Hi,
I am getting following error
Maintenance status of field MARA-HNDLCODE does not correspond to status of screen K
Regards,
P@M
↧
Error : Maintenance status of field MARA-HNDLCODE does not correspond to status of screen K
↧
While changing Po - Purchase order contain faulty acct assignments
While changing the PO - We are getting the following message - Purchase order contain faulty acct assignments. Any thoughts. Thank you.
Regards
Irene
↧
↧
inventory count done in two sap
Hello,
With reference to discussion forum.. "http://scn.sap.com/thread/3686349", i open a new one for discussion. (Jurgen .. thanks!)
Actually, I am encountered this error is because I would like to design a process to allow using standard SAP inventory transactions to perform movement of 701 to 708. Let me show you the background.
I am developing an interface for two SAP ECC6 reside in two diffrerent company entities. When company ABC completed stock count and posting the differences in their SAP ECC6, we only transfer the stock quantity difference posting to company XYZ via the interface with all the related parameter and pass into the interface and call BAPI to either MIGO, MB** transaction to perform the posting to ensure stock quantity match bwtween two systems.
I tried the following three methods and all failed because of error message "Check table 150F: entry X does not exist". (method 1: MB11, Method 2: MIGO, method 3: new movement copy refer 701 to 708 and post using MB11 and MIGO).. all failed see blow.
Now, I am thinking of another design method which is, instead of only posting the quantity difference (i.e. MI07) into company XYZ, all the physical inventory document and the entered quantity also need to transfer to interface and posted into company XYZ when transaction MI01, MI04 are posted in company ABC (offcouse MI07 will need to post in XYZ in final part).
Question:
1 - Do you think this will avoid the error message?
2 - Do you think this is a good design and will work?
Thanks and regards,
Tuff
↧
Partial delivery in VL10D
Dear Gurus,
We are having the following problem. We have a shell program that creates deliveries for STO's by calling trs VL10D in the background. There's no problem when the stock is sufficient. But when there's no enough stock, VL10D refuses to create a delivery, saying that "only X pieces of material A are available".
We want the system to deliver the available quantity. When the user runs VL10D manually, this is not a problem, because s/he can just change the quantity on VL10D screen before proceeding to delivery generation, but this doesn't seem to be possible in CALL TRANSACTION.
Hence my question. Is it possible to let the system create a partial delivery in VL10D automatically? I have already checked the customer master ("max. no. deliveries" = 9 and "partial deliveries" = space, i.e. no restriction). I have also tried setting the avail. check rule = C (Delivery proposal) in the IMG option "Define Default Settings" under Avail. check (table TVTA).
Nothing helps.
If you don't see a possibility to let VL10D create partial delivery for the available quantity, maybe you know other way of creating deliveries for STO's by a program? Any BAPI or something?
TIA
Raf
↧
PO rate change issue inbetween MIGO & MIRO
Dear Sir,
When PO was created Net price was 10 Rs. MIGO was done with 103,105 Qty 10. In between MIGO & MIRO the Net price of the same PO was updated from Rs.10 to Rs.12. Now when we are doing MIRO system is picking new value i.e. 12 Rs. We want MIRO tobe done with old rate only.
The base amt. field in MIRO screen has been locked for the end user, hence he cannot change the base amt. manually.
Is there any enhancement or standard customization needs to be done?
Kindly suggest solution on this case as we want to do MIRO with old rate only (by which MIGO was done)
Regards,
Mahesh
↧
↧
Price adoption: Not if price entered manually
Hello Jurgen,
I am raking up this thread again now because I do not understand the role of this radio button very well.
After all, irrespective of the radio button checked, while creating the PO, if I enter a net price or a condition value manually, it will always be retained.
In the following screenshot, I enter the values enclosed in red and press ENTER key.
System has picked up the price from the last PO and popultaed the same (highlighted in yellow).
Now, either before or after pressing the enter, if I wish to enter a net price manually, I see the system definitely accepts it. Then what is the effect of this radio button?
Regards
P.R
↧
Account determination for Non-Valuated material
Hi Experts
We have defined the material types as Non-valuated for which no value is maintained but the quantity is maintained at inventory.
The finance department maintaining different GL account for each Non-valuated material types. So the client is complaining to default the GL account in PR & PO creation.
As there is no accounting view for Non-valuated material we can't determine the GL account automatically using valuation class. Also as we are using the material numbers for Non-Valuated materials we can't determine the GL account by material group (Entry eids without material master).
In ME51N / ME21N, Shall we default the GL account in account assignment tab based on the material type of the material in each line item by using the ABAP development. Will there be any impacts if we default the GL account by ABAP developments.
The client is not convinced to enter the GL account manually. So please give your suggestion to solve this issue.
Regards
Harshini
↧
Cross company code stock transfer using purchase order
Hi Team,
I have created two company codes 5000 and 5005 and then assigned the plants 5000 and 5005 to company code respectively.
Here my supplying plant is 5005 and receiving plant is 5000.
Also I have created a vendor 1000 with account group 0007 and assigned the supplying plant 5005 to it.
1. How do we assign sales and distribution (SD) organizational units to the supplying plant?
2. Whether we have to create customer master (using Tcode XD01) for the supplying plant?
3. While creating the customer master, the company code and sales area (sales organization, distribution channel, division) must be of supplying company code / plant?
4. Whether we have to create customer master for receiving plant?
5. While assigning the customer master to plant, which sales area info (sales organization, distribution channel, division) has to give?
Please give the detail from customer master creation and assigning it to plant.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Shyjith
↧
issues on cross-company stock transfer triggered by sales order
Hi, friends:
As our business process required, we need to make the cross-company sale between to plants under two company codes.
The business process required is different from standard inter-company billing in SAP SD module. Our business process is as follows:
sales order --> PR --> PO --> cross-company stock transfer --> delivery to customer --> billing.
However, there is a difficulty in this process of make-to-stock production method. When we use schedule line item in SO to trigger the PO, there is a must to assign "account assignment category" in PO. This indicator is unchangable in PO by manual. When post goods recepit against the PO, there is no stock quantity udpate in un-restricted stock. By the way, I selected "C" in the "account assignment category" of schedule line item cofiguration.
Checked the MM documents, I found it seemed like only two results of PGR against PO with account assignment category. One result of PGR is directly consumpted by receiptent or unloading point. The other result of PGR is updating sepecial stock. For example, I've fullfilled the process for make-to-order production method, the stocks are specified for sales order.
In our requiremnt, we have to post to normal un-restricted stock for the following ATP in sales order.
Could any friend give some suggestion on this issue?
Thanks!
Justin
↧
↧
Assets such as tools and tackles how can issued to subcontractor in sap mm
Assets such as tools and tackles are issued to the sub contractor for performing the jobs. On completion of job, they are returned. This process is to be through SAP so that, it becomes clear the location of assets (which vendor) as well as whether they are returned after use.
↧
PO output getting triggered sometimes but not everytime
Hi Experts
We have come across an issue in which a customized PO message output is not getting triggered in some cases.
We have checked the condition records and did not find any discrepancy.
We also looked for any particular timings or trends but could not get anywhere.
Any suggests are welcome. Please advise.
Thanks
Harsh Aggarwal
↧
What should be standard list for material Group and Material Type
What should be standard list for material Group and Material Type
↧
MRP to generate account assignment STO, possible?
Dear Experts,
Our situation is :
PO created in plant : 3000 (central WM)
STO created from plant 3000 to plant 1000, but this type of STO is consumption STO, stock will be debited to account in STO.
We want to trigger MRP to generate this type of STR automatically. Is it possible?
Thank you
Janey
↧
↧
Query on Advanced Return Management for Supplier Returns
Hello All,
I have gone through the following help document of SAP with regards to Supplier Returns on Advanced Return Management
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_06/helpdata/en/66/6259fa030b4b959991a99b45e85e00/frameset.htm
As per the help document the Advanced Return Order triggers the return PO followed by the Delivery to the vendor and invoice verification, I have the following queries
If the vendor repairs the stock and sends the stock back to us or if he sends a replacement material to us can we create the goods receipt on the same Return PO? please advice
Kind Regards
Atul
↧
I am getting an error while creating vendor - define screen layout for company code.
I am getting an error while creating vendor - define screen layout for company code. Please help
↧
"Price change allowed" Check box in Service PO grayed out
Hi Experts,
I am new to MM. I am trying to do the settings for service PO so that the gross price can be changed at SES level. In order to meet this requirement I have made settings in SPRO -> MM -> External Service Management -> Define screen layout -> 4. Purchase order--> price and value fields--> price change allowed as optional..
After this setting I am able to see the "Price Change allowed" column in PO under the service tab. However it is grayed out and I am unable to set the check box.
Am i missing on any settings? Please help.
Thanks
Regards,
DDP
↧
The company code is not fully maintained - M3150
I am getting this error while creating a material for my new company code.
↧
↧
" Inconsistency in classification data => transaction terminated "
Dear All
I am getting ''Inconsistency in classification data => transaction terminated'' error while reversing the GR& Mat Doc which are posted twice for the same Item & the batch when the system is slow& now shows system shows -ve stock . Pls let me know the reason & solution ,
Thanks & regards
Chalapathi T
↧
Freight should be calculated in GRN w.r.t Std cost
Hello team,
In my business, price control in raw material (ROH ) is S
I am creating purchase order with below details......
Materal - XXXX
Qty -1
Price - 100 $
& material standard price is also 100 $
In my purchase order fright is 5 % on material standard cost i.e. 5 $.
Now i am changing material standard cost to 110 $ ( this activity occurs once in year). & old PO is still open.
For Old PO , system should calculate freight against new standard cost i.e. 5 % of 110 $ = 5.5 $
Also i don t want to change this PO but this should calculate automatically in GRN.
Is there any way to have this settings in MIGO ? can we make ZMIGO transaction by giving this logic?
Please suggest.
Prashant Keluskar
↧
request for not displaying Quality Inspection Stock in md04
Dear,
The planners’ request is to take into account the Quality Inspection Stock during the MRP run, (as in standard) but not to display the stock in the md04 screen. (so subtract the Quality Inspection Stock Qty to the total stock Quantity. )
I found this requirement was strange in a sense that the mrp result were not in line with the display of the qties in the md04 screen.
Anyway, would you think this might be feasible with badi ‘MD_DISPLAY_ELEMENT’ ?
(btw: In the selection rule that we use ‘Selection of QM inspection lots’ is set to be on ‘do not consider’ and still these are taken into account., do you also a comment on this?)
Best regards,
Frederik
↧