Hello,
I'm a manager at a growing company which utilizes SAP for our purchasing functions and am looking for some feedback regarding purchasing expectations. Specifically, what is a reasonable numbers of purchase orders/ purchase lines that can be executed in SAP on a monthly basis by an employee? To further qualify, please factor in time for order acknowledgements, price adjustments, etc.. This individual would be responsible for those items as well.
Thank you very much,
Michael
Hi,
I want to make a report on Restricted and Un restricted Stock in BI.I am acheiveing this by field Stock Type.Stock Type A is Unrestricted and Stock Type E is restricited,however one more field Stock Type D is also coming in my data.So i want to know what to do with this Stock Type D.Will this come in Unrestricted Stock or Restricted Stock?
The link below descibes stock type:
Differences btw. 0STOCKCAT / 0STOCKTYPE in 2LIS_03_BF (BSTTYP/BSTAUS)
How do i create new blend batch using two or more diffrent batches of same material?
Hi,
Pls. help me with below mentioned requirement.
I want to fine out the Import Duty% maintained for respective PO's(Bulk PO's). Pls suggest the table in which I can find out po wise or any other way to find it out
-- Dharmendhar TCS
Hi SDN,
I am not a MM consultant (I am a finance user) so I hope to get some clarification from your bright minds 
Our requirement is pretty much that of a classic subcontracting scenario in SAP wherein we purchase packaging material from Vendor A after which we send it to Vendor B to consume. Lastly, GR the Finished Good from Vendor B.
Here are what we currently do:
1. Place a PO to the vendor with item category L. This item category causes the system to automatically derive the processing components required for the FG.
2. The PO price covers only the FG cost, excluding the packaging. This is the price that we pay to the vendor. The PO is saved and sent.
3. We transfer the packaging material from our warehouse to the "stock at subcontractor", movement type 541.
4. When the packed material is delivered home, we report the goods receipt on the PO above. This causes the stock of the packaging material at the subcontractor to be reduced (issued) automatically using mvt type 543.
5. The vendor invoice which is posted with the reference to the PO above covers only the cost of the FG, excluding the packaging material.
We are currently valuating all materials using standard price.
This currently results in undervalued Finished Good inventory (it excludes the packaging material cost). If we are to increase the cost estimate of the FG, this will result in massive PPV due to the difference between the cost estimate (includes packaging cost) and purchase price (does not include packaging cost)
Any suggestions you can think of to get around this?
If we want MRP to take into account a minimum lotsize for a consignment material, where do we need to maintain this? Is this in standard qty in PIR or better in min lotsize in MM? For example ,if I have a minimum lotsize of 50pcs and the muq is 10, what is best practice?
thanks,
Hello Experts,
We have a requirement where users need to enter batch characteristics of batch managed materials at the time of creating a requisition so that approvers of the requisition can take a look at the classification of the items that are being requisitioned. Please let me know if this is possible and how.
Thanks for your help.
Hi All,
I'm looking for a way to autofill some values in the sales and accounting views in the MM01/MM02 screens based on the material group entered.
After searching the net I already found these enhancement points:
The problem with the enhancement points found is that they allow me to modify some values on MARA level, but not on MBEW or MARC.
I've searched quite a while but couldn't find other exist that would allow this.
Two questions to the guru's out there:
Thanks in advance!
Erik
Hi Experts,
We have a requirement by which the GR label is to be excluded for printing for specific storage location. To give an example, lets say:
Plant : 1000
Storage Locations: 0001, 0002, 0003
GR label is to be printed when GR is posted for Storage location 0001, 0002 and even without storage location. Say for Indirect Purchases. But it should not print when GR is posted for storage location 0003.
One way to stop printing label is 'Do not select' Print Indicator while posting GR. But am looking for configuration options, by which I can stop triggering the condition record when GR is posted for Storage Location 0003.
Request your inputs please.
Thanks!!
Surya
Hi Experts,
We are trying to reverse inter company document using transaction FBU8(document has been posted through MIRO) but getting error message:
Message no. F5496.
I have set already re set the cleared item which was created, but still not able to reverse the document(getting same error message. One more point which I have observed is that, intercompany document was posted in FY 2015 and now reversal has been made in year 2016(could this cause issue for reversal).
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Ruchika
When I use the transaction code MIGO for transfer special stock
between
projects, the system have been displayed this error message.
This scenario, is about the special stock in Project System (WBS) and
we
used also the equipment in CS for control serial number in this
material
with Split valuation.
The material master is not relevant for the accounting.
Exist the integration between these components FI-AA and CS just for
modify, and I showed in this picture here.
Exist the integration between these components FI-AA and CS just for
modify, and I show in this picture down. The account document does not
use the G/L by asset, just the expense accounts.
My comment it is about this key account ANL in transaction code OBYD,
because the asset does not exist yet, for this, the error is inappropriate for this scenario.
I have tested the many scenarios, like that
1. With the material master is not used valuation values, similar
UNBW.
2. With the WBS did not do actual settlement.
The account determination behind this OBYD in this error, is
impossible
the edit new entries, because that I supposed this error is
inappropiate.
Hi,
I am following the thread A Document On Auto PO process to create an Auto PO process.
I have created material and Vendor master data.
I am getting the error ' Vendor is not extended to plant XXXX' while creating Outline agreement in ME31K.
Please check the attached screen shots for vendor data and error in ME31K.
Best Regards,
Siddappa
Dear,
We are in rental process with serial number.
1. The material is in stock with value updating and .
2. When the serial number is asigned to contract SD, it is transfered the material to asset fixed (MVT 241)
3. When it expires the rental contract, this material return to stock (transfer asset fixed to material).
In the third process is the problem, because the asset fixed have depreciation and we do transfer to material (MVT 242), the material have 0 value and it would impact in the moving average price.
Any solutions?
Thanks,
Regards
I have currently uploaded Commodity codes that are neede when creating Purchase Order in Item >Import Tab. There is also an Import Code field (EIPO-COIMP) below and there is just one value uploaded perhaps by accident. Requirement was just to upload Commodity codes, and I Import code no. to leave blank. No the 'list'exists with only one value. How can that be deleted?
Regards
Hi all,
I am having a concern no to create a warning message to warn a buyer that a specific material (based on Purchasing Group assigned to it) is procured from an X vendor when Reservation for that material is being created. It is helpful to manage purchasing process further. Does that solution need programming or can be done just by customizing? I could not find any other information apart form one telling how to switch between Error and Warning message and it is quite urgent.
Regards
Hi,
I configured the DW - Tolerance Key as shown below
Created PO as shown below
Invoice verification
as per the formula - Net order price by (quantity invoiced + total quantity invoiced so far)
Net order price = 100 USD
quantity invoiced = 1
total quantity invoiced so far = 0
Formula = 100 * (1 + 0 )
Total = 100 USD
As per the above shown tolerance limit set for 100 USD. I would expect to see no warning message, but system is throwing the below warning message.
I did not do the GR. But as per the tolerance limit. It should have allowed to post the invoice without blocking. Am I right?
Can you please let me know what I am missing here.
Thanks & Regards
Shan
Hi,
when i post Goods Receipt against PO or Inbound delivery, My Inbound delivery status (under status overview tab - Total Goods Movement status and Item level goods movement status ) is not getting udpated to "C". (originally it was blank). Reason for the behaviour is, in config under confirmation control settings, "GR Assignment Ind" is not set for my confirmation control.
I understand that this status will be updated only when the "GR Assignment ind" is set, but since the inbound deliveries are appearing as open and coming up in the VL06I report, we would want to close all those deliveries. Is there any way we can close the deliveries (update the status to "C"). Did anyone come across this scenario?
Note: I have already tried the below reports/note and it is not working.
Z_COMPLETE_INBOUND_DELIVERY - This is SAP provided report, but this one is not udpatign the status
RVDELSTA - This report only set the status to "A' but i want to set status as "C"
SHIP_DELIVERY_COMPLETE - This report is not picking my deliveries
Regards,
Prabu
Hi friends,
I am using MM17 for for uploading BIN in plant storage location view.
I am getting following error
"
The material cannot be maintained since no maintainable data transferred
Message no. MG160
Diagnosis
You wanted to maintain an existing material master record as follows:
o By changing it
However, you have not yet maintained the material master record for
the organizational levels and data fields specified, or user
departments selected. You can therefore process this data only in
Create mode.
o By extending it
However, you have already fully created the material master record
for the organizational levels and data fields specified, or user
departments selected. You can therefore process this data only in
Change mode.
In both cases, this message can appear if there is no maintainable user
department left. This occurs if you have not set the Check required
fields indicator when transferring data (program RMDATIND). Although the
absence of an entry in required fields does not then necessarily result
in an error, the number of maintainable user departments is reduced
accordingly.
"
I have already extended plant storage location view for material.
I am able to update BIN in MM02
For other view, MM17 is working fine only for Plant storage location 1 its not updating
Please Help
Dear expert,
I found some Schedule Agreement GR Qty have exceed scheduled qty, these SA have Kanban Indicator,
so, we do GR via T-code PJWE with JIT Calls. My question is that in the standard system is there a control point for this?
Thanks a lot in advance!
Hi Experts,
We failed to have GI against STO to bring it's batch number from the DN it belonged to.
We use Stock Transport Order with Delivery and Billing Document procedure, and 2 steps for receiving plant, which means 103 with 105.
Can someone guided us where we should check to make the receiving plant with the batch number from the DN directly?
Our batch level is currently material level.
regards,
Steven