) works fine. But in this case too, if we use another batch job to output the waiting MAHN messages, the value in field 'number of expediters sent' in the PO items again get changed absurdly. We have observed cases where the number of expediters sent changed from 2 to 0.
Has anyone come across such an issue.
Thanks!
Rahul Sharma