Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live

ML81N and SHD0

$
0
0

Hi Gurus,

 

I'm working on ML81N, and I have already done a variant by SHD0 that disable a button (the green button for back).

 

My question is:

 

Is it possible to discriminate by SHD0 this: i want to disable the green button in ML81N only when im in modify or create mode, and not when im in display mode...


Is it possible?

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Hi

Domenico


PO item value changes back to original at the time of Release

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

I'm using a BADI (IF_EX_ME_PURCHDOC_POSTED ) to reset release strategy at changes in PO item description, value and quantity. If an approved PO is changed, the release is reset through an FM.

 

The problem is, This system is working fine for all fields except net value.

 

When a PO which has been changed and its strategy reset, is released again, the price returns to original value again ! (for example if the original price was $10 at the time of release, when changed to $12, the release strategy is reset and the value shown on PO is $12. However when it is released again, the price reverts to $10 !!! ).

 

This however does not happen if description or quality is changed. They maintain their new values at the time of re-release.

 

I Have checked Price tolerances in configuration (PE), and release indicators (1-6), but it doesn't solve the issue. Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks.

Reusing Purchase Requisition Numbers

$
0
0

Hi everyone,

This is my first post here and it looks a bit complicated so apologies if any of it is not clear;

 

I have some questions about how purchase requisitions are considered by MRP when reusing PREQ numbers;

 

The business have recently moved to reusing/recycling the PREQ numbers. This has been going okay but a user noticed some strange behaviour recently and is looking for an explanation.

 

EXAMPLE:

2 PREQ numbers exist from the last MRP run.

PREQ 01 is suggested to be delivered first, based on release date and delivery date in PREQ.

PREQ02 is at a point in the future after PREQ01

 

Same 2 PREQ numbers still exist after MRP run.

PREQ 01 is now changed after MRP. The release date and delivery date are now far into the future.

PREQ02 has not been changed by MRP so the original dates are as before.

 

However, because the PREQ01 has been changed, PREQ02 is now ahead of PREQ01 in the calendar but not on the stock requirements list (based on number range value I guess?)

 

So, questions;

 

1. Has the second MRP run changed the original contents of PREQ01 or deleted the contents entirely and assigned new information to the recycled PREQ number? I do realise that the MRP settings will influence this too so a general conceptual idea of how recycling works would be useful.

 

2. How is the stock requirements detail list sorted? By PREQ number (element reference number) and then date? Or date and then PREQ number? And can this be customised so we are always seeing the priority elements (e.g. earliest required PREQs) at the top of the list?

 

I'd appreciate any help I can get with this as I can't seem to find any answers in the places I looked so far.

 

L

BOM explode option in subcontracting PO

$
0
0

Company "XYZ" manufactures few materials whose material code are as follows:

  • CR11
  • PI11
  • CYL11
  • CS11
  • FW11

and assembles them into new assembly (whose code is ENG11)

ENG11 BOM has been created which requires each components of the above mentioned materials.

 

Company "XYZ" also procures WH11, TY11, CH11, ACC11 & GL11 from vendor 100240.

 

Company "XYZ" gives subcontracting PO to vendor 100250 for material (matr code: CRSUV)

In the SC PO, CRSUV BOM will be exploded which consists of following materials: WH11, TY11, CH11, ACC11, GL11 & ENG11.

 

Requirement:

if ENG11 assembly is not there in inventory, In CRSUV BOM, instead of ENG11 these components CR11, PI11, CYL11, CS11, FW11 along with WH11, TY11, CH11, ACC11, GL11 must get exploded?

 

please suggest.... awaiting your valuable suggestions and help in this regard.

thank you.

best way for GR of material as non valuated and non stock

$
0
0

our scenario:

in some cases, we receive material that is actually only "in transit" in our storage location as it continues to the customer almost immediately.

We therefore need to receive the material without value and without it being considered in the stock count.

What is the best way to do such a thing?

the material type can vary, so we cannot use a specific non valuated material type.

Also, the same material can in different scenarios arrive via regular channels (delivery, PO etc) and be valuated as well as being counted for the stock.

Anyone has experience and knowledge of this?

Demand and Requirements date!

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We are getting customer demands in weeks and Months.

For 'month' demands it appears as 03.2016, 04.2015 etc...But when there is a holiday on the 1st (e.g. 1st April), it moves the demand to previous working day ( which is basically previous month-March ). it means there is no demand for that month ( April ) but higher demand for march.

It is there any setting which allow me to fix it, I have seen the customer demand idoc and it has 1st April.

For these parts there is NO value in MRP2-planning calendar.

 

Best Regards,

G

MMBE On Order Qty Not matching with Open STO's/PO's Qty

$
0
0

Hi,

 

STO created in the plant and the outbound Delivery created . After that the delivery qty marked as zero.

 

If we check it in ME2L still showing as open order but in MMBE on order field not updated.

 

Whether this open order qty should show in MMBE or not?

Currency type tab missing in MR21 price change

$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

I've created a new plant and we are trying to make price change via MR21. We noticed that group currency tab and hard currency tab is missing. We have an existing plant under the same company code which has those tabs when we use MR21 price change.

 

Is there a missing setup for us to activate the currency types: group and hard currency during MR21 price change?


subcontracting

$
0
0

Hello All,

 

We have problem about subcontractig processes. Below you can find the details;

u2022         We created purchase order with item category F.

u2022         We sent the breakdown part ( material have serial number ) with using movement type 541 into the vendor.

u2022         Whenever we tried to receive the material with using movement type 101 and 543 the system get the error message which is IO229 below you can find the message explanation.

 

Message no. IO229

Diagnosis

You have entered an incorrect batch or movement type.

The batch entered in the document or movement type does not correspond to the batch or movement type saved in the master record of the serial number.

System Response

The system cannot perform the function.

Procedure

Use another serial number or batch.

 

Below you can find the our system configuration.

 

......................Soft. Com.......Release........Level..............Highest sup...........................Desc.

 

......................SAP_APPL....604................     7           

active.............IS-UT.............     604................7....................SAPK-60407INISUT...............SAP Utilities/Telecommunication

......................EA-APPL.......604................     7....................     SAPK-60407INEAAPPL.........SAP Utilities/Telecommunication

......................EA-APPL.......604................     7....................     SAPK-60407INEAAPPL.........SAP Utilities/Telecommunication

......................EA-APPL.......604................     7....................     SAPK-60407INEAAPPL.........SAP Utilities/Telecommunication

......................EA-APPL.......604................     7....................     SAPK-60407INEAAPPL.........SAP Utilities/Telecommunication

......................EA-APPL.......604................     7....................     SAPK-60407INEAAPPL.........SAP Utilities/Telecommunication

......................EA-APPL.......604................     7....................     SAPK-60407INEAAPPL.........SAP Enterprise Extension PLM, SCM

Not active......     ECC-DIMP......     600................     17..................SAPK-60017INECCDIMP........DIMP

 

Could you please inform us about the solution if you know?

 

Regards,

 

Edited by: htccvs on Nov 3, 2010 11:15 AM

Account Types in WL Document Type

$
0
0

Hi,

I have configured a FOC order process.  The client wants to give free of charge material to customer with assigning cost center in sales order. The process is very similar to the one mentioned in the following thread.

 

http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-58186

 

 

In my case, the client will have the option to have the goods delivered from the plant with same company code or another company
code.  In latter scenario, The FOC order will be created in one company code with the supplier plant in another company code.

 

 

I was able to process the FOC order without any issue in case of first scenario (Plant belongs to same company code).

 

 

When I tried to perform the goods issue in second scenario (plant belongs to different company code), I got following error.

 

 

Account type D is not defined for document type WL

 

Account type K is not defined for document type WL

 

To resolve the error, I had selected both Customer and Vendor in Account types allowed in OBA7.
The other account types were already selected.

WL.jpg

After selecting the account types for customer and vendor, I was able to post the goods  issue.

I got following account postings.

 

Account Document xxxx Company Code 1000(supplier plant)

Finish goods        Cr

Internal Customer(2000) Dr

 

 

Account Document xxxx Company Code 2000(internal customer)

Cost element(Cost Center XXXX)    Dr

Supplier(supplier plant)1000      Cr

 

I want to know if above posting are as expected/ok?  Also, I understand that WL is for goods issues with reference to deliveries.

I had to select the customer and vendor account types in WL.  I don’t imagine that it will impact our current delivery postings as I am not removing
any account types, Is that correct?

 

I would appreciate if you can answer the above queries.

 

 

Regards,

 

Abdul

 

Error - Account type D is not defined for docum... | SCN

WBS Element not copied to Outbound Delivery from STO

$
0
0

Hi,

 

When i create Outbound delivery against a STO with account assignment category P & K, WBS element in the STO (from Account Assignment tab) is not getting copied to outbound delivery, whereas when i create STO with account assignment category Q, WBS element is copied to OBD.

 

I did some analaysis on this and found that if there is value in the field "Special stock ind (EKPO - UMSOK)" then WBS element is getting copied to delivery.but i am not very sure on this..

 

Now my question is..

 

1. Is there any configuration available to copy the WBS element from STO to Outbound delivery. I wanted to have WBS element updatd in delivery even with account assignment categoy P and K.

 

 

Regards,

Prabu

Stop EDI Inbound Deliveries

$
0
0

We would like to receive ASNs from our vendors.  I have the appropriate EDI settings configured and am receiving the ASNs fine.  My problem is that I don't really need the inbound deliveries that are being created.  Is there a standard way to suppress the inbound delivery.  I've tried the following settings and both work fine, but the both also create inbound deliveries.

 

Message TypeBasic TypeProcess ControlTypeProcess CodeIndound Function
DESADVDELVRY03DELVLALEDELSIDOC_INPUT_DESADV1
DESADVDESADV01SD05LALEDESAIDOC_INPUT_DESADV

 

 

I know I can problem copy the standard inbound functions to prevent the inbound delivery, but I was hoping for a more standard solution.

 

Thanks

Tom

Invoicing Plan with GR/IR

$
0
0

Dear Gurus,

I have a requirement like this: The user asks for creating PO wtih partial invoicing plan and the would like to have valuated GR transaction (MIGO) for admitting the cost (User would like to have accounting document for this GR transaction). Then do Invoice Receipt (MIRO) based on the invoicing plan.

 

The problem here: PO with invoicing plan only could be done for non-valuated GR transaction. Do you have any suggestion regarding this? And how to fulfill my user's requirement ?

 

Thanks all.

 

Best regards,

Viktor Wijaya

Why SAP force GR non valuated for invoicing plan?

$
0
0

Hi Xperts,

 

Need some clarification of why SAP will force for GR non valuated when invoicing plan is chosen. Is there any BADI or user exit to make GR valuated for invoicing plan?

 

Thanks.

Advance Returns Management

$
0
0

We have activated Advance Returns Management for NB doc type. We have done the other required configuration

- Assign delivery type RL to doc type/plant

- create shipping data for plant

- activated the sales view in the material for providing loading group / transportation

- Checked Return vendor flag in vendor master and assigned the customer number

 

Now when we create the Return PO (by selecting Return check box on line item) I get message "Shipping data for plant required for Advanced Returns PO".

 

We have tried to look at every piece of configuration that might be causing this error but no luck. Would like to seek help within the SCN community if anybody has experience dealing with this issue.

 

Thank you


Organisation Structure & Integration

$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

                  I am putting basic questions as I am from some other module . Learning MM now , Kindly help

 

1. How to Assign storage location to plant ?

 

2. How to deal with various Purchasing organization level like (Centralized , Company specific & plant specific) w.r.t assignments ?

 

3. How to assign purchasing group to purchasing organization ?

 

4.Integration of MM with other modules like FICO ,PM,PP,SD & QM ?

 

Regards

Keerthan Kumar

ME59N history table

$
0
0

Hi experts.

 

I would like to know if there is a table for the history of running ME59N.

Plus, I want to see the logs or messages like I can get after running ME59N, if such kind of transactions or table exist.

 

Any help is welcome.

Best regards.

 

Takeshi

Issue in tool admin ICC (T-Code: /OPT/VIM_7AX8)

$
0
0

I am trying run a report Tool Admin ICC T-code /OPT/VIM_7AX8 but I see that the status of documents PD not are automatically updated. Could you please help with this problem?

Related to SAP MM STO Process Delivery through VL10B

$
0
0


Hi All,

 

I have one STO NB Type Intercompany.  I found one different case where for one line item in background system have created four delivery for the same quantity.

 

Example -

 

PO  line item have 39000 qty and according to the process it will create one delivery for the all quantity. But system have created four delveries for same quantity.

 

I really do not know  how this is happened and even  GI is also done 4 times for the same quantity.

 

please help

4101416886 000001 Material RXL9610601 has status: Invalid-this country (delivery is not allowed)

$
0
0


Hi ,

 

we are getting error message while creating the delivery "4101416886 000001 Material RXL9610601 has status: Invalid-this country (delivery is not allowed)."

 

please suggest me any solution.

 

Regards,

Sanjay singh

Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>