Hi,
I need to upload a external file with the materials forecast, through the transaction MPR1, but do not know how the input file in this transaction.
I have not found usage description of this transaction on the internet.
Any help is welcome.
Thank you.
How can i benefit from partner roles ?
Vendor can be related with Payee , Invoicing party , Goods Supplier and Ordering Address.
There are a lot of usage for Partner Roles like a Invoicing party for incoming invoice (Partner role IP), Alternative payee (Partner role AZ), Intrastat declaration (Partner role GS), Address determination for return deliveries (Partner role GS), Message determination (Partner role OA) , Price determination (Partner role IP).
Define Settings for Vendor Master Records :
Firstly , configure your 'Vendor Account Group' for Partner determination procedure.
SPRO / Logistics - General / Business Partner / Vendors / Control / Define Account Groups and Field Selection (Vendor)
** For instance , i used a vendor master 'T-K55001' also i maintained Partner Function datas in master data.
DP : Default partner
** After that specify partner role VN is allowed for account group ZVMU.
SPRO / Materials Management / Purchasing / Partner Determination / Partner Roles / Define Permissible Partner Roles per Account Group
SPRO / Materials Management / Purchasing / Partner Determination / Partner Settings in Purchasing Documents / Define Partner Schemas
Select partner schema 0002 and choose Partner Functions under the Procedure node in the Dialog Structure tree. The End indicator means that partner determination for this role does not take place until the purchase order is checked or saved. The other partner roles were determined as soon as you entered the vendor and choose Continue
** If partners are not maintained at the plant or vendor sub-range level and the Higher Level indicator is selected, the system searches for partners at the purchasing organization level.
** If you do not select the indicator, the partner roles are determined when a purchasing document is created.
Implementation : I set a discount for Invoicing party. MEKJ tcode will help us.
** If a partner role is found at the end, the system does not update the prices.
I created a PO to Vendor , but discount is implementable for Invoicing Party.
Also , check refers ...
Business Partner Master Data Structure - Business Partner Master Data (LO-MD-BP) - SAP Library
Vendors: Partner Determination - Master Data - SAP Library
Partner Roles in Purchasing - Purchasing (MM-PUR) - SAP Library
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal
Hi All,
I have a problem with some invoices which are blocked for price variance. They are not automatically released by MRBR even after adjusting the PO price and its showing a message M8656 - Blocking reasons deleted in 0 lines.
When I posted a dummy material document and invoice document with price variance for a PO, the invoice is getting blocked but the blocking reason is shown as invalid in MRBR and they are releasing even without adjusting PO price. For some of the invoices the blocking reason is shown as Blocked and they are not getting released even after changing the price.
Can we release the pricing block manually or will it have any impact if we release those invoices manually only for payment?
Thanks,
Chandu.
Dear Experts,
I would seek your expertise in order to resole the below issue.
We have created a service purchase contract for Rs. 10,000/- and created a purchase order with reference to the contract for Rs. 1,000/- and completed purchasing process with SES, MIRO & Payment activities. After completion of all the above steps vendor has sent us the credit note for Rs. 500/- and we have posted the same with reference to the purchase order and it has updated in the purchase order history as well.
Here my actual consumption for the contract is Rs. 500/- (1000 PO – 500 Credit Note) and the contract should allow me to create a purchase order for Rs. 9,500/-, but the issue is when I’m trying to create a purchase order for Rs. 9,500/-, the system is throwing me an error message as PO value exceeding the contract value for Rs. 500/-. It means the system is not considering the credit note for the contract value calculation.
I hope I'm clear in explaining the issue, kindly revert for the more information.
Thanks & Regards,
Narayana N
Hi everybody, here is my case.
I have a plant with two storage locations, for example: PLANT1, with storage location 0001 and 0010.
So right now I have PO's for both storage locations. But on february I have to make the storage location 0010 stop receiving PO's.
However the storage location must continue receiving the ones that were already created.
Does anyone know if it's possible to do this? Also I would like to prevent the people that are creating the PO's to post them in the storage location 0010?
Thanks, best regards
MB
Dear Experts,
Please let me know the options to change 2nd language Material description for multiple materials at once.I have tried in MM17 but seems that need to change one by one. Or is there any way that I can replace the 2nd language materials description with 1st Language material description.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi
Dear All,
i have manage to go su21 to create under mm purchasing authorization object called Y_BEST_LOC with Acty and LGORT field. other than that i have insert check item under program RM06ENHI. after that i go to su24 to assign the transaction code check for me21 and me22. under field value for me21, my new object i want to assign value (interval) = $LGORT, but don;t know how so i leave it blank.
Come to user profile i adding this object into the authorization to check, and put in only allow for 0001 and 0002 location. But the user still can save the PO when choose 0004 without error. I want to know missing step that should be done to prevent certain user to order under 0004 storage location.
Kindly suggest and guide me. thanks in advance
Regards
Aishah
The end-user has several prices for similar type of service but only one service master record is maintained.
The end-user does not want to maintain different service master records as it'd be tedious process now.
The problem is:
PR is created with the same service number but different prices are quoted.
When converting this PR into PO, the price from the first line item is defaulted for all line items with same service number.
How to solve this issue so that the price comes from each line of PR into each line of PO ?
Dear Experts,
We think the following senario.
1) Entry Goods Issue by using T-cd:MIGO (moving type:101 without PO number)
2) PO is created automatically by GR
3) SO is created automatically by IDOC which was generated by PO.
But PO doesn't have information of Output Determination and IDOC was not created.
Is this normal action of SAP ERP?
And we specified Confirmation Control on purchase inforamtion master.
But PO doesn't have Confirmation Control.
Is this normal action of SAP ERP, too ?
When we created PO manually, PO have information of Output Determination
and Confirmation Control.
Best Regards,
Kiyofumi Tanaka
Hello,
I am looking for a solution to update the materials consumption from the forecasting view.
I found 200547 note and 1169623 note but they require ABAP programming.
Does anyone knows a standard solution which doesn't require programming?
Or is there a report or something which can do a retroactiveupdate? So that values can be calculated by the system not by the user.
Regards,
Daniela Butnar
Dear Experts,
Material is produced with the production batch and SLED date in the batch in the production plant
STO is created between production plant and depot, outbound delivery is done, PGI is done with respect to the production batch.
MIGO is done with respect to outbound delivery.
During MIGO the SLED date can be seen in the batch tab of the line item till we check the document. Once the document is saved or posted the SLED date is not updated in the SLED field of the line item in the batch tab.
This is not happening all the time, This is happening very rarely.
This issue is only in the Production system. this issue is not occuring is DEV, Quality, and Test systems.
kindly let me know why this is happening and how to resolve this.
if you need any further information, kindly reply.
thanks in advance.
Hi Sir
I Have Read All About User-Exit There Part , But I Don't Have The Knowledge In MM Consaltant Work Before Abap team write code
Pl z Give me Any Example
Thanks & Regards,
Lavakumar.
Hi Experts
While running MRP with MD01 the requisition is not created but with MD02 the requisition is created .
Please advice how to run the MRP at plant level .
Many thanks .
Regards
Suvendu
Moderator message: Basic frequently asked question - Please search forum for answers and read the docu in help.sap.com
128 hits when searching SCN with a few words from you tiny issue description: MD01 no requisition MD02 MRP
See as well our rules of engagement: http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-18590
A good way to search the forum is with google. See this blog with details for a good search
This blog describes how to use the SCN search: http://scn.sap.com/community/about/blog/2012/12/04/how-to-use-scn-search
The discussions are not a replacement for proper training
Thread locked
Message was edited by: Jürgen L
Dear All,
I try to update ekpo-ean11 from IF_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST~PROCESS_ITEM. Inside the BADI the value is updated - but somewhere the value is lost.
From SAP documentation I understood that BAPI_PO_CREATE cannot change this information (OSS Note1896104). It is the same available for BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST?
Have you updated this information from another UEx?
Regards,
Florina R
Dear Experts,
I want to create return PO for that I have maintained following settings.
1] SPRO>MM>PURCHASING>RETURN PO
PUR. DOC .CATEG-F
PUR DOC TYPE-NB
SUPPLYSING PLANT-PSML
DELIVERY TYEP-RL.
2] Ticked on return vendor in vendor master purchasing view.
3] Sales view of material extended.
4] Also checked shipping point detemination setting & according maintained data in customer & material master.
But when i trying to create return PO i getting following error.
No shipping data could be found for item 00010
Message no. ME393
Diagnosis
The system attempted to determine certain shipping data for returns item
00010 (e.g. the responsible sales organization and the shipping point).
However, the system was not able to find the relevant information.
Possible reasons:
o The vendor's customer number does not exist
o The material master record does not exist or has been flagged for
deletion
o The data on the sales organization, the distribution channel or the
division is missing for the plant
o a shipping point could not be determined
Plz advice
Hi all!
We are having a problem with J1AX transaction regarding last purchase order price determination.
We activate inflation at company level, so we can see in material master records the corresponding button in Accounting 2 view. We create an inflation class for materials and assigned this to the particular material we are testing.
We create a Purchase Order for the testing material, a goods receipt for total quantity was posted, and then we posted a good issue for a partial quantity. Invoice verification was executed and posted.
Then we run J1AX transaction (background mode) and the PO is identified but there is not data base updating. The message is: "Not valid price found".
We need your help to solve this!
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Eliana
Hi,
Here is an issue somwhere between MM and BC (workflow).
Let be a PO created by BUYER (= Sap User) which is not subject to a release strategy sent out to vendor - the sender seen by the vendor in his mailbox is BUYER.
Now when the same PO is subject to a release strategy and workflow applied to PO release activity performed by MANAGER (=Sap User) - the sender seen by the vendor in his mailbox is now MANAGER.
My issue: MANAGER will not be involved in PO follow up with the vendor for the second case of PO and thus should not be shown in the process. A release is an internal (and possibly confidential) process not to be communicated outside the company.
Question: how can I avoid suche side-effect?
Backgroung information: I re-use a standard workflow template WS2...75, SAP is ECC6.
Is there any way to update the prices of Scheduling Agreement automatically when the price is updated in Info record?.
Thanks
In our organization, we have one purchasing group and multiple company codes/plants. If a user creates a PO to another company code/plant, everything works OK until invoice time. The invoices appear to be generating a cross company code document instead of just generating the invoice in the company code/plant on the PO. This is OK with most of our PO's, but for one particular company code/plant, the vendor side needs to be on that company code, not the main one. Obviously, if the vendor does not exist for that particular company code, it would need to be set up.
I looked at message M8 393 and saw that the message was suppressed. I can change it to a warning but wanted to make sure I am looking at this correctly.
Does anyone know how the process should actually take place? Why is the message not coming up normally if the PO is in one company code but the MIRO screen has the main company code/plant?
While the PO has one company code/plant, is it standard SAP to generate a cross company code invoice.
Monique
hi experts
What is the purpose of EAN/UPC number in material master?
WHether one material can have more EAN/UPC number? If use more EAN/UPC number what is the significance or benefit in business.
Can some body explain in detail about this ?
Thanks