Hi all,
I noticed that some condition types don't show on Purshasing order ( CU00, CUFR, CUPZ, CUDL and all Condition types relation to customs).
Even when I maintain these condition types in MEK1, I still can't find them in PO.
What can be the problem? Am I missing something?
P.S: I am using RMIMPO as pricing procedure.
Thank you.
Hello Everyone,
We have ZNEU output type for contract. This is to send email to vendor.
All the configurations are done for this output type.
If I manually add this output type to contract the email is getting send but we need to default this output type when user creates the contract or change it.
I have searched related forums for this and followed all the configuration settings and seems like all the configuration is maintained but the output type is not getting defaulted for contracts. Below are some screenshots from NACE transactions. Can anyone one please help me to default this output type for contract ?
Thanks,
Khushbu.
Hi All,
I have a specific requirement wherein while doing GR against Purchase order the delivery note field should become mandatory and it should be based on some conditions like for eg. plant, movement type etc. for this I am planning to maintain these entries in Z table and if the condition is met like If GR against P.O is done for that plant then the field delivery note should become mandatory, if not satisfied it should not be an mandatory.
In order to achieve this I think I can make use of the BADI-MB_MIGO_BADI and this badi will get triggered only the condition maintained in the z table is met.
But my question here is since the MIGO transaction has many functionalities and many movement types like 101, 102 etc.,
I need to know which parameters I can maintain in z table other than mentioned above to make this delivery note field mandatory to be used as optimum for my requirement. I need this field to mandatory only for movement types 101, 102 and for few plants and not for all plants.
Also there could be the case that same plant will have scenario of delivery note mandate and non mandate case. In such scenario what parameters in Z table could exactly trigger the BADI. I hope plant and movement type will not be sufficient.
Kindly throw some light.
Regards,
MBN.
Dear Experts,
While updating the new Agent ID 6030862 in the existing group and code, system is throwing a message role assignment US 6011663 inconsistent.
Can you please help me to resolve this issue.
Please find the screen shot for your reference.
Thanks,
Rajushan
,
Hi All,
We have a scenario where UOM is getting changed in Outbound Delivery after PGI. The scenario goes like this.
Mat#A created with Base UOM as "KG," Ord. Unit (Purchasing View in Mat. Master) as "CSE" and Sales Unit (Sales View in Mat. Master) as "CSE" with 1CSE = 3KG maintained as conversion factor.
We create STO with 1CSE and later create a Outbound Delivery (OBD) using VL10G/VL10B. OBD gets created for 1CSE.
Outbound Delivery flows to EWM system and we will do Pick, Pack and PGI in EWM system.
PGI flows to ECC system and now UOM in OBD gets changed to 3KG and it will not be 1CSE.
Our query is that, why does UOM in OBD getting changed from CSE to KG after PGI. Is this standard behaviour of system?
Please check and advise.
Thank You,
Pavan
Dear Expert,
I created PO for Service Qty.=10 and Price 100
I Created SES for Service Qty.=5 and Price 100
I done MIRO for Service Qty. =3 and Price 100
Now i want to change the SES Qty. to 3, as i want to raise the balance Qty. to another Vendor
While revoking the SES approval i am getting following Error-
GR Based IV and SR Based IV is ticked
If i had done MIRO for partial amount system should allow me to change by MIRO Qty.
I checked many thread but not getting similar situation
Regards
Kamal Kant
Dear Experts,
We have a requirement that, when ever scheduling agreement /PO pricing conditions are changed , all the changed conditions should be reflected in the info record or when ever an Scheduling agreement /PO is changed a new info record along with conditions should be created. Is this possible ? I kindly request to provide me suggestions .
Thanks in Advance
Mridula
Dear Experts,
can any one explain how to delete one material component in subcontracting purchase order. because i created one Po for sub contract operation and did the GRN for some quantity. after few days MOB is changed but i don't want to delete existing PO and create new PO with relevant BOM changes.
is there any possibility to delete that material component from existing PO.
any T code to do it?
please explain step by step.
Tks.
Hi Knowledge ,
While doing PO , user as not checked the GR Bsd IV indicator under item details ,
GR as done for this PO .
GR Bsd Iv is non-editable now /after GR .
How to check this indicator in PO, without reversing the GR - Cancelling PO - Table level.
How to clear this kind of document in sap
Thanks
Murali.V
Hi all
One Third Party PR -4********** of Quantity-65.000,000 was created against Sales Order-4******.User Created one Partial PO-6******01 of quantity-18.000,000.
User facing below error at the time of creation second PO for partial quantity against same PR.
Message No.06 249 Material for Preq & , Item &, already partially ordered.
As per standard SAP functionality we can not create more than one Partial PO against PR created from sales order.
But after removing fixed vendor, and info record from PR system allowing to create more than one Partial PO from same PR. User asking why system behaved like that???
why system allowing to create more than one PO from single PR in Third Party process.???
Thanks & Regards,
Bubai
Hi All,
For some quotations in me47 wrong pricing procedure is being picked...
Couldnt trace the reason...I have checked vendor master but schema group is correct...how to make changes to the existing quotations to pick the correct pricing procedure...
Material document is not getting updated with all line items if you posted GR with multiple line items and we are getting error "Entry & & & not in table & (system error)" message number:M7000
ME3M gives a list but not in a table format. Is there any other transaction for the same?
Dear SCN's,
I have scenario like we issue battery to a equipment and when there is any other equipment where battery is required then we do canabalization that is we remove battery from one equipment and transfer it to another equipment. We remove battery through reservation 262 mvt type (Breakdown order) and valuation type as old battery then transfer it to new equipmemt with 261 mvt type(Breakdown order). Now my issue is whenever i remove the old battery from an equipment i need to gove a value for it and transfer the battery to another equipment with that value. How to map this process please give suggestions
Dear,
I am experiencing difficulties once I try to perform MEI1.
I have set up the following pre-requisites:
1. I have activated the Direct Entry for Creation of the Worklist. In order to this I had to run report RMEBEMIG as explained in the Help text of the related IMG node.
2. I DID NOT activate the change pointer for message type CONDBI as this was recommended in the same help text.
3. I maintained the Control Purchasing Document Adjustment by adding the relevant Price Condition (In this case PB00)
4. I maintained the 'Document Index Active' indicator for the relevant Vendor
5. I maintained the pricing date category 3 'Current Date' in the Purchasing Info Record.
On 22-03-2015 I created a purchase order with 2 items for the same material. At time of creation the purchase price was 11,00.
Requested Delivery Date:
Item 10: 29-03-2016
Item 20: 29-04-2016
The same moment I created 2 price conditions:
1. Starting from 01-03-2016 till 31-03-2016 for a price of 10,00
2. Starting from 01-04-2016 till 30-04-2016 for a price of 9,99
On 25-03-2016 I ran transaction MEI1 and my purchase order for the two items appeared in the worklist. When I processed them the price in the PO got updated and the pricing data in the condition control tab on PO item level was set to 25-03.
On the 1st of April I ran MEI1 again expecting that the price condition with a starting date of 01-04 would show up in my worklist. It didn't.
Even when I changed the price condition and re-ran MEI1 it did not show up in my worklist.
Only when I changed the price condition for 01-03 till 31-03 it appeared in my worklist. So apparently MEI1 checks the price data as available on PO item to check the corresponding price condition which falls within the same period. Only when this price condition has changed, it will appear in the worklist.
I checked the other threads on this forum but they did not describe this particular issue.
Does anyone have experience with this?
Thanks for your feedback.
Is there a way to "red" alert if a vendor change is being made to a specific part number.
Example: We have 3rd Party Certifications that are only valid with the supplier that was audited. We would like to have SAP warn us if a new vendor is being created or the current vendor is being marked for deletion or if fixed vendor is changed.
Alert could be as simple as a pop-up message saying - Warning - 3rd Party Certification Required On This Vendor/Part Combination
Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Dear Seniors,
We have a process in which we are purchasing raw materials which are coming batched from Vendor.
In house, we serialize them.
We want to be able to specify the Vendor Batch and Serial Number in the Goods Receipt (MIGO).
The challenge we are facing is that if we mark the material batch and serialized in the material master, then the Batch field is mandatory in the Goods Receipt. We want to be able to mention only the Vendor Batch
Please let me know your suggestions about how you would solve this challenge.
Thank you,
Alex
Hi
I am trying to mass update Purchase Group ( MARC-EKGRP) in material master throuhg MM17. It is giving below error. But I am able to change the same material through MM02.
The material type is NLAG with views for Basic Data 1, Basic Data 2, Purchasing, Purchase Order Text, Accounting 1 and Accounting 2. MRP view is created as these not stock materials.
Message no. M3327
It is not possible to access the user department required because not all of the maintenance statuses have been entered for the plant in Customizing, and/or for the material type. For example, if the maintenance status D (material requirements planning) is missing for a plant, all MRP screens are deactivated for this plant.
Check the setting for the field Maintenance status in Customizing for the Material Master in Define reference for plant-specific field + screen selection. You can display the meaning of the maintenance statuses by displaying the possible entries.
Please provide a solution
Mohammed Iqabl
Hi Gurus,
We are trying to activate the batch activation for non batch managed material.The log shows that the inbound deliveries for PO are open although they are done with the GR.The PO qty, IBD qty and GR Qty are same.Can any one tell me why the deliveries are showing as open in MM02 batch activation display error screen,even after the IBD is completely recieved.
Regards
Govind
Hi Gurus,
I have 500+ PO for which now I have to do MIGO.
I have searched a lot but I have not found step by step procedure document of creating LSMW for this activity.
Can you please suggest me some document or steps how I will create LSMW for MIGO.
Thank you so much.
Best Regards,
Mayank Tyagi