HI Experts ,
could you help me to found solution to prevent the invoice if it exceeded Quantity Received [GR]
↧
pause Invoice Verification If it Exceeded Quantity Received
↧
Negative Stocks
Hello SAP Gurus ,
System allows negative stocks , Even configuration not happens .
Where I Have to check and configurations happen where ?
I checked in material master in plants Tab ...........
Please suggest me , How it is happening ?
↧
↧
Regarding generating report for SES
HI All,
Kindly provide Tcode or method for generating report for SES (Service Entry Sheet ) for contract (outline Agreement) for specefic cost centers.
I read that we have to go to me2k to list the POs then find SES form thegenerated PO.
but the number for PO is hundereds.
thanks,
Ali
↧
Scheduled for delivery Qty in MMBE/Batch
Hi.. Could someone know how to check scheduled for delivey quantity per material per given batch. i tried with LIKP VBUK tables but they are not getting delivery completed indicator and i have no choice to know that accurately.. FM for MB_SELECT_SD_SCHEDULED_STOCK doesn't work since i need ot know per batch in a given storage location..
Please share your thought?
↧
Freight capitalization in shipment document.
Dear MM Gurus
I have a scenario which I need to configure but I am confused whether is it possible or not? Scenario is that we will create STO and outbound delivery. Freight will not be entered in STO. Stock will be issued with 641 movement type and after PGI we will create shipment document with VT01N. Freight vendor will be added in shipment document. After this we will create shipment cost document and freight charges will be determined and calculated here. We will transfer this to FI using freight PO and then MIRO for freight payment to transporter/vendor. Process with T codes will be
ME21N > STO
VL10B > Outbound Delivery
VT01N > Shipment Document
VI01 > Shipment cost document
VI02 > Transfer freight charges to FI using freight PO determination
MIRO > Payment of freight charges to vendor
I am not adding MIGO because it is understood that stock which we have issued will obviously be received from receiving plant. This is plant to plant transfer in same company. Requirement is that freight charges should be charged to inventory or in other words freight which we have entered in shipment cost document should be capitalized.
Another requirement is that there will be two delivery orders in same shipment document. One from sale order and one from STO. I have checked this and system is allowing to add provided that there is same route in both deliveries. Sale order freight charges will be posted to expense GL and STO delivery freight charges should be capitalized. I have done sale order part but got stuck in STO. Is it possible that we post sale order delivery freight to expense GL and STO delivery freight to inventory in same shipment cost document.
Have anyone of you ever configure this or have you any idea that how to capitalized freight charges in transportation process? I have done this in normal STO process but not using transportation management.
Quick response will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Mohsin
↧
↧
Problem with auto Inbound delivery creation at the time of GI posting against OBD
Hi team
I have problem with auto inbound delivery creation at the time of GI posting for an outbound delivery.
My process is..
Created outbound delivery (HOD) through MB11 from one HU SLOC to another HU SLOC (both are WM managed) with movement 313.
Create Transfer Order in LT03 and pick relevant HUs.
Confirm Transfer order in LT12.
Post goods issue in VL02N .
Material document (Mvmt 313) and Inbound delivery (HID) creation with movement type 315.
In Quality system Inbound delivery is not getting created automatically as it was happening in DEV system without any problem.
I can't to go with SPED output type as business scenarios are variable.
We have batch management active.
Can you guys please help me what would be wrong in QAS?
Thanks
↧
Mail Content to PO Reminder / Expeditures ( ME91F )
Dear MM Gurus ,
As per the requirement , I have to set up three different reminder e-mails as per "purchasing value Key".
1. Configured PV keys
2. Maintained in the Material Master
3. Info records Updated
4. Copied to PO as usual.
5. Defined output types in order to capture the prints & "external send" option to reminder e-mail.
In this scenario , the reminder expedites dates triggered.
I have made the print ( ZNEU ) first and called ME91F for the expediter. It works but having a problem with e-mail body.
How can I write e-mail body to the vendor to capture these automatically. Please help.
↧
Post MRKO with different Company Code
Hello Experts,
In transaction MIRO it is possible to change the Company Code that receives the invoice in order to post the accounts payable in a different company to the one where the goods receipt was posted. However we are unable to find a way to do this in the MRKO consignment process, is it possible to change the company code for the invoice through standard means?
Best Regards
↧
Document Date for PO
Hello ,
I have a doubt why system is taking 1 day advance when I am creating Vendor and Purchase Order .
Actually Today (14.4.2014) created a PO But at the time of PO creation system show 15.04.2014 as Document Date .
I have checked in Report ME2* and ME80FN to attach screenshot .There its not shown entered (system) date
Pleas help me ....
↧
↧
Articles with Split Valuation when Split Valuation is not Activated
We are using SAP retail 7.3. We use a data migration tool to load our articles, cost, inventory, etc. During one of our loads, our tool was able to load several articles with split valuation. Mind you, split valuation is not activated for our company. With this done, we can't load cost or quantity into the correct valuation class preventing the stores from selling these products. I have tried using the manufacturing deletion tactics for the valuation types with MM02 and MASS but continue to get the error (Valuation data already exists for valuation types that are not compatible with the new valuation category) If anyone has experienced this or has any suggestions, it would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Bryan
↧
User Exits/Enhancements/FM in MM
Hello SAP Gurus ,
I have a doubt When User exits , enhancements and FM are used.
I never worked on it .Can Any one explain with an example so that it will be useful to all people who check this Issue .
I have find in Google but not find the solution ?SO Many given so many solutions ............I need with an example ...
↧
How to populate partner function for stock transport order in ME21n/ME22n
Please advise is there any way we can determine the partner functions to be populated in ME21n.
I have gone through sap note 117537 they said it is not required and not available in SAP standard way.
Then tried implementing user exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_013 and populating the required partner functions in XEKPA[].
It is getting triggered and i can see the values in table but after save i go and see in display ME23N i can't find any partner functions.
Later i found some interesting thread in SDN use exit: EXIT_SAPMM06E_012 and get the values from (SAPLMEPO)XEKPA[] in case of ME23N.
even this is not working.
DATA it_ekpa LIKE ekpa OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA name(50) VALUE '(SAPLMEPO)XEKPA[]'.
DATA name1(50) VALUE '(SAPMM06E)XEKPA[]'.
FIELD-SYMBOLS <f1> TYPE any .
IF sy-tcode+4(1) = 'N'.
ASSIGN (name) TO <f1>.
ELSE.
ASSIGN (name1) TO <f1>.
ENDIF.
it_ekpa[] = <f1>.
Any idea ?
Thanks,
Mahesh gattu
↧
goods receipt against inbound delivery
After an import po has been created then an inbound delivery is created also.So after the inbound delivery we do goods receipt and our goods receipt is done against po even when their is inbound delivery.The reason why the goods receipt is done with reference to the po is that we have different vendors for all the delivery costs for example we have a vendor for custom charges, a vendor for freight charges, a vendor for terminal charges.so the goods receipt is done against the po so that when doing the miro they can select the different vendors.But inbound delivery is done with a single vendor and if the goods receipt is done against the inbound delivery it might acquire all the costs to that vendor.Is there any method whereby we can be able to do our goods receiot with reference to inbound delivery that will also capture all the delivery costs
↧
↧
MD04 - Deleted Delivery is still displayed
Hello everyone,
I hope you can help me on this issue. Return deliveries keep showing in MD04 even though they have already been deleted.
As a workaround I have deleted them via SE38 and SDRQCR21.
However I managed to reproduce the issue. Here is an example:
- ME21N - PO created (type NB), delivery date 02.01.2014
- VL10* - delivery created on 21.01.2014 (after the delivery date)
- No WH activities performed, the delivery is simply deleted
- In MD04 it is still displayed with Receipt/Requirements date of 02.01.2014.
Do you have any idea why this happens and how it could be avoided?
Thanks,
J.
↧
Reference RFQ - not copying account assignment details for limit
Hello,
Please read below system behaviour what I understood.
We r creating Service RFQ with reference to Purchase requisition(service).
Account assignment details for service and limit copied to further Purchase order(service) ( this is fine)
Now suppose we create RFQ by copying to existing RFQ and when we create Purchase order it is asking for "account assignment for limit".
Copied RFQ is linked with main purchase requisition and details updated in table and status tab.
My question is why system not copying account assignment details for Limit only ? as it copies same for service.
Is there any additional configuration for copying details from limit tab to purchasing documents?
Kindly advise.
Thank You,
Guruprasad
↧
Incorrect postings for subcontracting account
Hello,
The subcontracting account is not equal to zero.
Component material with S price and end material with V price:
During the incoming invoice there have to be the following postings, according sap help :
Subcontracting in Invoice Verification - Managing Special Stocks (MM-IM) - SAP Library
-525 KBS
500 WRX
25 BSV
25 BSX
-25 FRL
But i've got another postings:
-525 KBS
500 WRX
24 BSV
24 BSX
-23 FRL
After this the subcontractimg account is not equal zero
But during the cancellation of invoice - i've got the "correct" postings:
525 KBS
-500 WRX
-25 BSV
-25 BSX
25 FRL
And now we have some balance on the subcontracting account - it is not equal to zero.
Could you please advise what i have to do? - that to avoid it in future.
Thanks in advance
↧
ME31K Net Price not Update
Dear All,
In a service contract ME31K net price(ESLL- NETWR) of service not updated.its shown zero value in gray field on every time.
We are using standard procedure for service contract :MS0000".and also i have check PRS condition but it doesn't work.
I have also read many thought relelated to same issue but not getting proper answer.
Please help on priority basis.
Thanks & Regards,
Dishant Mistry
↧
↧
Removal of Best before date/Shlef Life Expiration date check from movement type 325
Hi Xperts
WE have activated BBD/SELD check at Plant level.However we have marked Blank(No check) value foe SLED/BBD check for the movement type 325 in SPRO.Still we are getting BBD/SLED error message while transferring expired batch from one stor loc(blocked stok) to another stor loc(blocked stock) via 325.This is happening for Material Movement 311 as well.
Could you please suggest what needs to be done in this case.Shall we mark Indicator 3(No check on Issue) against these movement types.
Regards
↧
PO"S Release massively by authirased person
Dear i am SD Consultant
M_EINK_FRG Is the release code To release POS Manuvally By authirased person in ME29N
In PFCG T.code we have to assign M_EINK_FRG This one
My doubt is Is it possible to assign By functionel consultants or We need technicel consultants ?
And if authirased person wants to release MASS PO"S Which T.code we have to use ?
Thanks a lot
↧
GR Slip Print
Dear SAP Guru,
In the time of GR via MIGO, I did not tick "Print via Output Control". Now I want to take a print. How do I get the print out.
Thanks for your kind advance co-operations.
Best Regards,
Shoyeb
↧