Guys,
We have a scenario wherein the PO is raised against a network & activity combination. After receiving the goods against the network, we have to transfer the left overs to the storage location. So we do a movement type 581 from netowrk to storage location. It flows fine. My question is this:
The actual cost does not debit from network GL and credit to storage location GL. It shows the storage loc GL acc as 0. How do i transfer the actual cost too?
Hello,
I have two questions related to automating certain process in dealing with STOs -
Question 1 –
Plant A raised an STO –> for 5000 KGs
Plant B (issuing plant) issues –> 4500 KGs
Plant A (receiving plant) receives –> 4300 KGs (This is less because of manual error in loading material)
Is there a possibility that as soon as the person enters the received quantity, the system finds that there is a difference in the quantity issued and received, and a mail be triggered to the issuing plant (Plant B) saying that there is a difference in the quantities?
Question 2–
Plant A raises a STO -> for 5000 KGs.
Plant B issues -> 4500 KGs
Plant A receives -> 4500 KGs.
So, 500 KGs are pending from Plant A.
Now Plant A again wants 5000 KGs and hence wants to raise a STO.
Is it a possibility that before a person at Plant A raises a fresh STO, he should be reminded of the quantities pending against the STOs which he had preciously raised.
Alternately, The person at Plant B is prompted by the system that certain quantities are left over from the previous STO and should be cleared off first?
Kindly let me know.
Thank you.
Dear Team,
Is there any report which gives me output on the basis of contract condition scales maintained in contract.
Regards,
Arvind.
Hi Experts,
Its just 2 months that i am working in SAP MM, so i request u to please help me. The client for whom i am working has the requirement that....
If the user is creating a PR for ELECTRICAL then,only electrical materials types will be selected,no other materials from engineering or mechanical etc will be accepted in that PR,
So, my question is, how can i do that, where i can put the validation that only a certain type of PR will accept the type of its materials not the other types.
Regards,
Shibu
Hello. Good Morning.
I have a report that I want to archive but the lower part of the box is not shown.
As you can see in the attachment, the box shows the option of printing or archive, but in the other report this is not shown. How can I do so it can be shown.?
regards, Belinda
Dear All,
Suppose in particular document type of PO , I am having 100 items and out of that 3 items
are same, by mistake me entered at 3 times ,actually it should be in single row only.
I want to avoid this , means when I am going to add already entered item again , system
should give me warning and if its plant and storage location are same , then
system should not allow me. If plant and storage location are different system
should allow me.
Is it possible this by customisation.
regards,
Mahesh
Dear All.
I have gone through number of links and discussion regarding Stock Transfer Order. I am still left with some doubts.
Say if there is 10 different plants and each plant make stock transfer to each one with SD Delivery and Billing (for shipping). In this case, we cannot make the assignment of Customer&Vendor.
1. Is it possible to route these kind of scenarios through PO route?
2. If 313/315 is used - what about the SD Delivery and Billing.
This discussion and the document provided by Jurgen is helpful:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3185038
Regards,
Lakhya
Hello,
can somebody please help me with understanding document flow between customer and vendor.
My questions is - when we create PO release it and send IDOC ORDERS.ORDERS05 to Vendor system on base of our PO. In vendor system start process of creation Sale order, and when Vendor save this Sale order we suppose get in customer system Idoc ORDRSP (order response), and after we receive it in our PO on tab confirmation we suppose to see record. But why in IDOC ORDRSP.ORDERS05 we don't see segment EIEDP51(which exactly is our confirmation tab in PO) but not in ORDERS05 ?
In this blog, I like to share the SAP provided option to skip migration path for frequently used configuration tasks
like Purchase group, MRP Controller, FI period, etc.
Lets take the example of Purchase group:
Purchase group ID are assigned to Procurement individuals with some contact details, who handles Purchasing
documents. In most business cases, you may come across frequent addition/exit of buyers, changes in business
role and contact details which leads to update the Purchase group configuration most frequently.
This configuration could be done directly in PRD instead of migrating it, by activating the current setting option.
System Settings:
- Use transaction SOBJ
- Select the related object and activate the current settings
For Purchase group, choose V_024 and V_024_N for printer assignment to Purchase group;
- Select the config task following SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Create Purchasing group
- Menu > Edit > Display IMG Activity
It will provide us with a transaction which could be used to for direct updates. Also refer the below notes for details.
For those, who follows weekly migration where business have to wait for a week to get this change updated, it will
reduce the lead time quite substantially.
Helpful Notes:
OSS Notes 356483
OSS Notes 135028
Hi all,
I have a material whose current MAP is 1000 rs. and the PO price was 900 rs. When the GR was posted for this PO, then the stock account was hit with 1000 rs. Now when the MIRO is entered, the 100 rs difference is hitting prd account. Pls suggest if its a standard process and what is the solution for it.
Regards,
Hello.
My customer is trying to find out what is the recommendation and what do other customers use as a type of account for the following in subcontracting:
External Services
Consumption
Changes in Stock
Another words are they expense, balance sheet, etc.
Do each of them hav eto be a certain type or is it up to the customer.
What do most customers use for these.
Thanks, Dan
Hi All,
I am making PO with particular purchasing group.
I have attached that purchasing group with default printer in config
Spro>mat magnt>pur>message>assign output device to pur grp
Now I am making PO and when I see that POs > message
I cant see default printer in logical destination of communication method.
hat is pending in my configue?
Regards,
Mahesh
Dear gurus,
I have PO Version management and Release procedure activated and both are working fine except for 2 fields. As per design of PO release procedure (indicators 6 or 4), release is getting triggered for any change in net order value. I have used Total PO net order value, PO doc type, plants as characteristics. Other than this if there is any other change in PO that is having no impact on total net order value, PO should not go for approval which was happening correctly prior to activation of version management. I have activated PO version management and set up address fields such as ADRC - [CITY1, Name 1, POST_CODE1, REGION] and delivery date field EKET-EINDT as 'fields relevant to print out of changes'.
Any changes to these fields triggers new version, but at the same time I am getting message 'Releases already effected will be canceled - Message no. 06685'. This is incorrect as I have not used any of these fields in PO approval to reset.
I need to know what is going wrong.
Thanks in Advance.
AB
Hi all,
I have a po price requirement.
Our company purchases parts from vendor then directly sends to different companies---subcontractor vendor. In PO item,fill in subcontractor vendor and choose SC vend.
However, the purchase price will be different depends on where we send to.
For example:
Vendor A
Material: B001 x 1 pc
Directly send to EMS B
Purchase price: $100 x 1
Vendor A
Material: B001 x 1 pc
Directly send to EMS C
Purchase price: $120 x 1
In this case, the vendor and material are same, but the purchase price is different, because “send to party” is different.
Now we only have “purchase info record” can control purchase price. It means that if the vendor and material are same,
There is only one price.
But the company needs to set the purchase price by the subcontractor.
Any solution for it?
Regards
Tony
Dear Guru,
Please kindly help me when I create TO for Putaway material into storage bin, the system show the message below.
Error in spool C call: spool overflow
Message no. SPOC003
My Step is PO -> GR -> Putaway [Error]
Regards,
Saiyaman
hi all,
while printing PO i am getting following error :
Error in spool C call: spool overflow
Message no. SPOC003
please help to solve this error
Does anyone know if it is possible to determine packaging based on a material in a production or BOM?
Thanks!
Pam
Hi,
I created a condition type called ZRB1 (with percentage) and reused existing condition table and access sequence in the sytem. Further, I have maintained condition master in MEK1 correctly. However, for some reason, the pricing condition did not show during PO creation even if I hits "Update" button in the ME21N screen.
Hope you can provide a clue what goes wrong. My best guess is that maybe system does not allow me to re-used existing condition table? which I do not think is the real reason for this problem.
Even when I hits the Update button with "B - Carry out new pricing", it still not appear. And strange enough, only two access sequence appear in the tree list if compare to the access sequence above, and it said record missing while I have maintained it (see above).
Now, if only I manually entered the price % in ME21N, the Pricing ananlysis shown...
Thanks,
Daniel
Hi ,
Our client is using WE03 and has requested if they can print individual GR slip.
I have configured output type WE01 to print the individual GR slip and it works fine if the PO items belongs to different plant ie the Items are printed as individual slips .
Issue :If the PO has 2 or more items which belong same plants ( for eg:XXXX, YYYY) then the GR is printed as Collective slip eventhough the indicator is checked as individual slip in the MIGO.
Can you please let me know if i am missing any configuration
Thanks
Sai
Dear All,
I am trying to restrict the PO price tolerance with material price upper limit 10%. I have done the configuration in define tolerance per price variance in MM-Purchasing-purchase order.
Systems is showing warming message if there is any deviation of PO price with material price when I am giving W in message type 06207, 06205.
But when I am giving E in the above message type, system is not considering the upper limit 10%, instead even if there is 1 Rs more than the material price, system showing error message about effective price more than material price.
My question is why system is not considering 10% upper limit of material price??
Need your help in solving the issue.