Hi Team,
We have a scenario where we have materials procured to Plant B from Plant A through a STO. We have the source list and other master data maintained. There are instances where this material can be procured to Plant B directly from the vendor. How can we control this from a master data setting so that we can control it after MRP run. Do we have to create the PO manually. Let me know the options
Regards
Nevin
Hi All,
When creating new info records, how can we default the valid to date to 18 months in the future from the creation date instead of the current 12/31/9999 date.
Hello everyone,
I have searched on all the forum and I have still not found the solution. It is quite strange. I know this error appears when OBYC is empty because of variation value but there are no variation in the price. It happens when trying to do a post good issue in VL02N.
I have one material 'M' and I transfer it (movement 641) from plant P1 to P2. They are in the same company code. The price control of this material is standard price and it has the same price on the two plants.
Last week, it blocked for first time and I forced the update of the price with a MR21 (-1 then +1 to the price) and it worked. And today it is appearing again but the update doesn't work anymore. Between the two operations, there was only a movement code 501 on P1 last friday.
I think that the manual update procedure doesn't work because of the monthly closing as we are now in June but do you have an idea why the system is trying to post a variation value ?
Last indication, on P2 there is no stock right now the total value of the stock is 0 in "accounting 1" view but the standard price is still the same as the one in P1.
And just to precise, the problem only appears in production system, so I cannot test elsewhere....
Thank you a lot for all your ideas
Ben D.
For a material (material type ROH) where we typically receive some free goods with our order, we wish to receive it into unrestricted inventory in a separate storage bin but do not want the free goods to impact the average price (on the material master) of this part. I have already run multiple searches online and on SCN to no avail. My ideal solution is only have one material master to order and be able to receive free goods from the vendor periodically which will not affect its moving average price (MAP).
Using tcode MIGO with movement 511 will still impact MAP so this is not the solution and using the PO "free" flag also has the same end result to decreasing the MAP.
I could create a new material type (and corresponding material master) but this will require the business to manage two masters for the same part. Inventory management would balk at this solution where we might get a false request to order more when inventory exist in another material master. I would like to know what best practice or standard SAP solutions exist for this scenario.
Hello team,
I have seen in some STOs division maintained in supplying plant configuration is 00 ( Define shipping data for plants)
where as in STO it defaults 60 division .
We have not changed any configuration & no any user exist applied.
Is there any source ( without configuration) to default this value in PO( shipping tab)
Please give your valuable feedback.
Prashant
Dear Gurus,
The requirement is at the time of Goods receipt of raw materials against PO document, we need to be able to select the qty & batch (automatically generated) with classification data(manually entering the value inside classification)
Line item 10
Material - XYZ
Qty- 100 PCS (Pieces)
here user must be able to select (say in a pop-up screen like "Distribution Qty" option)
100PCS- Different Batch must get generated from for eg., 0000001 to 0000100 (in total 50 different batch numbers) to after entering the classification data ( like length 100meter)
Pls help to solve this requirement even through any development if not possible in standard SAP.
P.S: Sorry as I've given the requirement wrongly before..
Thanks in advance.
Reg,
Jagan.
Hi,
I have one business scenario where business is doing the subcontracting from Plant A. Sub-contract purchase order is being raised from plant A.
If components are not available in Plant A, they are doing the stock transfer from Plant B to deliver directly to Sub-contract vendor in Plant A.
At present they are doing the goods receipt wrt outbound delivery in plant A and further doing the transfer posting to Sub-contractor using MIGO; MVT type 541.
Now business want to post the Goods receipt wrt outbound delivery directly to Vendor stock. Basically they want to avoid additional step of transfer posting (541).
I explored the options and activated the business function LOG_MM_OM_1 (Outsourced manufacturing) and implemented the sap note - 1926655 to enable the SC vendor check box in delivery address tab of STO.
Created the Stock transfer order using ME21N and entered the Sub-contract vendor in delivery address tab and selected the SC vendor Check box. Created the outbound delivery using VL10B and done the PGI (VL02N). It picked the mvt type 641 based of delivery schedule line item category.
Now while posting the Goods receipt with reference to Outbound delivery, I am getting below error -
St.w.Vend.Transfer exceeded by 1 EA : MATXXXX PLTXX O
Message no. M7022
Please let me know, whether any additional configuration is required for this? how to overcome this error.
Thanks, Ranjan
Vendor name is required while creating Purchase Orders so that Users are aware at the time of Purchase Order which vendor is selected. Vendor is specified in Condition type and I need to know:
How to meet this requirement and the effort required.
Hi Gurus,
We have activated the business function LOG_MMFI_P2P. The function works ok, but when we enter the downpayment amount at header level, it won't split when we are trying to create the downpayment in ME2DP t.code. We have to manually calculate the DP amounts for the line items & enter. Though in some PO's we have more than 50 line items, it's a big headache. please help us to get through this. And also I want to know that, if we create a DP at header level, is there any possibility to have the DP as 1 line item in FBL1N....?
Thanx.
Kasun.
Hi,
As per business requirement We need to combine Both Domestic and Import pricing proceduere.
please suggest how it is possible in SAP.
Regards,
Bhanu
I have a scenario with a ALES sales position sales order. For the ALES position type, this is a third party order where the purchase order is automatically created after saving the sales order.
I have customized a sales order text to be copied from the sales order to the purchase requisition and then to the purchase order.
When the PO is created, and then change the text in the sales order, I get a pop up: Text is changed, do you want to overwrite the text in the purchase requisition? When confirmed, this is exactly what is done.
But: I do not only want the text in the purchase requisition to change, but also in the PO. I cannot get SAP to do this.
What am I doing wrong? Why should SAP change the text in the PurReq when this is allready converted to a PO? This doesn't make sense.
I want to do mass changes of planned delivery time in PR ofr PR which are not converted to PO's.
I checked transaction memassrq but it seems mass changes are not possible I do not see planned delivery time field there.
Dear Experts,
Could any one please explain what is the difference ECC 6.0 v/s ECC 6.0 EHP 7.
because our company plan for to EHP 7.
Regards,
Rajesh
What can be the possible process we adopted to implement the online purchasing through e commerce websites using the credit card integrated with P2P cycle in this process. what is the accounting configuration required to achive this process.
Please Help...
Hi,
We have created service PO and then created Service entry sheet against that PO.
Then we deleted that service entry sheet but Value got Updated in PO history after deletion of Service Entry Sheet.
Is there any SAP note available to fix this bug?
Thanks and Regards,
Pankaj
Hello,
i get a return delivery from a customer. Now i want to do a Transfer posting with the MIGO movement type 453. But i always get the Message: "Order XXX requires assignment to an Operation number"! What is wrong with this?
Thanks for every help!
Hello Experts,
Can you please tell me how the email gets triggered on releasing the PO from ME28.
Is there any USER-EXIT or form that triggers the email.
Please respond.
Regards,
Shirsha
Hi all,
I have a very weird behaivour. I have activated MRP for a plant and in a material i have define V1 as MRP run and HB as lot size (replenish to maximum stock). I upload stock with 561 movement type and then i run MRP. However, the MD03 does not show the available stock (it shows zero - 0 ) and it creates a PR for the total quantity it needs to go from zero stock to the maximum stock.
In addition, if i double click at MD04 result at the 1st line where the stock is zero, it shows as untrestricted quantity 4, which is the quantity i have in stock!!!
any ideas?
BR
Hi Expert,
A thetime of archiving PO data i got an error. I wnat to know that as per my understanding this error is coming because of open PO or Requisite are not met.
1) Final delivery indicator set Delivered = Invoiced
2) Final delivery indicator set No IR planned
3) Delivered >= Ordered Delivered = Invoiced
4) No history for purchasing document item
There are 24000 PO out of which 315 PO of year 2010 has been able to archive. I wonder how to anser the client.
Help is appreciated.
Hi,
We are getting the error message ME 760 'No Doc items belonging to purchasing documents found' when trying to release the EDI output for a PO change in transaction ME9F.
From analysis and review of SCN and SAP Notes, we find the system is not finding the change documents (or the change pointers are consumed by another simultaneous output).
Setup:
Upon changes to PO, two outputs simultaneously get generated, but processed differently:
Output-1 EDI Processed manually at a later time by user in ME9F
Output-2 ALE Processed immediately upon release/saving the document.
We think the ALE output that is immediately processed, is causing the EDI output to fail when processed later in ME9F. However, business does not want to change the processing modes for either outputs.
I am in the process of raising an SAP Note, but don't have much hope of changing standard behavior (assuming the it is a standard behavior).
Is there any suggestion on User Exit or custom code to make ME9F successful for the EDI output processed later?
thanks,
YR