Quantcast
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

PO Version management and Release procedure conflict for delivery date

May 1, 2013, 1:05 am
$
0
0

Dear gurus,

I have PO Version management and Release procedure activated and both are working fine except for 2 fields. As per design of PO release procedure (indicators 6 or 4), release is getting triggered for any change in net order value. I have used Total PO net order value, PO doc type, plants as characteristics. Other than this if there is any other change in PO that is having no impact on total net order value, PO should not go for approval which was happening correctly prior to activation of version management. I have activated PO version management and set up address fields such as ADRC - [CITY1, Name 1, POST_CODE1, REGION] and delivery date field EKET-EINDT as 'fields relevant to print out of changes'.

Any changes to these fields triggers new version, but at the same time I am getting message 'Releases already effected will be canceled - Message no. 06685'. This is incorrect as I have not used any of these fields in PO approval to reset.

I need to know what is going wrong.

Thanks in Advance.

 

AB

↧
Search

PO output message needs to be Blocked for one particular Document Type

March 3, 2016, 6:16 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Here's one interesting requirement that I received. i tried searching the forum but couldnt find an answer. As part of Cutover, Client wants to load their Purchase orders pertaining to their Business Unit into an existing Production system. In doing so they want to stop any Output messages for ONE particular Document type. they will open the client before loading and we need to make sure to stop the messages to trigger. We suggested removing the Schema assigned to application " EF" but this would mean the output will not trigger to other BUs as well. I am also thinking about removing condition records for this particular Document type and then add back them once POs are loaded. Is it possible or are there any other way to block the output messages to be triggered? please advise

 

Thank you

Surendra

↧
↧

GBB account offestting

February 10, 2016, 1:59 am
$
0
0

Dear All, we have unique requirement from our client , we are transferring the stock from the block stock from 344 to scrapping 555 . normal accounting entry will be BSX account debit and GBB credit But our requirement is it should it to same GL account of GBB as  Debit and Credit when they are using 555 from MB1A we have checked OMWN as well we tried to change the account modification also but it has not met our requirement can any one help us please Regards Hidyath

↧

How to create application area for system message for purchase requisition?

March 3, 2016, 10:44 pm
$
0
0

Hi SAP Consultants,

 

Have seen this configuration SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Environment Data > Define Attributes of System Messages.  Would want to create system message error for creation of PR (ME51N).  May I ask where can I create application area for ME51N or for any purchase requisition tcode?

 

Thanks and regards,

Jeremiah Dollente

↧

Invoice posting and reversal: currecy exchange rate discrepency

March 3, 2016, 5:11 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

We have a couple of cases of a different behavior to standard (currency rates are just for example):

 

1. Day 1, GR posted for 100 SGD (200 USD). SGD is the PO & vendor currency. Company code currency is USD.

2. Day 5, Invoice posted for 100 SGD (195 USD). In this case, the 5 USD was credited to PO GL. (GR/IR clearing indicator checked).

3. Same day, Invoice reversed. 100 SGD and 195 USD reversed to GR IR account.

4. Same day, Invoice posted for again 100 SGD, but this time, 95 SGD (195 USD) is debited from GR/IR and 5 SGD from PO GL.

 

Another case is where an Credit note was posted against a posted Invoice of 100 USD (150 CAD). But, only 90 USD is reversed from Vendor account and rest 10 USD is taken from PO GL and credited 100 USD to GR/IR. If we switch to local currency, 150 CAD is retrieved from Vendor account. In this case, the local currency is CAD and PO/Vendor currency is USD.

 

Please share your thoughts.

 

 

Regards,

Akash Prekar

↧
↧

Purchasing freight account (DIFFERENT ACCOUNT)

March 4, 2016, 6:13 am
$
0
0

Dear All,

 

we have a lot of freight condition in M/08 transaction.

F.I.

311FRA1Nolo %200000FRE
312FRB1Nolo assoluto200000FRE
313FRC1Nolo/quantità200000FRE
314RUE1% accant. neutri200000FRE
315RUB1Accant. neutri ***.200000FRE
316RUC1Accant.neutri/ qtà200000FRE
317ZOA1Dogana %200000FRE
318ZOB1Dogana assol.200000FRE
319ZOC1Dogana/quantità200000FRE

We have this scenario: Freight cost  are posted to separate G/L account.  Our customer wants to differentiate  the G/L account for condition type: (ACCOUNT KEY) not the (ACCRUAL)- the ACCRUAL is the same.  In this moment we have FRE for all account keys  of our Freight conditions.

Can we change FRE to different account keys for each freight condition type? And assign to them different G/L account in OBYC transaction?

FI

11FRA1Nolo %200000ZR1
312FRB1Nolo assoluto200000ZR1
313FRC1Nolo/quantità200000ZR1
314RUE1% accant. neutri200000ZR2
315RUB1Accant. neutri ***.200000ZR2
316RUC1Accant.neutri/ qtà200000ZR2
317ZOA1Dogana %200000ZR3
318ZOB1Dogana assol.200000ZR3
319ZOC1Dogana/quantità200000ZR3

 

If it's possible, is there any problem about FIFO/LIFO Calculation & MYMP table? In the program LOLIFF02 there are some account key written in it to not duplicate the freight cost during the entry of freight invoice items (for the freight cost which were already taken into account during the goods receipts).

 

FORM ranges_fill.

 

   CLEAR: ra_ktosl, ra_buzid, ra_koart.

   REFRESH: ra_ktosl, ra_buzid, ra_koart.

   ra_ktosl-option = ra_buzid-option = ra_koart-option = eq.

   ra_ktosl-sign = ra_buzid-sign = ra_koart-sign = 'E'.

 

   ra_ktosl-low = 'BSV'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'BUV'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'DIF'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'EIN'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'EKG'.

  APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'FRE'. <-----------------  ?????????????????????'

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'FRL'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'FRN'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'KDR'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'RAP'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.

   ra_ktosl-low = 'UMB'.

   APPEND ra_ktosl.


How can we add the new key accounts?


Thanks in advance


Best regards


Alba

↧

Is it Master Data or Transaction Data?

March 4, 2016, 6:27 am
$
0
0

Hi:

 

Need your suggestions/advise:

 

Requirement  is to show Ship To "DUNS#" in our Purchase Orders. currently we do not have the DUNS#. 

 

With the possibility of having several DUNS# for our company - several plants, Warehouses, dock doors etc.,

wondering how this data should be handled  should it be in MDM system or should it be kept in R/3 system or

keep it as reference data (based on Co. Code).

 

While setting up a vendor in MDM, DO NOT know which DUNS to be assigned to a vendor since deliveries

could be different duns# on different POs and different days.  More so since this needs to appearing in PO

after the assignment while placing an order!!

 

Should DUNS# be kept in MDM (could be a huge table) or set up a table in R/3?  Please ADVISE.

 

Thanks in Advance....  Suman

↧

Pricing CUFR CUIN CUPZ access not made field initialized in ME21N

February 29, 2016, 7:19 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

we're adding the pricing from the Import pricing procedure to our purchase order. To achieve this we have taken all the regular SAP pricing conditions for import, especially CUIN and CUFR which are covered by access sequence CUPZ.

 

When the purchase order is created, the condition records exist, the transactional data necessary appears in the PO, it also appears in tables EIKP and EIPO.

 

But the pricing is not possible because "Access not made (initialised field)"

 

Can anyone help why I cannot get two of the five fields in the access sequence?

 

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Screen Shot 2016-02-29 at 16.10.02.png

 

The fields are Import code number (KOMP-COIMP) and Country of dispatch (KOMP-VERLD).

 

data appears in PO

data appears in tables EIKP and EIPO

data does not appear to be passed to KOMP.

 

Debugging the function module  ME_FILL_KOMP_PO, neither Import code number (KOMP-COIMP) or Country of dispatch (KOMP-VERLD) appear in the code. Does this mean the field assignment is elsewhere in pricing?

 

Cheers

Philip

↧
Search

Purchasing conditions - limited to specific conditions?

March 4, 2016, 5:35 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I want to customize the automatically adjustment of purchasing orders after a condition has been updated. However, I am wondering if I can make the settings for all conditions or is it limited to a number of conditions? What about Z-conditions?

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. Konditionen Tabelle.png

My ZPR1 is not listed in transaction OWV2 which need to be filled according to note 1819416.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. OWV2.png


Furthermore, according the note states that I have to select the condition table (SPRO "control purchasing document"), but how do I know which table is the right? there is no option to select (f4)


Is anyone having a detailled customizing guideline how to make the settings?


Thanks for your help, Sofie

↧
↧

GR/GI slip cannot set auto check to print for movement type 643

February 24, 2016, 9:15 pm
$
0
0

Dear Gurus

 

I'm trying to immediate print the collective slip for Goods Issue which is created against of PO during delivery for movement type 643.But its not working.

 

I check the condition records in MN21, condition record is in place.

I check in OMJ4, all in place with immediate 'check'

I check in NACR/MN21, condition record is Medium = 1, Dispatch time = 4

 

Parameter ID ND9, the parameter value already in place

Parameter ID NDR = X

 

But it's working for movement type 311 and 313

 

Please Advise,

 

Regards,

liyana

↧

PR have been approved even purchase group and plant belong to different company code

February 25, 2016, 11:30 pm
$
0
0

Hi SAP Consultants,

 

A PR have been approved even entered purchase group and plant belong to different company code.  Have searched about this but a forum says that purchase group is independent of company code.  Can I ask what should I check to troubleshoot this one?

 

Thanks and regards,

Jeremiah Dollente

↧

Setting stock to Zero

March 4, 2016, 6:10 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

Having some troubles with stock adjustment.  I have 5 EA of one material and want to set the stock to 0. I use MI01, MI04 and MI07

 

I select the plant and storage location and material in MI01 and save. I go to MI04 and cick the ZC checkbox and save. When I go to MI07 I expect to see -5 Difference qty but ot shows 0.000 and after I post the doc stock remains 5 EA. 

 

What am I missing?

 

Many thanks in advance.
Rado

↧

SHD0 - Transaction Variant & Screen Variant mismatch

March 3, 2016, 5:37 am
$
0
0

Dear Expert,

 

I created transaction variant in SHD0 for T-code MIRO for displaying qty and value fields (grayed out). At the same time system has generated screen variant automatically in background and assigned a screen number and program name.

 

Surprisingly when I test (F8) the transaction variant, it wont work and value and qty are still editable but when I test screen variant, the objective is met i.e. fields are disabled.  I need to assign this transaction variant to users but its not working for customized transaction too.

 

I have browsed hundreds of thread for this but could not find suitable thread related to this. Hope you can help for this.

 

best regards,

Munawwar

↧
↧

Issue on Purchase order

March 4, 2016, 5:20 pm
$
0
0

Hi Team,

 

We have an issue with purchase order status. Below are the details.

 

We have two line items in the purchase order, out of which one line item is marked for deletion. Post deleting, GR has been done.

 

But when we check the status of the PO, in PO search, it is showing as still open.

 

Please be informed that PO search is a webdynpro component. Also delivery completed indicator is also set for the line item for which GR is done.

 

 

Note: It is happening only with the Purchase orders of which any line item/items are marked for deletion.

 

Please advise.

 

Regards

Sesha

↧

view authorisation restriction for request for quotation document

March 4, 2016, 8:41 am
$
0
0

Hello experts,


I searched a lot in net for the below requirement but could not find the required solution.

 

 

 

I have a requirement to allow display and change authorization of RFQ (Quotation - ME41) document to either the creator of RFQ or approver of RFQ document. The possible ways of display could be

 

1. ME43, ME42,ME47,ME49 etc

2. Through PR document ME53n, ME54N, ME55,ME5a,MR5K etc

3. Through PO document ME22N,ME23N,ME29N,ME28,ME2L,ME2n,ME2m, ME2K etc

4. Through GR an IR documents

 

 

 

Please let me know how the requirement can be handled.

 

 

 

Thanks in advance.

↧
Search

LSMW - Batch Input session not created for certain users

February 29, 2016, 6:21 am
$
0
0

Hi Everyone,

 

We have LSMW file for a specific project. If we try to complete all the steps then it is not generating batch session at the last step for certain user Ids where as it is working fine for User ID with higher privilages. Hence this seems to be an authorization issue.

 

But we could not track anything through SU53 and by enabling ST01 trace. Kindly assist.

 

 

Session created for User 1                                                                                          No session created for User 2

 

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. User1.PNGImage may be NSFW.
Clik here to view. test1.PNG

 

Regards,

Jegan Raj

↧

WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE_2 Automatic Creation of Serial Numbers?

March 5, 2016, 5:01 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I was using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE to make GR for inbound delivery but now I changed it to WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE_2.

With the first BAPI, there was a parameter to create serial numbers automatically, for the second one I couldn't find any.

 

Is it possible to create serial numbers automatically with WS_DELIVERY_UPDATE_2?

 

Thanks.

↧
↧

Why the POs report with delivery date activated shows less orders?

March 5, 2016, 9:28 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I am running ME2N (by Purchasing Group, ALV, WE101) and it gives me a complete list of all my purchase orders with open quantities.

 

Neverteless, it does not bring the delivery date.

 

When I push the button to have this info, a lot of orders previously listed do not appear anymore.

 

Does any one knows why it happens?

 

Thanks in advance and best regards!

 

Márcio Rafael Reis

↧

PO and IV : GR based IV

March 2, 2016, 6:03 am
$
0
0

Dear all,

 

Please how can i customize the system in order to automatically propose PO quantity in the Invoice Verifacation MIRO, even if i've already posted GR ?

 

Example :

 

PO Qty = 1000

GR Qty = 900

 

 

MIRO should propose 1000 instead of 900.

 

 

I've tried with GR based IV option but in vain.

 

Thanks a lot

↧

Restrict MM02 views in transaction variant SHD0

March 2, 2016, 5:49 am
$
0
0

Hello, is there any chance to restrict material views while creating MM02 variant in SHD0?

I would like to restrict it only to the MRP1 view where only one field (MARC/EISBE) need to be edited.

I was not able to set it up as for TC_VIEW I can only make it all invisible or all visible, there is no option to choose it view by view?

Restricting via auth obj M_MATE_STA with STATM D is not the way for other reasons.

Thanks for any hint.

 

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.

↧
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>