Hello All,
Is there any-way to prevent creating quotation or purchase order from unreleased RFQ ? I've checked release indicators and it's correct but the system allows creating Q/PO from the unreleased RFQ!
Could anyone help me please ? , even if with a coding solution
Thanks
Hi,
In my client there is no movement type 836 set. How can I make update the OMJJ with this movement?
Should I apply some sap note or update by program ... can anyone help me?
Tks.
Madi
Hello Guys:
We came with an issue in UAT with client. I will explain my problem as under
Principal Vendor A...Goods Costs =1000 USD ..Transport cost chargeable to Vendor A=100
Insurance Cost=100 Chargeable to Vendor B
For above we created a PO, did GRN and when going to invoice verification in MIRO , user is selecting option 3 in Miro which is Goods/Services+Planned Del Costs for posting main vendor invoice for Goods cost 1000 and Transport cost 100 making total value of invoice 1100, however when i see in items section of MIRO i see that system is also picking the line items of Insurance cost which were to be charged to Vendor B and upon simulation system is posting the whole amount of 1200 USD to Vendor A which is wrong. Though we have an option of selecting Planned delivery cost but what if user gets one invoice for 1100 from Vendor A for Goods and planned del costs, system should not behave like. this. Is there any way to avoid this from happening ?
Thanks
Hi all ,
I've faced a strange problem during initial stock upload with 501 mvt. type by MB1C t.code ...
it display ICPL business area is not defined .
Now , the thing is that - ICPL business area has been deleted and already, created a new business area and maintained all necessary setting and assignment with respective sales area ...
My query is - if the previous business area (ICPL) has already deleted , then why it's showing in a " error message " ? ...
reagards ,
patel .
Message was edited by: Jürgen L
Hello ,
When I do a Goods Reciept with 101 , 107 or 109 . In the present situation two documents gets triggered for printing
1. Material Document
2. Label Print
I have requirement , in which I have to print material document when I do GR with 107 , for my PO . However , I dont want the system to print label for those material .
And then when I release the same PO from the blocked stock , or when I do 109 for the PO , I dont want system to print Material Document , I want it to print only label .
It would be great , if I can get to know how to do . Is it checking the print control or some settings in NACE or I have to use some user exit and write a routine into it .
Presently the setting is -: Attached Image .
If I alter the setting here for the keys from 1-->6 , it would have effect on both the material document as well the label print.
Please guide me through
If you needed to migrate master data - specifically Material Master Data from a Microsoft Dynamics system into our ECC 6.0 system how would you proceed? Are there pre-written solutions? Has anyone ever done this ? We own Data Services but i am not sure if there is something already written to do this work. It seems like someone else should have moved from Dynamics to SAP already.
Hello,
We have alternate option of not creating PO and just send the recursive material to vendor using Mvt 541 and use report
MBLB to track the material at vendor , and take back to stock with Mvt 542(No taxation scenario) , once repaired and received.
We are using valuation types for material for identification of faulty and repaired material.
Thanks,
Ankush
Hi Experts
We have come across an issue in which a customized PO message output is not getting triggered in some cases.
We have checked the condition records and did not find any discrepancy.
We also looked for any particular timings or trends but could not get anywhere.
Any suggests are welcome. Please advise.
Thanks
Harsh Aggarwal
Hi Experts:
We are trying to posting the inventory Difference ( Tx. MI07) reducing inventory (movement 702) using serial numbers with valuation type ( NEW ) appears the next messages:
".Stock data of serial number 7000008025 not suitable for movement (Message no. IO231)".
"Serial number 7000008025 cannot be used here (IO201)"
I checked the data on tx. IQ09 and the combination material-serial number exists.
The system status from the serial number is ESTO
We're in SAP ECC 6.00
Any ideas???
Hi all,
We have a requirement of deleting inbound deliveries. I am trying to delete them using VL32N but I am getting error as follows:
Purchase order XXXXXXXXXX item 00010 does
exist. Item ignored.
It seems that the purchase order with whose reference inbound was created, is archived now. Hence I am not able to go to change mode of delivery.
The Goods movement status of delivery is not relevant. I read somewhere, that if the delivery status is changed to C then the delivery can be archived. Hence I changed the status of delivery to C through T-code VL_COMPLETE. Now I can enter delivery in change mode but cant delete the delivery because it contains handling units.
I had our archiving team checked if these can be archived directly, but it seems that these deliveries did not reach Residence team, hence these cannot be archived.
Please help, how should I delete/archive these deliveries.
Thanks and Regards,
Krishna Bharadwaj.
I am having two different Purchase orders having all the fields same except plant.
Here the issue is that for one PO amount is capturing as 0,08 and for the other amount is fetching as 18,00.
as we can see in Case 1 variant factor is 1 hence 0,08*1=0,08 whereas for Case 2 variant factor is 225 hence 0,08*225=18.
Please let me know from where does the variant factor fetched in a variant and how we can change it.
On what fields it is dependent on?
Hello,
In PR as soon as I enter a cost center K in account assignment category of PR line item, Fields 'Valuation price' and 'quantity' are getting disabled.
Release strategy is also triggered soon after it.
Later checking the release indicators we found that the changeability indicator is '4: Changeable, new release in case of new strat. or val. change.'
Why a release strategy is triggered that I understand.
But please let me know what is the reason behind the fields 'valuation price' and 'quantity' getting disabled. I have not saved the PR document yet.
Thanks.
Hi my name is sagar (Material Management)
I am trying to make PR but it gives an error - Enter rate EUR/INR rate type M for 10.12.2014 in the system setting.
Message SG-105
Please help me for this error.
Thanks,
Sagar
Hi
I want to prepare a report which should display open Purchase Order quantity according to latest delivery date.
I explain with a example.
Say a material has 3 Purchase Orders with delivery date as 1st June,15th June and 20th June.Then system should pick the Purchase Order with delivery date as 1st June and it should dislay the quantity which is yet to be delivered,means there is possibility that GR has already been done for some of the quantity.
To summarize the report should pick the latest Purchase Quantity and display the quantity yet to be delivered.Can anybody let me kow the Tables to be refered fro the same.
Regards
Vaibhav Mahajan
Hi there,
Unfortunately, SAP mentioned in some notes that you always should use the transporttool to transfer changes/updates in calendars to Production client. Even a small update, like adding a new holiday, you should transport it from Development to Quality and then Production. Unfortunately you can only transport "everything" , that means all calendars all rules etcetera will be transported everytime
.
What problem do I have with it:
Suppose you are orded to transport a small change to production. You know everything will be transported. You change it first in DEV, the question / Problem is, How can you be sure that you don't transport temporary trials of other people who has changed something in a calendar of DEV as well?
The only way to avoid transporting "****/test" from others, to me is to check the contents of all tables related to Calendars
:
So can anybody tell me how to check that the contents of all underlaying tables are equal in DEV, QAS and PRD, before I make the change, to avoid the problem mentioned above? and
How can I be sure that after the check when doing my change, somebody else is doing the same before I release the transport?
Some remarkt to that:
Regards Kees
Hello,
I need to launch a workflow for approval a vendor invoice when it is parked in the transaction MIR7. I was doing in the method CHANGE_AT_SAVE of an implementation of the BADI INVOICE_UPDATE. However, if the invoice was previously parked and the fiscal year is changed, the document number will change but it is not available on this method yet.
Then, I changed the launch of the workflow to the method CHANGE_BEFORE_UPDATE of the same BADI. Here, the new document number exists, however when I launch the WF it takes status ERROR and I guess it is due to the new invoice is not saved yet in the table RBKP.
Please, do you know any badi or user that is run just after the invoice is saved in the RBKP table as parked?
Thank you in advance.
Best regards.
Hi, we are using MR21 for revaluating a material. When we did the good receipt, it has this properties:
It had batch, valuation type,Account Assignment Category Q and WBS Element,
After that we processed MR21 but we didnt get a FI document:
Do you why is this happening?
We need to revaluate this material.
thaaanks !!
I have an issue where an order was PGI'd while the remaining HU's were being packed on another pack station. I tried to reverse PGI but am not able to nor can I remove the HU's.
Dear all,
is it possible to bring out the international version screen when booking the one-time vendor invoice?
Thanks and regards
Hi,
I've been stuck with this for quite sometime now and hope someone here can help me. The issue is that the Quantity reduced field in the PO(item confirmations tab) is wrongly updated after a Inbound delivery.
Steps:
1. PO created for 100 PC.
2. Confirmation AB: Order acknowledgement 80 PC
3. VL31n: Inbound notification 80 PC.
4. In PO, LA shipping notification is updated automatically
Why does the Quantity reduced(MRP) field in Confirmations tab show 60 and not 80?
Is this wrong or have I misunderstood this field? I've tried this out in multiple systems so this isnt a config issue i guess. Is there a sap note to be implemented? I've looked at notes note 0001568985, 1163183 and 1162167 and they dont seem to work.
Thanks for the feedback.
Regards
Richard
