Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Accounting Entries - PGI

May 21, 2015, 10:37 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I would like to understand the impact on the accounting entries on posting goods issue on a subsequent delivery free of charge replacement order. Will it be any different from normal PGI accounting entries?

 

I want to use SD order type and when the delivery is PGId the stock should be reduced by the delivery quantity - I know there will not be any billing document but I would like to know the effect of PGI - I expect there will be a material document and an accounting document since the inventory is reduced.

 

Please share your input.

 

Thanks

 

Meghna

↧
Search

Contract - price updates for service lines

May 21, 2015, 12:03 pm
$
0
0


Hi Experts,

 

We have a contract with service lines in the production system for which price was updated by updating the pricing conditions with the new validity period (via BDC on ME32K).

The pricing conditions show the updated price and price unit.

However, the contract service line does not show the correct price unit.

The previous value was per 1 and the new value should be per 10.

I checked OSS notes and found the note "1922305 - Report RM06ENP0 - can it be used for service agreement?" - which mentions to go to service specifications and go to Prices-> Find new.

I tried this but the price unit does not get updated in the contract.

 

Is there any other method to update the correct price unit in the service line?

 

 

Thanks.

 

Regards,

Anusha

↧
↧

Vistex Tracking Issue for Reverse GRN Movement

May 21, 2015, 6:28 am
$
0
0


Dear Folks

 

We are using Vistex Pricing Procedure for our Retail business process.

For Target-based rebate requirement, we have configured Target-based Vistex agreements (/N/IRM/IPPRASP) into the system.

Vistex documents get created after the GRN is made depending upon the rebate scales maintained in the agreement.

 

Under this category of agreement, we have defined a rule of Quantity-based incentive calculation wherein rebate gets calculated over the total quantity achieved for a particular period of time.

 

For such cases, we have encountered a case where reverse GRN against a Purchase Order has been made.

The amount is seen in negative (-ve) but not the quantity of the material against which the reversal has been made.

 

The tracking (/N/IRM/IPPRCIP) screen gives the total quantity as a sum of all the quantities( GRN and reverse GRN both, eg: GRN made for Qty=2 & reversal made for Qty=1, then total Qty=1 for which GRN has happened but Standard tracking gives total Quantity=3)

The standard report of Purchasing Rebates(/N/IRM/IPPR05) doesn't show the negative quantities. Instead, it shows in positive.

 

 

 

Please suggest.

 

Let me know for any more inputs required from my behalf.

↧

carry out new pricing in PO

May 22, 2015, 5:18 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

For condition type RA00 we have maintained condition record & routine in pricing procedure to fetch condition record.

 

But while creating purchase order we need to carryout new pricing then only condition record value ids being updated in the condition type RA00.

 

I want that this value should be fetched automatically without a need to carry out new pricing.

 

Thanks,

Kiran

↧

CL24N - value assignment not saved

May 28, 2015, 8:04 am
$
0
0

At a client, we have a Purchase Order release strategy with following characteristics:

Company code - Order type - Purchase group - Material group

 

Now we are facing the following issue:

 

we need to add some material group values to a certain release strategy.

The material group value has been added as a characteristic value (CT02) and is available for selection.

In CL24N we can select the values .

When saving,  however, not all selected values are being saved.

When entering the release strategy again, some tick boxes of the material groups we selected and saved before are not ticked anymore.

 

We have tried several things:

- select all -> some are saved, some are not

- select multiple values -> some are saved, some are not

 

WHY ?

↧
↧

How can I create a physical inventory document for non-receipt sales order stock

May 27, 2015, 7:15 pm
$
0
0

Hi, experts

I have a question in physical inventory document
.

Is it possible to create a physical inventory document for sales order stock, which material is not received yet?

 

I am now using BAPI_MATPHYSINV_CREATE_MULT in order to create a PI document.

Let's say there is no PI for a certain sales order stock, and I do not receive the material yet

(Goods Receipt for the sales order stock does not exist)

 

When I run the BAPI under the situation as above,

I took a message "Sales order stock XXXXXXXXXX(SO number)  XXXXXX(item number) does not exist "

 

So I wonder it is impossible to create  a PI for non-receipt SO stock.

Is there any solution to it ?

Any help is welcome

 

 

Best Regards

Takeshi

↧

MRP stock transfer purchase requisition

May 27, 2015, 8:53 pm
$
0
0

Hi All

 

I have arequirement as below.

 

Plant A receving plant

Plant B issusing Plant

Order qty is 100

 

When there is shortge of item XXX in Plant A after running the MRP system should create a STO PR to plant B.Once the PR is created through MRP in Plant A its converted to STO .

 

Now if Plant B doesnt have stock , Run MRP in plant B its creates a normal PR  which gets converted to PO and the stock is received from the vendor.

The PR created in Plant B is picking the qty as per the material master (MRP views) setting in Plant B.

 

I want to know what setting should be done so that MRP in plant B should consider the demand qty from Plant A i.e 100 nos.And PR created in plant B should have linkage wrt to PR Qty from plant A

 

Thanks in advance for your replies

 

Regards

Amar

↧

how to add authorization check when save PO in hold

May 28, 2015, 10:08 am
$
0
0

Standard system allow to save PO in hold with out entering organizations data like Company code, Purcsing org.

our client want to make Purchasing Organizations (EKORG) field as mandatory field and system shouldn't allow user to save PO in hold status If P.Org is blank.

 

Please suggest solution.

 

Thanks

↧
Search

Condition type in STO required for raw materials and specific plants

May 28, 2015, 6:58 am
$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

 

In STO transfer raw materials from one plant to another plant same company code ,

 

user needs to enter every time manually FRB1 condition,vendor and price for transport charges pay to transport vendor ,

 

in this process some times user forgot to enter condition and processing further steps, to avoid manual user mistakes ,

 

we are using standard pricing procedure and FRB1 condition is Manual in this, i want to give FRB1 condition as Required for only Raw materials and

 

specific plants ,please give me best possibility to get my requirement..

 

 

 

 

Regards,      

Lavakumar.

↧
↧

ME2M scheduled job default layout

December 13, 2013, 9:28 am
$
0
0

good afternoon,

there has been a number of discussions about the layout of a alv report while running a scheduled job in the background. it seems like it doesn't want to use a layout you have created while using transaction code ME2M.

 

goto se38 and enter in program rm06em00 and run it with any variant (as long as it is a ALV list). when it completes and you are in the report output (alv), change the layout to whatever you want to see and save it as a global default layout. this layout will not be seen by anyone when running the transaction code ME2M. now, create the background scheduled job (sm36) and use program rm06em00 and use the variant of your choice. the printout will be the same structure as the global default layout you created in se38. you can also setup a recipient in the scheduled job to email this report.

hope this helps out the masses.

thanks.

↧

ME9F: Deferred processing of two outputs from PO changes

May 28, 2015, 8:51 am
$
0
0

Hi,

We are getting the error message ME 760 'No Doc items belonging to purchasing documents found' when trying to release the EDI output for a PO change in transaction ME9F.

From analysis and review of SCN and SAP Notes, we find the system is not finding the change documents (or the change pointers are consumed by another simultaneous output).

 

Setup:

Upon changes to PO, two outputs simultaneously get generated, but processed differently:

Output-1  EDI  Processed manually at a later time by user in ME9F

Output-2  ALE Processed immediately upon release/saving the document.

 

We think the ALE output that is immediately processed, is causing the EDI output to fail when processed later in ME9F. However, business does not want to change the processing modes for either outputs.

 

I am in the process of raising an SAP Note, but don't have much hope of changing standard behavior (assuming the it is a standard behavior).

Is there any suggestion on User Exit or custom code to make ME9F successful for the EDI output processed later?

 

thanks,

YRError.jpg

↧

Planning Supply Chain in SAP

May 27, 2015, 11:20 pm
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

has anyone of you have any experience on modelling a supply chain in SAP (not in APO or any other tools).

I have 47 plants and a central storage location which i need to model their movements for. Plants only sell:

they can take stock (a) from the supplier directly, (b) from central warehouse and (c) from other plants through

internal transfers.

 

I have seen in SPRO that SAP has some functions of declaring if a plant is a distribution plant, a manufacturing plant etc,

but i am not sure if this is my case...

 

Any thoughts/comments are welcomed!!!

 

Best regards,

Nikos Giannopoulos

↧

3 Way Match

May 28, 2015, 3:29 pm
$
0
0


Hello All

 

We have a business requirement wherein there should be a 3 way match based on ASN number in addition to match based on price and quantity.

It is expected that every IR's ASN should be matched with GR's ASN which means matching at line item level and not aggregate.

 

If we use the functionality of GR based Invoice check , we acheive 3 way match at line item level based on ASN where ASN number is same in GR and IR but this doesnot allow IR to be done without GR as the idoc fails.This is not in line for foreign vendor invoice scenario.

 

On the other hand the way standard SAP is behaving without the GR based IV check is , it does 3 way match randomly and not always a one to one match based on ASN and allows invoices to be received in the system with no GR.

 

Any pointers on how both the requirements can be met would help us.

 

Regards

Debasmita

↧
↧

How to set tolerence limit for planned service entry sheet net value with respect to PO value

May 29, 2015, 1:51 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

In Planned Service sceanrio, Standard system able to check the quantity tolerance only, not checking tolerence limit for Planned Service value.

 

Our requirement is to update "Gross Price" manually in Planned Service entry sheet. we get this option by creating Service PO with “Price
Change Allowed“ check box in “Service” tab at item level.

 

But issue is no option to control tolerance limit of Service entry sheets value (ie, System allow to create service entry
sheet for a PO to any value)

 

please advice us how to control this.

↧

Base UOM and Consumption UOM

May 29, 2015, 12:38 am
$
0
0

Hi SAP Family ,

 

Can you please clarify my doubts

1) How consumption UOM functionality  works? In my system it is grayed out .How the field picks the UOM.

2) Base UOM and Consumption UOM are same ?

 

Regards

Avitej

↧
Search

Archiving of MM_EKKO

May 28, 2015, 10:04 pm
$
0
0


Hi Expert,

 

We have started archiving mm_ekko obbject . Situation which i am facing is that when i ran write job to archive one year of data i was able to archive majority of that data but for some purchase document i get this message" Retention period not yet reached"

 

Also when i check these document in ME23N i get a message displayed that "Document is archived" but i don't see any archive file created for these document which i can delete and store in the archive server.

 

Can some please provide the config information which i need to change for such document .Please provide some information on how i can archive such document.

 

Help is appreciated.

 

Regards,

Shweta R

↧

GI to WO at different price from material master.

May 29, 2015, 6:04 am
$
0
0

Has anyone ever put in a process where a goods issue from SLOC inventory to a maintenance work order (MIGO 261) comes in to the order at a different price than what is on the accounting tab of the material master?

 

For example if a material has a moving average price of $15, but when we issue it to an order we want to bring it in at the last purchase price (for example) of $20?

 

If so, how was it implemented and how were the price variances handled?

 

Thanks for any info or suggestions.

↧
↧

Purchase order, Account Assignment : field Distribution disabled

May 27, 2015, 5:34 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

i'm ABAP developer, but i have a question for you (the functional is not here).

 

In my purchase orders, tab Account Assignment, the field Distribution is disabled, i cant' enter data. Apparently we can set the behavior of this field, can you help me ?

 

The need is to make grasped this field.

 

Thanks for your help.

↧

Is it possible to send Item level PO Idoc error messages confirmation back to an e-procurement system from sap?

May 29, 2015, 11:22 am
$
0
0

Hello SCM /Interface Experts,

 

Scenario: Procurement of Indirect Materials (Cost center, Assets, Project /WBS, etc.,) through e-Procurement system and SAP is back end system.

 

System land scape:  SAP  <--> SAP PI <-->  E-Procurement system (which is an external e-Procurement system non-SAP)

 

We have interfaces as follows:

 

PO Creation /Change   :  This is Inbound interface to SAP through PO Std. IDOC's

PO Confirmation          :  This is Outbound interface to SAP through std. PO IDOC.(ORDERS02  - for successful PO's)

PO Error handling         :  This is Outbound interface to SAP through std. PO IDOC (ORDERS02 - for unsuccessful PO's /failed IDOCs)

 

Query:

In regarding the PO Error handling, Is it possible to trigger (or sending the PO item level text (error) messages back to external system?  if yes, please explain or kindly post the steps for this implementation.

 

Also, is there workflow involved for the error messages confirmation while sending back to external system...


E.g. In case if PO IDOC failed to reach to SAP from external system, below are the common item level error that appears to be and due to any messages these Idocs can fail to transmit into SAP. That we need to communicate back to external system, so that this can be corrected further to reprocess or retrigger the Idoc in front end (external system).

 

-  Enter tax code (tax code is missing)

-  Tax jurisdiction code is missing

-  Cost center is missing

-  WBS Element is missing

-  GL Account couldn't be effected

-  Profit center is missing,

- Asset,  etc.

 

Because, currently we are sending only header level Idoc text error messages back to external system as part of the confirmation of failed Idocs. (because this external system required confirmations against success and failure Idocs transmission to SAP). So when PO Error handling confirmation sends back to external system.

E.g.  it looks like below:

No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference

 

 

So can anyone have idea on the item level error messages confirmation sending back to external system

 

 

Share your thought please.

 

Thanks

Srinivas

 

 

 

 

 

↧

delete a PO after GR and create new PO from same PR

May 29, 2015, 10:13 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

in our Sap MM system we have a 101 movement with PO number incorrect (component's quantities are not correct and this has generated a wrong 543).

We should reverse the 101 movement and create a new 101 movement with a new PO number (as the previous one cannot be modified).

We receive the Purchase requisition from another system.

My questions is:

is it possible to "delete" the PO number and create new PO number from the same purchase requisition?

 

As workaround: is it possible to change in same way (by debug or something) the component's quantities so we will avoid to create a new PO ?

 

Thanks and regards

Andrea

↧
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>