Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

PO items becomes 'free'

April 7, 2016, 10:58 pm
$
0
0

First of all i wanna thank for your patience to my poor english.

 

Working with Retail.

Mostly, we are using PO's to make goods movement between different site's attached to different company code's, and there is no any problems. But sometimes we need to create PO for goods movement between two different site's attached to one company code and add some extra conditions in that PO's header. When i'm creating that sort of order system marking items as free by default. It comes with obvious consequences: there is no conditions for free items, all parameters of invoicing unmarked. After i filled my PO with items, i'm unmarking 'free' flags on items manually, go to save after that and here problem appears! While saving PO, system returns 'free' flags on random items (1 or 2 usually from PO containing 10 - 15 items). In a result i have an order with conditions in header that applyed only to 'no free' items, and this is not good because users usually misses this situation.


All i wrote is true for ME21N, but goes ok for ME21.


Asking for help in finding a way to teach ME21N how not to mark items as 'free' by it self. Or how to configurate system in such a way that items will not be 'free' by default on movements between two sites attached to one company code.

↧
Search

purchase inforecord is not found in purchase organisation at Mi

October 21, 2009, 12:12 am
$
0
0

Dear

In consignment process i've create purchase inforecord wrt purchaseorg & plant

athen ive create a po with item catagory K

 

At the time of migo

error message comes purchase inforecord is not found in purchase organisation

 

Pls Guide

 

Regards

Amin

↧
↧

Authorization objects for PO report

April 19, 2016, 7:14 pm
$
0
0

Good day,

 

My current requirement is to limit what PO can be displayed to the user using the ME2N, ME2K etc. series of reports for purchaseorders.

We already have created a variant to properly filter only the PO that should be visible. However, users can still display the details of any PO in the system if they change fields or do not use a variant.

 

Ideally, we would like to limit the user's ability to view only those PO assigned to their cost centers.

 

Noel

↧

MCBA Valuated Stock Logic?

April 19, 2016, 3:49 pm
$
0
0

When I run the MCBA report I am entering the Plant, Material Group, and Month.

 

Since the report is run for a whole month and not for a specific day, how is this field calculated?

 

The stock can change multiple times during a month, or even during a day, so when this field returns a value of, for example, "10," what is the logic behind that value?

↧

Copy PO: NB to ZB

April 19, 2016, 8:13 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Is there any possibilty to copy a PO (NB (Standard PO) to ZB (Co. to Co. PO)).

If I work with the Document Overview the whole content of the NB is copied, but for the ZB it is a different vendor as well as pricing is different.

Any idea how to manage?

Best practice would be to have it automated, meaning once the NB is created the ZB is automatically created with exact quantites per order line as stated/order in the NB. But also if there is an easy manual workaround I would appreciate your hints/ideas.

 

Thanks and best regards

Tash

↧
↧

Inbound delivery is not created when outbound delivery is created with Batch Split

March 31, 2016, 6:41 am
$
0
0

Issue: In ICPO process we are are facing an issue,  when outbound delivery is created with batch split and output type SPED is triggered after GI, this output type is not creating inbound delivery. confirmation control is maintained and configuration is also maintained correctly.

 

 

Please let us any of them have solution for the issue.

 

Thanks

Raju C D

↧

MRP Project PR ISSUE

April 16, 2016, 3:58 am
$
0
0

Hello experts,

 

 

                I have one issue that my client generated project PR successfully  through MRP with tcode MD51. but the next day they the PR no. is not exist. the same i have also checked and found similar issue, whereas the normal pr process is running ok.

 

I have checked number range of PR it is also ok,

 

Please suggest immediate.

 

 

Regards,

Sanjay Verma

↧

Quota Arrangement - Minimum Qty Split

April 19, 2016, 9:39 am
↧
Search

Trouble Shooting Tips for Output Issue in PO

April 20, 2016, 12:44 am
$
0
0

     

     When creating or changing a purchasing document the message determination will

be always processed to find out if an output message can be created at header level.

But sometimes, the output determination is not working well. In this blog, I will share

some tips about trouble shooting for output issue in PO.


1.  No output message was created automatically

   a. Try with standard settings

    b. Are partners correctly determined?

    c. If reproducible with standard settings, check the configuration.



2.  Wrong output message appears by default

   a. Try with standard settings

    b. If reproducible with the standard settings go to header/message, goto/determination

        analysis. You’ll see where the message is coming from. See the following example.

Picture1.png

    c. Are partners correctly determined?

    d. Check the configuration.


3. The message is not processed, get a red cross or/and red light in header/message.

    a. Go to header/messages/ processing log, look at the error message

     b. Try with standard settings.

     c. Check that there is no release strategy. If there is one, the purchasing document

         needs to be fully release before being able to process it.

     d. If processing time is 4, try with 3.

     e. Check the configuration.


4. change message - problem to create it or to process it.

     a. A change message is created automatically if you change a field and if you have the
         following settings in place:  For output type NEU you have Prog: FM06AEND and

         Form routine: CHANGE_FLAG.

       1.png

         You should have one line with output type and the require operation for change.

          2.png

         MM/Purchasing/Messages/Output control/ Message determination schema/assign

         schema to …: ‘M’ should be flagged.


    b. Two ways to repeat messages: Go to ME22N and Go to header/message,

        select the message you want to repeat and press ‘repeat output’. Then Go to

        ‘Message output’ transaction (e.g. ME9F for Pos) to output the message.

        The other way is Go to ‘Message output’ transaction (e.g. ME9F) and execute

        with ‘processing status’ = 1, Select the correct line + click on ‘messagedetails’.

        Select the correct output message + click on ‘repeat output’. Click 'Save' and return

        to the initialME9F screen and execute it again with ‘processing status’ = 10.



Hope these information can be helpful.

↧
↧

Auto determine Incoterm "location"

April 19, 2016, 11:58 pm
$
0
0

Hi all,

Already googled this, and all you will get is the determine Incoterm field, not the "Incoterm Location".

I'm on S4HANA 1511 FPS01 where Vendor and Customer is replaced by Business Partner.

I did the usual with ECC6, maintain the Incoterm Location (LFM1-INCO2_L) at the BP - Vendor and at Inforecord, both does not auto determine during PO.

Any ideas?

 

SCN 02 Incoterm part 1.jpg

SCN 02 Incoterm part 3.jpg

SCN 02 Incoterm part 2.jpg

↧

Table A018 shows only one condition item

April 14, 2016, 5:44 am
$
0
0

I want to extract the conditions from PIR so from tanle A018 I am selecting a condition type and extracting the field KNUMH which I use to find data in KONP.

the problem is that table A018, only recognizes the first item of the conditions in the PIR;

if the PIR has 2 conditions items, A018 does not recognize the second.

in the screenshot you can see an example of what I mean.

one screenshot is from PIR, second from table A018

↧

CONREL - U1 STO MRP element

April 20, 2016, 1:55 pm
$
0
0

Newly created STO show a U1 - CONREL MRP element in MD04 but I find no corresponding demand element in RESB.  Reporting (query) off of RESB but the STO demand is not present so it does not completely reflect planning situation.

 

Where can I see the supply (demand) side of the STO document to report it as a demand element along with reservations and dependent requirements from RESB?

 

Thanks!

 

Patrick

↧

Default output type for contract

April 1, 2016, 10:43 am
$
0
0

Hello Everyone,

 

We have ZNEU output type for contract. This is to send email to vendor.

 

All the configurations are done for this output type.

 

If I manually add this output type to contract the email is getting send but we need to default this output type when user creates the contract or change it.

 

I have searched related forums for this and followed all the configuration settings and seems like all the configuration is maintained but the output type is not getting defaulted for contracts. Below are some screenshots from NACE transactions. Can anyone one please help me to default this output type for contract ?

n1.jpg

n2.jpg

n3.jpg

n4.jpg

n5.jpg

Thanks,

Khushbu.

↧
↧

material master deletion for a particular sales organisation

April 28, 2009, 11:34 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I want to delete all the material master which are created in a particular sales organisation.

 

Means user should be able to create sales order with that material nor user able to bill the existing sales order of that material.

 

Regards,

SATYA

↧

Qty Variance not working within tolerance limits if GR-Bsd IV check box is flagged in the PO

April 20, 2016, 8:27 am
$
0
0

Hi ,

 

We have set Upper and Lower Absolute tolerance limit as 100 for tolerance key DQ but when PO Qty # 100 , PO Price # 100, GR Qty # 50 and IR Qty # 51,then still system shows information message at the time of MIRO it is block for Payment and it is update payment block R in payment details tab.

in this case GR-Bsd IV check box is flagged in the PO.

 

 

GR-Bsd check in po.JPG

 

GR-Bsd check box TICK IN PO.JPG

 

But , when we did same scenario but only we have removed GR-Bsd IV check box in the PO then system not block for payment. i.e. not shows block for payment at the of time.

 

No GR-Bsd iv in po.JPG

 

 

No GR-Bsd IV check in PO.JPG

Why system considered Qty variance if it is within tolerance limit.

 

It is like that system only considering Qty Variance if there is no GR-Bsd check in the PO.

 

How we can set 50% tolerance limit for Qty Variance.

 

 

Kindly provide your valuable inputs.

↧
Search

PR closures if PR is linked to sales order

April 20, 2016, 10:31 pm
$
0
0

Dear Sir,

 

Need Help in closing the PR.

 

I have a situation where I have to close the PR.I have enabled the close field in PR.When i check the closed box ,PR gets closed.

But since this is linked to sales order,When i run MRP ,it again create a new PR .

My client is in retail industry and they have jewellery as their product.So they work on POS.where they create the sales order.

If I have to cancel the sales order ,so that new PR does not pops up,I need to close the sales order at POS.

I tried doing this from POS as well,but still on MRP run PR is getting created.

 

Can someone please help me.How do i close the PR .so that next time at MRP runs I do not receive new PR's.

 

Thanks

↧

Physical Inventory Process with Pre-Printed Tag Numbers

April 20, 2016, 10:36 am
$
0
0

We are in the initial stage of implementing R/3.  I am new to SAP, and have a question about the process of conducting a physical inventory.  In previous systems, we purchased a bulk of inventory tags, with pre-printed tag numbers.  Other than the tag number, it was basically a blank tag.  We then distributed those tags to our team members for counting, and then keyed those tags into the system.  There could be multiple tags for the same material number and location (see example below).

 

Tag #Material No.LocationQty
100ABC111005
101ABC111003
102ABC211004
104ABC311008
105ABC1110010
106ABC112006

  

Once the tag entry was complete, the system would sum the material, by location (from above ex. ABC1 = 18 in location 1100), and compare that to the system, and generate variance reports.

 

This was a standard procedure in the previous system we used, but I'm not able to determine if this is possible now.  It seems that we can only have one count per material and location.  Which means we would need to use a separate system (i.e. Excel) for totaling the material, by location, first, and then entering that into SAP.  Or at least I haven't determined if this is possible now.

 

Is it possible to use this same process in SAP?

↧
↧

Transaction MC.A - inlcudes zero material movements

April 20, 2016, 11:35 am
$
0
0

Since upgraded from 4.7 to 6.0, MC.A transaction and a number of other LIS reports includes materials for which there is no movement.Is there

a way to exclude these? The preference would be to only display the relevant materials.Is there a setting in the info structure to

exclude zero movements?

 

Please help me.

 

 

Regards

Vinodram

↧

Grn posted in last fiscal year and cancelled in next fiscal year, how to clear open balance in GR/IR??

April 20, 2016, 4:37 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

Help me to resolve below inconsistency.

 

Goods receipt was posted in 31.03.2016 but reversed in 01.04.2016 by mistake.

 

Because of this GR IR clearing for this entry cant be performed.

 

How to clear the open item in this scenario?

↧

Problem with purchase order release prerequisite

April 21, 2016, 1:34 am
$
0
0

Hi,

I have a problem to understund the customzing for the SAP purchase order release scenario and would be thankfull if anyone could help me.

 

There are 3 release code T1, T2 and KY.

Before KY can release the purchase order T1 or T2 must release it.

 

The goal is to get the following release status

 

T1T2KYStatus
not released
Xnot released
Xnot released
XXreleased
XXreleased

 

The problem is, that I can't manage to customize the Code\release prerequisites the right way.

At the moment I have the following setting, but for final release I have to use all 3 codes now.

 

T1T2KY
T1######
T2#####
KYXX######

 

release status

 

T1T2KYStatus
not released
Xnot released
Xnot released
XXreleased
XXXreleased

 

 

Am I doing something wrong or is it not possible to have such configuration?

Do I have to create an extra releas code T12 and assign it to all involved users?

 

 

Thanks in advance

 

Christoph

↧
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>