Hi Experts
I have set MRP parameters Re Order Level, Minimum Lot size and Maximum Stock parameter for a Material. Now I can generate PR automatically but my management requirement is that we should be able to create manual PR also and i know that we can create the same but management wants to control the quantity of manual PR through MRP parameters.
Please suggest how can i achieve this goal.
Regards
Ajay Goel
We have created STO for lumsum qty and then created OBD with PGI and GRN for breackup qty,but at the time of MIRO against STO full qty for invoice is showing ,and we want respective breakup qty in respect to OBD or GRN no. as reference.
Hello Expert,
I need to create an MM invoice using an iDoc, but a received the following error
Can you please advise?
Thanks,
Hi All,
I need a small clarification, For a PO i have attached a output type. Tell me how many times the output types will execute for one PO (or) Is there any limit ?
Thanks
Hi MM experts,
n IPO Release strategy, it is configured like this. Release indicator Y is blocked with changeable indicator 4 and Release indicator Z is Released with changeable indicator 6.
One PO is created, released, and outputted (print through ME9F).
Now user is changing the PO in the qty field; it is increased (10 EA to 15 EA). New release is not triggering. As per the changeable indicator 6; it should trigger new release strategy; Its not triggering.
pl help, Thanks in advance
Regards
Subbu
HI,
I have seen this question before, but no answers..
We are using output message to send IDOC to vendor.
When I change the PO, this output message is determined. We do not want this.
Fined tuned control. 2 Change is not set up for this output message
Multiple issuing is not ticked.
IN general data no routine / program are added for change output
There is no requirement maintained for this output message.
Another output message is set up the same, and this one is not triggerd?
What am I missing?
Thanks
B
Hi Experts,
I have a strange case here -
We have a service PO (Qty - 24 Hrs / Amt - 100 $) for which SES was posted for full Qty/Amt. Invoice was posted for full Qty but less amount (say 98 $).
This PO appears in the ME2N report for selection parameter RECHNUNG (Open invoice) with 'Still to be invoiced' amount as '0 $'. Please help.
Regards,
Akash
Hello Gurus,
I have a stock transport order between 2 storage location which belongs to the same plant. Besides the stock transport order is allocated to a sales order (account assigment category E). When I run the MD03, the system take into account the quantity of the stock transport order as a future entry and this is wrong. I need that the MRP has not into account the stock transport order as an entry.
As an important information, If I modify the stock transport order removing the account asignment category E (sales order), then the MRP doesn't take into account it, so this is correct.
Could anybody tell me how to get it?
Thanks in advanced.
Hi,
We had just activated business function LOG_EAM_ROTSUB and LOG_EAM_ROTSUB_2 in our system. This gives us flexibility in handling special stocks and among other allows us to use mvtyp 313 with special stock. Referring to SAP Help page here it is possible to perform 313 Q followed by 315 Q.
As mention in the SAP Help page, 313 Q will "removes the relevant quantity from the unrestricted-use stock of the original storage location and temporarily stores it in the blocked stock of the new storage location"; of which therefore I should be performing 343 Q (blocked project to unrestristed stock) NOT as 315 Q as suggest by SAP Help. And by the way, I did 343 Q and it work, but need to be posted manually rather than post place in storage referring to 313 Q material document.
This is where I have the problem. Is there any way to config for mvtype 313 Q to be followed by 343 Q instead of standard 315? Or any other workaround so I can have the 343 Q referring to 313 Q?
Appreciate any comments and solution.
Thanks.
Moving the MI10 transaction to the scanner we wanted to use BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to create the actual goods movement.
Research in SCN indicates that this cannot be done. It does work for 711 and 712. Unfortunately, using 711 and 712 increases reporting complexity. (I guess that in my book, an inventory adjustment is an inventory adjustment)
If I cannot use BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE then I will probably use FM MB_CREATE_INVENTORY_DIFFERENCE (used by MI10)
My question is:
Can I add MB11 as an allowable transaction for 701 and 702 in MM configuration OMJJ? MB11 is an allowable transaction for 711 and 712. Adding MB11 as as an allowable transaction for 701 and 702 allows 701 and 702 to be valid for BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE with good movement code 06
Is anyone familiar enough with this to explain any ramifications?
Thanks in advance
Dear SAP-experts,
A Material is discontinued at our company, the setting in MRP4 has been changed as can bee seen in figure 1:
figure1: MRP4 5090-0004-0008
the effective out date has been set for a while now (01-11-2013). However when a demand is created for the product SAP always look at the current available stock (as can bee seen in the figure 2), and conclude there is still enough available. In the example below the following demand for the material was needed:
| Date | Demand |
|---|---|
| 22.09.2014 | 76 |
| 24.09.2014 | 126 |
| 29.09.2014 | 84 |
| 15.10.2014 | 30 |
So the demand of 22.09.2014 (76 pieces) could be satisfied by material 5090-0004-0008
But for the demand of 24.09.2014 (126 pieces) only 2 items are left however the system still looks at the current stock level and concludes that 78 pieces will be taken from material 5090-0004-0008 and the rest (48 pieces) is taken of the new material 5001-0000-0025 (figure 3). The same applies for the demand on 29.09.2014 and 15.10.2014
figure2: MD04 5090-0004-0008
figure3: MD04 5001-0000-0025
How can I manage that for the demand of 24.09.2014 (126 pieces) the system only uses the 2 pieces that are left of material 5090-0004-0008 and that the rest of the demand (124 pieces) is set on material 5001-0000-0025.
So the demand for 5001-0000-0025 of 24.09.2014 should be set to 124 instead of the 48.
Thanks!
Hello,
We are trying to automate the process of sending the updated scheduling agreements if there are any differences in the validity range of the items. For this I need to trigger an EDI output from the program. I can directly call the routine RSNASTED routine after updating NAST entries but is there any standard way to trigger an EDI from the program ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Pavan.
Hi Experts,
We have a scenario for taxes in our Purchase Order that I need help understanding. Our Plant is based in the the NJ within the US. Occasionally, we purchase items from a Vendor based in NJ; however, the Supplier is based in PA. In this case, the items are taxable and subject to NJ and PA taxes. The PA tax is 6 % and the NJ tax is 7 %.
Based on NJ tax law, "If you make a purchase in another state which has a lower sales tax rate than New Jersey, use tax is due at the rate of 7%. If, however, that state has sales tax reciprocity with New Jersey, a credit is allowed for the sales tax paid to that state." In this particular case, we are interpreting any purchase from PA to NJ will incur a PA sales tax of 6 % and a NJ sales tax of 1 % (since there is a credit with PA and the PA tax is less than the NJ tax).
In our Vendor Master, we have the Goods Supplier partner tax jursidiction populate on the Invoice Tab of the Purchase Order which will give us the PA 6 % sales tax based on our configuration within transaction FXTP. However, the "use tax" for NJ is not determined in this fashion. It appears that the Taxes on this tab are only in relation to the PA tax jurisdiction code which is determined on the Invoice Tab. Under the conditions tab, we have conditions that will give us all of the necessary percentages. However, these percentages do not appear to be reflected for the taxes under the invoice tab.
Are the taxes under the conditions tab in any way linked to those taxes determined under the invoice tab of the purchase order? Can anyone help me understand the relationship between condition taxes (such as Condition Type NAVS) and the Taxes (under the Invoice tab) within a Purchase Order?
Thanks for your help in advance.
John
Hi All,
I have the PO s where the client use K as accnt assignment but in th PO quantity they have Eg: 10000 EA and OPU as 1 per USD. Instead of having in the quantity field as 1 AU and the net price as 10,000 USD , they are doing in a different way so that they can do partial GR. Is that the right approach or best practices? When client doing the GR they have flexibility of doing partial GR since the quantity is in 10000 EA , but the reporting will have issues. What would be the best practice in order to do Partial GR with account assignment K ?
Please help!!
Hi all,
Could somebody tell me what is Table name for movement type related to Consignemnt special stock K? I know T156 but their no special stock K
Thanks
SL
Dear All,
When user input a material in Material column, then short text should be grey out, while user input text only then system should consider text only and it should be editable mode.
regards
Hello All,
on 09.09.2014, EDI ( output type NEU, transmission medium 6) output type has triggered for more than 700 PO's which has been created in 2012 for several vendors and sent to supplier again as a duplicate copy. Suppliers are reaching client for this and some suppliers started sending goods which client has not ordered. There are no changes available in PO and users have not edited those PO's. There is no batch job scheduled to trigger output type. How else is possible for triggering output type in old PO. Please share your ideas.
Regards,
Prasath J
I have created several purchase organization for a company code and purchasing activities all happened in each purchasing org. Now i wanted to make it as a single (centralized) purchasing unit? What are the prerequisites that we should take in to account and what configs are required to make it as single without disturbing the business process?
Hi Friends
In confirmation control key for
under confirmation sequence cn you help me understanding importance of each field.
In our scenario inbound idoc is triggered for confirmations to our system but it does not update confirmation if delivery date given by vendor is not matching with what we mentioned. How can I allow to have inbound confirmations even id there is delivery date variance.
Thanks,
Kiran
Hello gurus,
I am trying to achieve this: We have one plant with two storage locations. There is one material stored in both locations.
Now I would like MRP to handle both storage locations independently, i.e. for example:
We define reorder point to 50 in locations A and 100 in location B. Let’s say, stock in A is 40 and 150 in B.
Now I would like MRP to create a PR for storage location A, because stock is below reorder point.
Is that possible in standard? I put SLoc MRP indicator to 2 in both storage locations but that only creates a stock transfer reservation from location B to A.
Cheers
Alicia