Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live

Auto Free Goods Tick in PO

$
0
0

Hi Masters,

 

i have a requirement.

 

For certain material/vendor combination when the PO is created , automatically "Free Goods" checkbox should be ticked.

 

I have read some posts on this, also maintained the config / master data settings / Condition records.

But it adds some free goods to the original line item in PO.

 

Eg if i create PO for Material A for 10 qty.  another line Item gets added with Qty 5 as free goods. ( I have maintained a condition record )

 

But i want when i create a PO for Material A / vendor A combination, all the 10 quantity should automatically be marked as free goods.

 

How can i achieve this ?  Is there any standard way ? Or will i have to go for any enhancement ?

 

Thanks


Unable to close STO because GR qty does not match the total PO ordered qty.

$
0
0

Hello Experts,

I have a problem with an STO, which I want to close out but cannot.

The delivery note and GI done against it have been completed for the total PO quantity.

However, while GR was done at the receiving plant, they were done for lesser quantities than the delivery note/GI, resulting in a situation where GR does not match the total PO ordered qty.

 

In other words delivery note qty = GI qty = PO order qty , but GR qty is falling short by around 3.5 lb. (During the GR, they had some three places after the decimal). The result is that the status of the PO shows  "still to deliver" as 3.5 pounds.In MMBE, also, it shows the qty 3.5 Lb as "on order stock".

 

The requirement now is to close out this PO,because this 3.5 Lb is no longer required but it keeps propping up in the material planning, which is undesirable.

It is no longer possible to reverse any of the documents because this is a very old PO and the batches associated have long ago been used up.

 

I have tried to set the "delivery completed" indicator in the item (there was only one item in the STO) but got the following error:

 

"Delivery completed" indicator cannot be set for item 00010

Message no. 06848

Diagnosis

You have set the "delivery completed" indicator for a stock transfer item.

System Response

You can only set the "delivery completed" indicator in stock transfer items if

 

  • the sum of the goods issue quantities in the supplying plant equals the sum of the goods receipt quantities in the receiving plant
  • the sum of the delivery note quantities is equal to the sum of the goods receipt quantities.

Procedure

Cancel the "delivery completed" indicator.

 

---------------------------

 

Please advise as how we can close this PO, because it keeps interfering with our present planning.

Shall we be able to create another delivery with just this remianing amt of 3.5 Lb and finish it somehow?

 

Regards

 

P.R

Paying Vendor in Installments Using Terms of Payment

$
0
0

Hi Friends,

In this document I'm going to explain about paying vendor in installments using terms of payment.

 

In SAP we can pay to the vendor in installments by using payment terms.

Example: Total invoice amount Rs.2000 Dated.01.07.2013 and this amount is paid to the vendor installments as given below

Installment1 Rs.1000 on 11.07.2013

Installment2 Rs.500 on 21.07.2013

Installment3 Rs.500 on 31.07.2013

 

the configuration required to achieve this is explained below.

 

 

Step1. We need to create one main terms of payment in transaction code OBB8 or in the path as shown below

0.JPG

 

Here select installment payment check box and select base line date as required. Enter the required description as shown below.

 

2.JPG

 

Step2. Create separate payment terms for each of installment and enter the number of days after which the installment is to be paid as shown below.

Ex. IF you have to pay in 3 installments after every 10 days of baseline date you have to create three payment terms with number of days as 10,20 & 30 respectively as shown below

 

3.JPG

 

4.JPG

 

5.JPG

 

Step3. Assign Main terms of payment to the installment payment terms and define the percentage of total invoice amount to be paid in that respective installment. Transaction code OBB9 or follow below path.

 

6.JPG

For example 50% of the total invoice amount is to be paid in first installment(after 10days from base line date), and remaining amount is to be paid in two half's in the next two installments(after 20 and 30 days from baseline date respectively).

 

7.JPG

 

 

TESTING:

To test the above configuration, create a purchase order and enter the main payment terms in the PO header.

 

8.JPG

 

9.JPG

then carryout the goods receipt for PO  and do logistic invoice verification in MIRO.

10.JPG

In invoice simulation observe three line items posted against the vendor.

11.JPG

 

Also observe accounting document is created with 3 line items, the total amount to be paid to the vendor is distributed as per the percentage specified and each having separate payment terms and due date as per the configuration

 

12.JPG

-End of document


Thanks for reading and please share your feedback

TAB missing in trx_IE02 after the SAP HANA upgrade

$
0
0

folks,

 

has anyone of you encountered this before, TABs missing in trx_IE02 -> change equipment installation location

(shift+ F7) after the SAP HANA upgrade ?

 

screenshot attached before and after the SAP hana upgrade.

PO Archiving

$
0
0

Hello Everyone,

 

I need your expert comment on PO Archiving....

 

As part of PO closure we are setting the delivery completed indicator through WPO1 and later on there will be activities coming up with PO archiving.

 

Would like to know what is the criteria and steps (if any document with sap screen shot) required for PO archive.

 

Is delivery completed (EKPO- LOEKZ) at Line item is pre-requisite for PO arcving ? Is it mandatory to set delivery completed indicator at PO line items for PO archiving or it will set automatically as part of PO archiving process?

 

Pls Advise...

 

Regards,

AC

planning strategy group and sales order forecast consumption

$
0
0

Hello gurus,

 

can anyone please throw some light on this sceanrio. We have a Plant A which is just a warehouse, Plant B does all the production of finished goods. We get sales orders on finished materials in both the plants. When we get sales orders in plant A for finished materials, Stock trnasport orders procure the stock from plant B and stage the stock in Plant A until the delivery date is due from plant A.

 

I'm thinking, if i maintain planning strategy group of 52, planning material and planning plant in Plant A in MRP 3 view of the material master, then whenever we get sales order, in plant A, it will/should reduce the forecast in Plant B for the planning material. Is this correct? or how can we make this happen?

 

 

Thanks

Anusha

Scheduling Agreement - Priority for GR Processing Time

$
0
0

Dear Forum Members,

 

While defining Scheduling agreement for a material we can define the GR processing time and Planned Delivery time,likewise we

 

define in the material master also.

 

1.While running MRP which one has the higher priority?

 

2.After running MRP for the schedule line we are able to see only the delivery date,is there any setting to display the release date

 

or the start date based on the planned delivery time of the scheduling agreement?

 

Please suggest.

 

Regards

S Mangalraj

Order Multiple in Purchasing

$
0
0

Hello,

 

Can you please help me with how do I maintain order multiples for material in either material master or in InfoRecord? I don't see any standard field to maintain the same.

 

Thank you.

 

Rohan


EKPO-NETWR not adding up freight

$
0
0

Hi Expert,

 

My pricing config are like this. Pricing schema

 

  • 10 - PB00
  • 20 - PX00
  • 30 - ZFR (freight)
  • 40 - ZST (stocking free)
  • 50 - Net value -- From 10- to20
  • 60 - Actual Price - 10-20

 

Created a PO with qty 4 and price is 2 each

 

My item level of that PO condition value shows

  • PBxx - 4
  • ZFR - 3
  • Net value 7

 

My requirement is to show that freight cost to EKPO-NETWR field. It only shows $8 in NETWR. I want that to show 8+3=11. Thank you very much. Is it possible?

Vendor Master "CITY" Field Alphanumeric Field

$
0
0

Vendor Master Address data  "CITY" field not saving the numeric value. Though it is allowing to enter numeric value but when saving it is not saving the numeric data only it is saving the characters . Say for example the city name is "Newyork1" it is only saving Newyork not saving 1. Is there any configuration needed for this to save numeric value.

ME2DP - Down payment amount

$
0
0

Hi

 

We have activated  LOG_MMFI_P2P business function in EHP5. System  allows user to make the down payment (f-48) more than PO value thru ME2DP transaction. Is there anyway we can throw Warning or Error message?

 

Thanks,

 

ASB

IS MIRO calculate the amount on PO Payment term basis.

$
0
0

For Ex- If we maintain Pmt Terms like a) 10% Adv b) 20% agst del  c) Bal agst successfull commissioning then system will calculate the amount of payment accordingly at time of MIRO. or restrict any over amount entry. ?

How to calculate stock value same as MB5B Report....

$
0
0

Hi,

 

i want to calculate a closing stock value in my function module. using different tables.

can any one tell the table name and how to get closing stock value.

 

I want a value which is exactly match with MB5B Report.

 

 

Thanks

Haresh

delete material allocation

$
0
0

Experts,

 

A material at the time of GR / PO we are allocated as special stock for one client/SO now we need to remove this allocation and need to deliver another client. kindly advice the remedy.

 

Regards,

,

Time dependent scheduling agreement delivery cost not included in MIGO postings

$
0
0

Time dependent scheduling agreement delivery cost not included in MIGO postings

 

I will explain each and every step

 

1.  Scheduling agreement created with doc type 'xxx' copied from LP

 

2.  Maintained base price, packing value with tax Excise non credit and CST

 

3.  As per my requirement tax should be applicable on assessable value(base price+packing)

 

4.  Maintained Delivery schedule

 

5.  While doing MIGO, tax is calculated on base price but not on assessable value(packing value is not getting displayed in entries posted).

 

But in PO it is working very fine.

 

 

Can any one please help me on this issue?


IS there is any provision in SAP that there could be more than 2 types of retention at a time?

$
0
0

HELLO MM experts,

 

 

WE are facing special case  while doing service order, we need more than 2 types of  retention at a time. IN configration part there we can config only one retention for one Service order.

 

 

Need one Hold option as well, sometimes  we want to hold some ammount  like 10 %. there is no option for that.

 

waiting for your suggestion.

 

 

 

Best

ABHIJEET KANKANI.

Service Master for PM orders

$
0
0

HI Gurus,

 

I need a help from you in knowing the below issues :

 

My client procure services from vendor and that need to configured now. I have created a service master and now want to know where i can assign that service master to service order?? Do i need to create SSC (Standard service catalog) for using service master in my service order?? I can see a catalog option in operations details "EXTERNAL" tab, Is this related to SSC?

 

Awaiting for your reply.....

In MM02 appears error message MG144.

$
0
0

When changing Materials with MM02 appears error message MG144. "The field & is defined as a required field; it does not contain any entry"  But the fields were already set before.

Has anyone a solution to this error? Is there any new note to implement?

Net Price not getting updated after changing Expected Value in Service PO

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Net Price of the line item not getting updated after changing the "Expected value" in Limits for PO with Item Category D. In conditions tab this new value getting captured for Condition type PBXX and showing it as inactive with yellow sign. Prior to changing the PO, PXX value was 0 and inactive with red sign.

Service PO – GL account

$
0
0

Hi,

When the material group in a service PO is changed, the GL account is not changed.   But when material group in a NON service PO is changed, system is able to re-determine the GL account.  Is this by design?  Or any missing configuration on my part? 

 

Best Regards,

NG

Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live


Latest Images

<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>