Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Modify Account determination for Cost of Sales Posting

May 7, 2015, 1:43 am
$
0
0


Hi,

 

The account determination for a goods issue movement(643) needs to be modified FOR CERTAIN INSTANCES e.g. the flow of goods outside of a certain country from a certain country. So we want to retain current account determination for 643 and change only for particular scenarios.

The only way account determination can be influenced is by the account modification key against the movement type in transaction OMWN.

 

OMWN acc mod.PNG

Function module MR_ACCOUNT_ASSIGNMENT reads table T030, however it does not facilitate any modification of account determination(via account modification key) except for WRX and PRD (with limitations).

Would it be PRUDENT to insert dynamic enhancement points in this module or slightly before it is called so that we can change the account determined? If we implement within standard SAP design we would have to copy movement type 643 (as the account mod key is against the movement type). We are trying to avoid the ripple effect caused by creating a whole new movement type.

 

Thanks in advance..

↧
Search

LSMW -service po creation for multiple line items

May 13, 2015, 8:05 am
$
0
0

Dear Expert,

 

As per business  requirement , Business want a LSMW .If anyone already created this kind of LSMW .Kindly share the experience with me

 

Regards

Ajeesh.s

↧
↧

BAPI_CONTRACT_CHANGE to update PARTNER but not EKKO-EKORG

May 13, 2015, 8:36 am
$
0
0

Hello all.

 

I need to massively change partner function OA to a lot of purchasing contracts

 

A relevant info is that these contracts all have a reference purchasing organization (porg) that refers to a lot of other porgs and, therefore, these contracts have just 1 porg in EKKO (the reference porg) but a lot of porgs in EKPA (for the partner functions there is not only the reference porg but also all the others).

 

To make the change I am using BAPI_CONTRACT_CHANGE in which I am filling the following import parameters for structure\field = value:

                                                                                                                                                                       

* PURCHASINGDOCUMENT = «the contract number»

* HEADER \ NUMBER = «the contract number»

* HEADER \ PURCH_ORG = «each one of the several porgs in EKPA for the contract»

* HEADERX \ NUMBER = X

* HEADERX \ PURCH_ORG = X

* PARTNER \ PARTN_ROLE = OA

* PARTNER \ PARTNR = «the code of the OA»

* PARTNERX \ PARTN_ROLE = OA

* PARTNERX \ PARTNR = X

 

With this configuration the BAPI not only changes the OA partner (the EKPA data) as expected but also changes the porg of the contract (i.e the EKKO porg) which is not supposed to change because the contracts become useless!

 

So, I tried a 2nd configuration which only differs from the 1st in the fact that I changed the import parameter “HEADERX \ PURCH_ORG = X” to “HEADERX \ PURCH_ORG = «empty»”. My idea was to tell the BAPI to use the porg as key field but not to update it.

 

But, with this 2nd configuration the BAPI changes... nothing.

 

So I am stuck between the 1st configuration, that changes more than expected, and the 2nd configuration which changes nothing at all.

 

Does anyone have experience on how to use this BAPI and make it change only the EKPA (partners at porg level) data and not change the EKKO porg?

 

Thanks

↧

Restrict valid to date in Info Record at the time of creation

May 13, 2015, 8:44 am
$
0
0


Hi All,

 

When creating new info records, how can we default the valid to date to 18 months in the future from the creation date instead of the current 12/31/9999 date.

↧

LSMW Purchase Order History with New General Ledger

May 13, 2015, 8:51 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

we're using the Report RM06EEI1 to migration purchase order history. The program worked fine since the new general ledger () has been activated.

 

Now the system outputs the message GLT2201:

Balancing field " " in line item  not filled

 

The new GL segment splitting is based on the profit center.

 

Can anybody help?

 

Thanks in advance and best regards

  Reinhard

↧
↧

Message No.ME_RELCHK021

May 13, 2015, 9:05 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

I am learning materials management,while doing release strategy am getting an error release code01 of release group PH deleted how to correct this error.

 

Regards,

Shivashankar

↧

Line not reversed correctly after GR

May 13, 2015, 6:02 am
$
0
0

img pr 2.jpgWe have an issue with line 110 on the PO below. The original GR was reversed, back in 2012, but for some reason, some of the delivery costs on the line were not reversed, this has left an open balance on the line item of 10.17 which needs to be removed.

↧

determine automatically the unloading point in SA

May 14, 2015, 3:56 am
$
0
0

hello colleagues,

 

can someone advise how to set up unloading point on scheduling agreements automatically, I mean without manual inputs.

 

thanks.

Alaaeddine.

↧
Search

Price Change in SA / PO

May 14, 2015, 12:42 am
$
0
0


Hello All,

 

We are having business scenario where the Price change is happening in PO / SA, but the business requirement is that the price should be driven while GR / IV based on the invoice date. example

 

Current Price - 100 upto 31.03.15

New Price - 110 from 01.04.15

 

Now the requirement is that if we do MIGO on invoice date pertaining to on or before 31.03.15, the price should be considered as 100 and if, the invoice date is as or after 01.04.15 the rate should be 110.

 

Please suggest in both cases - SA as well as PO.

 

Regards,

 

Pranav

↧
↧

Release strategy for closed Purchase Requisitions

May 13, 2015, 10:29 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

Is there any possibility to stop releasing of PR's which have been marked for "close" in quantity tab in PR.

 

Thanks.

↧

Good Receipt date didnt lies between scheduling dates.

May 14, 2015, 4:14 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

While posting migo i got this error, ''Good Receipt date didnt lies between scheduling dates''. Kindly guide me to solve this..

↧

Service condition types not adopted in SES and MIRO

May 13, 2015, 9:53 pm
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

PO is raised for materials w.r.t RFQ. Buyer knows the freight charges and is entering in PO as condition type which PO allows. PO check is maintained in such a way that no of line items in PO must match the RFQ and PR. When freight or packing& forwarding charges are intimated by supplier, it can be amended in PO as condition type and it does not affect the line items. so GR and MIRO isnt affected.

When we raise PO for Services, similar condition type is added such as Engineer idle charges or maintenance charges which can be known only after the service is completed by Engineer. These additional charges can be amended in PO but issue comes only when doing SES or MIRO where these are not captured. Only when these are added as separate line items in PO , will the SES or MIRO is possible.

Kindly guide me how to solve this issue???

 

Regards

Dhinesh

↧

Standard SAP Report for PO Transmissions?

May 14, 2015, 6:38 am
$
0
0

Hey All,

 

I was wondering if there is any standard SAP Report which shows whether different types of PO Transmissions have been successful or not? I'm hoping for an actual report here and not using SOST as it's not the best for people to understand and action quickly what needs to be fixed. Ideally if we can search based on a PO number or by date but displays the PO number in the report.

 

Regards,

 

Rachael

↧
↧

Version management is not working for blanket PR

May 14, 2015, 4:56 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I have configured version management for PR and Reslease strategy as well.

 

When I completely release the PR and change expected value and overall value (more than old value) of PR then only new release strategy is retriggering but new version is not get acivated.

 

Pls suggest.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Neeta Rajput

↧

transaction for displaying transactions that an user is authourized to use

February 17, 2010, 12:24 am
$
0
0

hi

   my user wants a transaction with which he can see all the transactions that he is authorized to do.is there any such?

↧
Search

Material prices increased Automatically

May 14, 2015, 8:26 am
$
0
0

Sir, i have a bought out material amount rs. 20/-but now its shows moving average price rs. 8900/-i.e wrong I have so many materials that shows wrong value. Please suggest.

Regards,

Rss

↧

How to Pay Invoice before Goods Receipt on the Purchase Order

April 9, 2012, 5:03 am
$
0
0

When the order is picked up from the Vendor, and in transit to us the customer, we need to be able to post the invoice against the PO before the material is received on site.

We have implemented Material Ledger and need to find to a way to maintain that data and be able to pay our Vendor in advance of Goods Receipt.. (to take advantage of payment discounts)

↧
↧

ME2N backgoround job schedulling.

May 15, 2015, 4:08 am
$
0
0

ME2N backgoround job schedulling:

 

I've schedulled ME2N report for background job with variant created as per my requirement. However there is no field on selection parameters to select view or layout.

 

I want output with default 'Account assignment view'  and layout created as per my requirement.

 

Is there a way to defined default view for background job.

↧

Consumption of a material with split valuation

May 15, 2015, 6:18 am
$
0
0

Hi experts,

 

Imagine that I have a material with the split valuation with stock in both splits.

 

Is it possible to do a consumption of this material without specifying a specific split.

 

Ex. Material A with split C1 with 10 KG of stock and split C2 with 20 KG. If I do a consumption of material A with quantity 2 Kg, the final stock should be C1 - 9Kg and C2 - 19kg.

 

Thanks for help.

↧

How to define uom conversion on each PO?

May 14, 2015, 9:16 pm
$
0
0


Hello Gurus,

 

I have a question on how to define the conversion of UOM on each PO.

I set the order unit BDT and the SKU M3, variable OUn on purchasing view material master = 1.

 

I need to set on the PO for today 10 BDT = 12 M3 but another PO for tomorrow 10 BDT =13 M3

This is depend to the drymeter even for the same vendor.

 

Is the only way by changing the Purchasing Info Record?

I did it and it works but I don't want to change the PIR everytime create a PO, cause a lot of PO should be maintained.

 

Please advise if another possibilities solution.

I check some thread but nothing match with the requirement.

 

Thanks before.

Wiliam Rusdianto

↧
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
Search