Hi,
AP has notified certain Payment terms need to be blocked from allowing its usage.
We do not want to delete such payment terms.
We have added Do not use in the text of such payment terms.
While entering PO, we allow users to change the payment terms. Is there a way we can prevent users from using the payment terms labelled as "Do not use"??
Please guide.
Thanks,
Shilpa
Hi All,
We have Funds Management active.
We use transaction ML81N.
Sometimes, budget becomes exceeded and during saving of service entry(ML81N), we can go to the error log.
In error log, message only states that budget has been exceeded but there are no details on the error such as funds center, commitment item, funded program. So it is difficult to check/resolve budget errors encountered in ML81N.
Does anyone know a workaround/SAP Note for this?
There is a blog regarding this but no SAP Note is provided.
Regards,
Hi Experts
Please let us know what are the config steps involve in ECC for GTS( Global Trade Service) in procurement process .
Many thanks .
Regards
Suvendu
Dear Experts,
I am getting below error while doing Good receipt against subcontracting material PO. Where as in both material i have maintained profit center 1301 & 1300 company code is maintained for this profit center.
I don't understand that from where this 1601 profit center is coming in picture.
Message no. KM183
Profit center 1601 cannot receive postings in company code 1300.
The posting was canceled.
If you want to post to profit center 1601 in company code 1300, this company code must be activated for profit center 1601 in master data maintenance, on the tab page Company code.
You should also carry out the transaction Change Profit Center.
Regards,
Milind Kadam
i read in one blog that "Cost Center values (CEBAN-KOSTL) and Vendor values (CEBAN-LIFNR) in the release strategy characteristics should be entered with leading zeros."
i wanted to know the meaning of above text.
Regards
Nitin Gupta
Hello All,
We need to maintain ind/coll req as 2 on some materials for which we need to create STO. We are moving project stock (Q) to another location using STO. The ATP always fails when the individual / collective requuirement is 2 in MRP 4 view. Can we tweak ATP settings (ch group , ch rule, scope of check ) so that ATP will be fine.
The reason why we maintain ind/coll req as 2 is that sometimes these materials are components in a subcontract PO. The stock for these materials for the subcontrating process is always maintained at the vendor. If ind/coll is NOT maintained as 2 then this shows up as project stock (Q) in the component list in subcon PO and then goods issue fails as the stock is not in project stock but at the vendor.
Is there any way to get around this issue. Thanks
Atul
Hi,
We are trying to post an Inbound IDOC with receiving bank details (segment E1EDK28) filled in. The document was posted succesfully, however we are not able to see those details on the invoice document posted. Where should we look for that info in MIR4 ?
Any thoughts/ suggestions pls ?
Regards,
V
Hello MM gurus,
We have a peculiar problem, this typically happens only in the beginning of the year, since the accounting dept wants anything GR-ed in previous year(December) should have MIRO invoices posted to December too, eventhough we are already in January of new year, apparently to comply with US-GAAP, and not get into trouble with auditors. The error mentioned in the title does not appear for all postings to previous period, only in certain cases. What I feel is it seems to typically appear when there is not enough stock coverage(already mostly used up) with respect to the quantity on the invoice,and also the invoiced amount is less than the PO amount(discount from vendor). Any idea why this happens? Is it anything to do with the revaluation document type not set up for MIRO in config in OMR4? This error does go away if you post to the current month, only happens if you post to the previous period, and during the rest of the year the accounting dept does not insist on posting invoices to the previous period(anything that was GR-ed in previous period), hence they never have to deal with it.
In below example the actual PO amount was 2551.5, but we are entering the MIRO invoice only for 2103.75, see simulation screenshot below.
Below the error that shows up in messages..
Do you think we are missing any configuration? Any help is greatly appeciated.
Thanks and regards,
Wayfarer
Hello, we are currently having a couple of issues that seem to be related to a setting on the users account for PR's.
Scenario #1: User goes to ME57 to process PR's that are on a Contract/Scheduling agreement. When clicking Process Assignment, ALL of the PR's that are assigned to that supplier are being populated as selected and are automatically pulled into the shopping cart. This causes problems if maybe only 5 of 10 PRs are desired. Most other users do not have them auto-filling into the PO/Shopping cart, they usually drag and drop the PRs from the Document Overview On section.
Scenario #2: Same User goes to ME41 to create an RFQ. Inputs the PR number under the Create With Reference to PR option. When the PR number is entered, the Adopt Details section already has the PR line item highlighted. Normal usuers have to select this line and then click Adopt Details.
Question for Scenario #1: is there a way to keep the PRs from auto-filling into the PO field from ME57 into ME21N when processing PRs from ME57?
Question for Scenario #2: is there a way to keep PRs from auto-selecting on ME41 when creating an RFQ?
Since both of these issues are related to the population of PR data into a PO/RFQ we thought maybe it was related to a setting on this users SAP account.
Thanks in advance!
Hi experts,
We need to change report MC.9 to display key-figures by movement type. We don't want that system take into account stock transfers between plants for the key figure "total usage"
We tried to create a copy of info structures S031 (S531 standard), S032 (S532 type C) and S039 (S539 type D) as described in note 483735, but when we assign S531 and S532 to S539 the system generates an error message saying that characteristics are not identical.
Please, could you help me?
Thanks in advance,
Marcos
Hi,
Can someone please explain the difference betwene the PO based IV and GR based IV?
Why one is better then other?
Can we have both ways in one system?
Sincerely,
Khan
Hello All,
I have few doubt regarding stock type field in MIGO.
How many stock type are available?
Do we have special stock type option in stock type field in item detail of MiGO screen?
With regards
Manoj
Hello,
Could anyone of you please tell me, how to default the Invoice Receipt check in PO. When I am doing migo against any PO, its not allowing me to do so giving an error message "Document XXXXXXXX does not contain any selectable item". Please help me in this regards.
Dear experts
This is a problem I have read a lot about, but none of the answers work properly and I wanted to create a new thread in order to try to compile a final answer for this problem (at least in version 6.0)
As you know Standar SAP uses posting date as translation date in MIRO for foreign currency.
This is not always true (imagine Crude Imports with 3 dates: Invoice date, posting date and Bill of Lading date. The last one happens to be the fiscal date for exchange rate in my county and the other two are also mandatory).
I am proposing thus to use 3 dates: Document date as invoice date; posting date as posting date and Invoice Receipt Date
(REINDAT - RBKP) as Bill of Lading date. I would like to implement this third date as translation date.
Lot of ways to do it, but none works properly as for the end user it is complicated to enter data in a certain way so that BADI's work properly. I have implemented note 574583 and only works with some restrictions.
I have also used some more BADI's like MRM_HEADER_CHECK, FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE, INVOICE_UPDATE,... and all of them have some restrictions (depending always in data header taps data introduction).
I would really appreciate if anyone could help with this, ensuring that the Badi get's always the data and makes it work with no screen selection dependance.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Experts ,
Our company has decided to build a new plant (X1) and move all the operations from existing plant (X2) to this new plant , then shut down this X1 Plant.This new plant is located in new country .
1)My question is from the order management /Logistics part what things I have to take care of .
2) Until the new plant is fully operational , XI plant will be active and after 6 months this old plant will be fully shutdown . So during this interim period what thing I need to maintain or what things I need to care .
Thanks
MM_sD
i was doing miro and after saving the invoice was blocked automatically and it normally occurs whenever vat is added at the miro stage but when a vat is not added the invoice is free for payment.
Can anyone tell me how to make validity dates visible on framework requisitions in ME51N? I don't see those fields in the field selection key for ME51N in configuration. The fields are in field selection key FOB, but it's not clear to me how to use that key to format the input fields when creating framework requisitions.
Thanks.
Hello everyone!
A quick question Is it possible to have serial numbers for materials without having PM or CS?
Thank you,
Hi Folks
We have a requirement , that the Material Po text maintained in Material master should be changebale in PO in SAP
Please do advice on how the same can be done.
I have looked at the option Copying rule for item text - Text linkages however was not able to fnd an option for the same
Thanks
Dear Friends,
In this document I have listed the possible accounting entries that can be achievable by using standard configuration in MM pricing procedure.
In this example I have taken a condition type similar to Freight condition type FRA1 and made changes to Condition Class, Condition category, Plus/Minus, Accrual Indicator & statistical indicator in calculation schema.
| SNO | Condition Class | Condition Category | Plus/ Minus | Accrual Indicator (M/06) | Statistical Indicator (M/08) | Statistical Ind in PO for that condition (Display only) | Qty in PO | Gross Price in PO | Condition Value in PO(%) | Net price after this condition | Accounting Entries at GR | Accounting Entries at LIV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | A(Discounts/ Surcharges) | B (Delivery Costs) | plus | X | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 120 Cr Gr/ir 100 Cr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 Cr Ven 120 |
| 2 | A | B | plus | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 120 Cr Gr/ir 100 Cr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 Cr Ven 120 | |
| 3 | A | B | plus | 1 | 100 | 20% | 120 | Dr mat 120 Cr Gr/ir 120 | Dr Gr/ir 120 Cr Ven 120 | |||
| 4 | A | Blank | plus | 1 | 100 | 20% | 120 | Dr mat 120 Cr Gr/ir 120 | Dr Gr/ir 120 Cr Ven 120 | |||
| 5 | A | Blank | plus | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 120 Cr Gr/ir 100 Cr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 Cr Ven 120 | |
| 6 | A | Blank | plus | X | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 120 Cr Gr/ir 100 Cr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 Cr Ven 120 |
| 7 | A | Blank | minus | X | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 80 Cr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Cr Vn 100 |
| 8 | A | Blank | minus | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 80 Cr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Cr Vn 100 | |
| 9 | A | Blank | minus | 1 | 100 | 20% | 80 | Dr mat 80 Cr Gr/ir 80 | Dr Gr/ir 80 Cr Vn 80 | |||
| 10 | A | B | minus | Not allowed to use this condition in PO | ||||||||
| 11 | A | F (Freight) | minus | 1 | 100 | 20% | 80 | Dr mat 80 Cr Gr/ir 80 | Dr Gr/ir 80 Cr Vn 80 | |||
| 12 | A | F | minus | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 80 Cr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Cr Vn 100 | |
| 13 | A | F | minus | X | X | X | 1 | 100 | 20% | 100 | Dr mat 80 Cr Gr/ir 100 Dr G/L 20 | Dr Gr/ir 100 Cr Vn 100 |
Where Mat is Stock account,
Gr/ir is GR/IR clearing account
G/L is G/L Account assigned to Accruel TEK
Ven is Vendor Account
There are always a different kinds of requirements from finance people about FI postings. If any such requirement which was not satisfied by above configuration please comment here. Also comment possible workarounds for such common requirements. Please also mention if I have missed some other standard configuration possibilities of Different G/L posting.
-End Of Document
Thanks For Reading. Please share your reviews & feedback.... 
Regards
Satish