Dear MM Experts,
Do we any solution to block vendor account group ?
I have checked no of threads in SCN but not found any suitable thread.
Please guide me how to proceed ?
Dear MM Experts,
Do we any solution to block vendor account group ?
I have checked no of threads in SCN but not found any suitable thread.
Please guide me how to proceed ?
Hi,
How can we restrict goods receipt if purchase order is not approved. If PO is set for Release Strategy till 100,000 USD and if person creates purchase order more than 100,000 USD then how he will he able to perform Goods Receipt for the same.
Thanks,
Abhijit
Hi ,
When Invoice (MIRO) comes under any variance like Qty,Price,Delivery date etc., Payment block "R"is updated in the invoice and system shows message Invoice XXX is block for payment.
But we have requirement like , We need to remove R block settings in the invoice, even it is falls under tolerance limit.
We remove all tolerance values from tolerance keys , it is working for some keys but not for all the keys like DQ (Qty Variance)
There is any another way.
Kindly provide your valuable inputs.
OMR6 : Change View Tolerance Limits.
MIR4 : Display Invoice Doc.
MRBR : Released block invoices
Dear all,
I have a situation here.
As an example, in PO AAA, it has 1 PO item which has quantity of 100 EA
Hence, only 1 piece of label will be generated after posting MIGO.
Usually during receiving, the goods may come as 10 boxes containing 10 EA each. Thus, 10 Boxes X 10 EA = 100 EA.
So, during receiving, it tally with the PO item.
My question is, can SAP cater to generate multiple label for 1 PO item.
As an example, SAP may generated 5 label for that 1 particular PO item(100 EA)
So the result will be as below :
The quantity of each label will be the same. Just instead on each label, it will indicate the value ( 1 of 5 and so on). "1 of 5" means the item for 100 EA has 5 boxes total.
So, is SAP can cater this type of situation? If can, could any help me to setup this setting in SAP.
Dear Experts,
I am facing an issue where the scheduling agreement has been released , but again resetting even though no changes have been made, and the user has to again get the approval. I kindly Request you to provide me suggestions to solve this issue
Thanking you,
Mridula
Hello -
I am trying to determine the best method by which I should handle this special instance of Sales Order Stock... here is the situation below.
I have material (can be either make-to-order or buy-to-order - point is it is a configured product) that was created as part of Sales Order X.
Customer cancels Sales Order X after product is confirmed / received into Sales Order Stock (specific to order X)
but PRIOR to it shipping. The stock cannot be easily allocated to other orders as it is configured product, and I do not want to put the stock on our shelves as unrestricted, general stock because that can get confusing. I do however want the financial impact of maintain the inventory addressed at the time of the cancellation as opposed to when the material obsoletes and becomes devalued several months / years later. In other words, I want to maintain the stock in the event it can be resold, however I also want it devaluated at the time of the cancellation so all financial transactions associated with the cancellation are captured at the time the cancellation is received.
The only process by which I think this is possible if via a scrap transaction of the sales order stock (MVMT 552E) and then some kind of receipt into returns stock (one of the 650 series return delivery maybe?) Is there a simple de-valuating transfer I can do in one shot or is this the only way I can accomplish BOTH the devaluation as well as the moving into a non-MRP driven, non-Sales Order associated location?
Is there an entirely different suggested method by which this situation can be processed in SAP? I'm relatively new to SAP and this forum, so I apologize if this is a simple solution and I don't know it!
Any assistance would be appreciated!
Hello,
When I create a stock transfer order (ME21n - UB) I want to maintian in tab 'Partners', Function 'LF', but I only have the option to chose between 2 predefined partner functions. How can I add extra functions?
Thanks!
Hi Expertt
To do repacking process, when done Goods receipt (MIGO) immediately need to create automatic subcontract PO.
if any enhancement is available Please suggest.
Regards
karan
Hello Gurus,
I have a situation, where one of the user been able to change/update the Outbound delivery for other location or plant.
Here is the situation :
User A is located in North America and he has been assigned with North America plants/CC/Shipping points.
We had been reported that User A updated Outbound deliver "12345678" which belongs to Indian plant. We checked and found that roles are already restricted at shipping point, plant and company code level. And at Org level he didn't have Indian plant at all. But still he "User A" were able to update deliver which belongs to Indian plant.
I understand that, Each delivery been assigned to respective plant and all data stored at LIKP table.
My question is, there is any way to have restriction around this and prevent user not to perfom such acivity in SAP system if they don't have plant number been assigned at org level.
Regards,
Kumar
Hi,
Today our PRs with contracts generated from MRP are automatically getting price from material master data and not from contract price. This happens with and without source list defined (with MRP relevant), even tho in the PR we have the contract as source of supply.
Is this how standard SAP works?
Is there any way to customize MRP to get the price from the contract and not material master data?
Thanks!
Dear Experts
We have an agreement with unplanned services kind of price list , with quantity 0,
when making changes in the gross price ( SBRTWR esll table)
there is not change history is maintained CDPOS table,
and could't see what the change was made item gross price
We want to keep the changes being made at the gross price's service.
Best Regards
Judith O
Stock for part no's is not getting reduced after passing movement type 161 - GR returns account assignment.
Could you pl clarify why it is not reducing the stock?
I mean to say is there any possibility to customize PO in such a way that some a/c assignment category in PO after entering a specific kind of material type in PO.
Hi Experts,
Please help me for a scenerio where a Service procurement is planned like Ploughing and for the same a material like Fuel Diesel is issued for this purpose.
Requirement : The value of diesel is required to be adjusted e.g Rs 100/Litre for the Area where ploughing is done. and the rate at which ploughing is to be done is fixed e.g, Rs 1000 for 100 Sq ft.
Example :
Area where Ploughing to be done : 200 Sq ft
Rate : Rs 100 per Sq ft
Fuel (Diesel) : 100/Litre
Fuel to be issued : 50 Litre
Valuation :
Service Procurement : 200 X 100 = 2000
Goods Issue = 50 X 100 = 500
Net Payable =2000 - 500 = Rs 1500
Pls suggest wayouts, already thoughtof scenerios is Subcontracting, Condition type and SALE/Purchase
Regards,
AKS
Subject was edited by: Jürgen L
When i am creating reservation via MB21(a custom movement that is copy of 101) sometimes it happens that reservation is not visible in Co09 but it is visible in MD04. Anyone had similar issues?
Hi,
I am facing issues with activating scheduled changes through transaction MM13.
In transaction MM12 I schedule changes for field length and breadth for UOM - EA, UPK & CV. Then I goto transaction MM13 and activate the scheduled changes. The values for length and breadth field are activated only for UOM EA and rest two UOMs retain the previous value.
Have anyone of you ever faced such a situation and if yes, what was the solution that you have applied for this issue.
Please help me out.
Regards,
Anuj Srivastava
Hello,
The issue I am presenting here exist for both Plant Maintenance & Material management but I have chosen to start discussion in MM because of the complexity of the problem.
The problem is wrong material valuation type picked during PR creation from maintenance order.
The process is external refurbishment. In this process we are using batch managed split valuation of the material. Following are the steps I have followed:
1. Material is split valuated as New, Refurb & Damaged
2. I have mentioned valuation type Refurb for the valuation of returning material in maintenance order
3. I have selected the check box for subcontracting for external operation of PM order
4. Rework material S is maintained for the material in PM order
5. Automatic PR ( Subcon PR of Acct. Assgnt cat F & L) is generated when PM order is released and saved
Now the problem arises here is that that in PR the valuation type of material is picked up as "New" instead of "Refurb". Prior to this scenario testing has been done for Non batch managed material in those cases material valuation type is picked up as Refurb that was fine and correct.
Does anybody suggest or guide what could lead to change of material valuation type in case of batch managed material or any configuration we missed out.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Hi All,
I have a issue where SLED is different between the WM , i.e in table LQUA and batch record. The flow of sequence is ,a new batch was created with movement type 309, in which a new SLED was calculated based on the Manufacturing date/GR date and the shelf life days in material master. so far so good . SLED in both batch record and LQUA was in sync.
However subsequenty it was decided by business to change the expiry date to past date i.e to make the batch expired. This change reflected in the batch record (MSC3N) However was not transferred to WM. That means in LS02/LS24 /LQUA table ,I still see the old SLED date.
I need to understand the root cause of this so as to prevent this from happening in future.I wanted to see if any of you have faced a similar issue.
All the config is in place and this issue is not observed all the time and I am not able to recreate this issue in Dev/Quality.
Any inputs would be helpful.
Regards,
Shankar
Dear All,
My company wants to capture/Pay for Electricity every month using SAP MM. What is the best process for this? Can somebody guide me ?
If process is no process in MM, then finance will pay directly with invoice???? please advise me.
Regards,
Dear Gurus,
I have configure the vendor sub range in the vendor A0001, Subrange Code is Z001 (Multiple Goods Supplier) and than choose partner function only and enter the 61,62,63 and 64 vendor as a Goods supplier vendors and save the vendor master.
Assign the sub range code Z001 at the PO level, but when I do the GRN system dont give me any pop up window to choose the correct Goods Supplier, and nothing display at the MIGO tab page of "Partner".
What mistake I have done please confirm, I want sutem give me the popup and selected sub vendor should appear in the partner tab page.
Looking for the gurus feedback.
regards,
imran khan