Hi,
I am in need of help.
When I perform the migo, vendor evaluation is Performed According to the delivery date.
Is There the possibility of using as parameter the date document of Migo?
All other points are parameterized OK.
Could help me?
Thanks.
↧
Maintain Vendor Evaluation
↧
HU Move MVT 311
Hi everybody,
do somebody know if it's possible to move a HU from a non-hu managed storage location to hu managed storage location without to create a delivery?
I don't wanna use the HUMO or VLMOVE. When I use the MB11 I get an inbound delivery. So I am looking for a non-delivery-solution.
My HU had a qty of 50000 pcs before I transferd it to a non-hu-managed storage location. Now I wanna move it back to a hu managed storage location with a qty of 25.000 pcs.
Hope somebody can help.
Regards
Danny
↧
↧
Vendor master extension to new co. code & pur org.
Hi Friends,
I want to have lsmw for Vendor master extension to new co. code & pur org. As LFA1 data is already there so can I avoide passing this data through source file while using program RFBIKR00 in lsmw. Can we extend purchasing view also using program RFBIKR00 in lsmw.
Thanks,
Kiran
↧
Auto creation/deletion of requirements
--we are receiving process orders directly into our main Plant A
and then automatically transferring the Inspection Lot quantity to a subsequent plant B
based on the entry of a specific receiving storage location within Plant A (Sloc DC)
--This process is working well for us, with the exception that the Planning Team is currently required to manually create/delete material requirements in Plant B, since MRP does not automatically recognize the requirements
-- The work request is for the requirement to be automatically created in Plant B
when the PO/Process Order is created referencing receiving storage location DC
and for the requirement to be automatically deleted upon receipt of the process order.
Any suggestions on how to achieve this will be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
↧
PO net value should differ from valuation and MIRO expectation
Problem: a poor vendor caused 'damage'. But instead of making a credit note, we agreed he'll give a discount for future orders. BUT.... this discount should go a cost center, and should NOT impact the material valuation (moving average). The net value he sees on the PO should be reduced by the discount. Can I do this (without programming)? If yes - how?
Some investigation makes me think that:
* If I configure a condition as an accrual, it's not taken into the net value of the PO (Not OK) and does not influence the valuation (OK). But MIRO seems to expect the net value (NOK).
* If I do not set the condition as accrual, the net value is reduced (OK) but then also the valuation is changed instead of getting a posting to a cost center (NOK). MIRO expects the right value (OK).
SOS....
↧
↧
stock balance report w/ batch#
experts,
i have a business requirement for stock balance report (similar to MB5B) for values against the batch numbers for that period.
we already have a similar custom report but it totals the value for a given period- I would like to bifurcate the value w.r.t batch#
thanks in advance for your advise.
thanks,
Coolio.
↧
MRP create schedule line because of an order on the substitution date
Hello all,
I read this forum since few years and always found something to help me, but this time, nothing.
I have 2 AC in substitution
AC1 (old AC)
Follow up date : 13.03.2015 to AC2
Planning Calendar : W02
Minimum lot size : 50.000
Safety Day : 1 Day
AC2 (new AC)
Planning Calendar : M01
no Safety Day
As you can see there is a ScheduleLine placed before the substitution.
But why ?
DepReq on 13.03.2015 must consume all the AC, and after it's the new AC to be consume no ?
We have do a lot of tests and if we move the substitution date to 1 day before or after, calcul seems to be correct. Same thing if we remove the safety day on AC1
↧
Number of accounting document lines posting from MM to FI
Hi experts
I want to perform an analysis of the maximum number of accounting lines created by GRs in FI. Actually we have an interface with an in-house purchasing application. POs/ GRs are first created in that purchasing application and then updated in SAP through the interface. I want to know which POs or GRs are posting the highest number of line items in FI.
Could you please let me know which table/ approach should I target to get that data (at times line items are hundreds so I can't afford to download all data in Excel first and then analyze.
Thanks
↧
'Print price' condition control of PO
Hi Friends,
I have dveloped new document type for the purchase order. I have created PO with this new doc type here in condition control tab ' Print Price' is getting by default tick. If I use document type NB with same other data then ' Print Price' is by default unticked. I want to make this ' Print Price' untick for the new document type. How can I do this.
Thanks,
Kiran
↧
↧
NFe Creation for SLoc to SLoc Stock Transfer Movement Type
Hi Everyone,
I have a business requirement to create a new movement type based on standard movement type 311, but a Nota Fiscal needs to be generated with reference to the Material Document. The problem is that both storage locations are part of the same plant and same business place. They are not in the same physical location and require a Nota Fiscal. Is this possible? If so, what steps can I take to achieve this?
I have configured the new movement type and have maintained the Nota Fiscal Category Derivation for my new movement type. I can post the document in MB1B with no errors and the material document looks correct, but no NFE is generated. I can't enable NFE Issue Within Same Business Place since both locations are under the same plant.
851 X I5 2 B WE (I'm not sure how to maintain the NF P Type and Part.func. but I have tried several combinations)
↧
Following mandatory roles missing in partner maintenance:PI
Hi Everyone,
we have maintained all the required partner roles in vendor master which are mandatory and also checked the partner schema related to the account group and vendor, but while creating a PO only PI partner roles are missing in partners tab which was made mandatory entry and we are getting a warning message, we are trying to find out the solution for not getting the warning message, can any body please help us.
FYI: we always create a vendor under company code level and we have checked each and every post specified in SCN.SAP.COM related to this warning message and found everything given as solution are maintained in our system as well. Please specify your suggestions so that we can rectify the issue and fix it as early as possible.
with regards,
Chiranjeevi
↧
User defined LIS - switch drill-down
Dear All,
I've created an LIS called S931 which i copied it from S031. I've also updated S931 with history data and everything goes fine ..
Then we copied MC.5 report to ZMC5. And we replaced s031 with S931. ( there was a problem on database level with S031 so we copied everything to find a temporary solution)
When i run ZMC5, it shows values on monthly basis.. I hit "switch drill-down" button. There are two options "MRP Type" and "Month".
But in MC.5 itshows "Plant, Valuatiın Class, Material, Division, Material Group... etc".
I did check the user-settings and add some other characteristic. But still it shows only "MRP Type" and "Month" .
Is there a problem with the settings of S931 ? What may be the probem ?
Best regards,
↧
Different expense value during multiple GRN
Dear Experts,
We will be receiving items from vendor in different shipments. For each shipment the expense value changes and vendor Cost + expense should be loaded to inventory after GRN.
Example: PO created for item A.
Item A Quantity -> 1000
Transportation expense -> 100 $
Transportation Vendor -> V1
First shipment received on 01.10.2014 for 250 qty
Shipment 1 details:
Quantity received -> 250
Transportation expense -> 100 $
Transportation vendor -> V1
Shipment 2 Details:
Quantity Received -> 300
Transportation Expense -> 150$
Transportation Vendor -> V2
Shipment 3 Details:
Quantity Received -> 450
Transportation Expense -> 250$
Transportation Vendor -> V3
Vendor cost + Expense value should be loaded to inventory after GRN.
What process to be followed
Thanks & Regards
Ranjit
↧
↧
Insert PO in 541 to reservation in MB1B
Hi Gurus,
I have a problem when I make a good movement with 541 O by MB1B.
I posted a reservation by MB21 with good movement 541, then I needed to post a 541 O movement by MB1B to reservation with indication of a PO.
I have in customizing set in OMBW the field EBELN as optional entry, but when I tried to post the document by MB1B to reservation, the system not displays this field.
How can I do?
Thanks
Nik
↧
PR to PO Conversion from APO
Hi All,
We have an issue in converting the PR to PO from APO - Error message that we get is the Standard Error "Unknown Account assignment is not used here" Error Message No ME069. As per the SAP notes it says that we cannot create a PO without Item category with Unknown account assignment "U". But in the foreground we were able to create a PO from PR using ME21N for ZNB Document type but when we call through APO its throwing the error Message.
I tried various options but not able to see what could be the reason.
Dear Moderator - Request you to please not to filter this message consider Standard SAP error but need some help explicitly as other discussions in the blog was not much of help.Thanks.
regards,
Karthick
↧
packaging information for individual case of finished goods -needs EDI
I am not even sure where to post this question. We are configuring the first retail arm of our business to come onto SAP. One of the EDI customer invoicing requirements is to not only give the number of cases shipped on a delivery but also to say how many boxes are in one case and the net weight of one box within the case. They do not multiply this info by number of cases shipped. We assume we can do this in the material master possibly but have no idea what other companies do to satisfy this need or what fields they use. U/M conversion would kind of make sense but for both these fields? And then I assume these fields will not automatically appear in any IDoc for the shipment?
↧
Deletion of MM invoices parked in the previous fiscal year
Hi experts
I have a scenario wherein company's fiscal year is Jan-Dec both for FI and MM. 2013 was company's first annual closing in SAP when there were numerous parked invoices in MM. When they entered in the new fiscal year (2014) and tried to process those parked invoices (Change or Post), SAP deleted these parked invoices and recreated the same in new fiscal year with new document numbering range which was in place for the 2014 fiscal year.
In my previous company the year was Jul-Jun for FI and Jan-Dec for Logistics so never faced this issue. Also, it was part of the closing checklist to not leave any pending parked documents at the time of annual closing.
I want to understand if this deletion and recreation of MM documents is SAP standard and where can I get some material about it to be prepared in advance as 2014 fiscal year closing is near.
Cheers
↧
↧
Link between MC.9 report and MVER (Material Consumption) table ?
Hello All,
In one of our project, we are migrating material consumption history data from a plant (Say plant A) to plant (Say plant B), we are doing the following,
1) Extracting entries from MVER table for plant A which is the source plant
2) Inserting them in MVER using a function module for plant B which is the target plant
3) Same material is extended in plant A and in plant B
4) The migrated entries from plant A are then shown in the consumption tab of material master header in plant B
Now the problem is that when we try and run the report MC.9 for material for which we migrated entries in MVER table from plant A to plant B, it does not show the consumption history for plant B, it shows for plant A.
We had assumed that only migrating MVER table data would solve the problem of not losing material consumption history in plant A, however in plant B MC.9 report does not work as it works in plant A.
Is there a link between MC.9 and MVER table ? If yes what all material data we need to migrate ? We want to close plant A, as it is shutting down and move all history data to plant B, however it should also show in MC.9.
Any help inputs, past experience or alternative approach suggestions would really be appreciated.
PS: I am a PP/QM consultant, however I have best tried to explain this problem, which I believe is MM related 
Best Regards,
Ameya B.
↧
Final Invoice indicator on PO and Invoice (MIRO)
Dear experts,
We have an issue for below scenario :
The PO is a Framework Order with account assignment category as "network" and a specific service material group. The vendor is invoiced fully via MIRO but the Final invoice indicator on both PO and invoice is not set. Due to this, the project linked to this network cannot be closed. It's expecting the final invoice indicator on the PO is set. There is no standard config for automatically setting this flag during MIRO or by default for certain type of account assignment category.
Currently, I am thinking of two options.
1) During MIRO- find a BADI which can be used to set this flag on both PO and Invoice based on the specific acct assignment cat and material group. If anyone has any experience with the BADI please let me know the badi name and if this is feasible option and if any negative impact.
2) During PO creation, set this flag on ONLY PO by default based on the specific acct assignment cat and material group. Is there any specific user exit for the same? Also if this option is better than the first one and if any negative impact.
For both above options, is there any concern of just setting the flag on PO and not on invoice. Also I read some blogs about this indicator and archiving. Does PO an/or Invoice archiving process look for these flags to be set in order to pick up for archiving?
Thanks,
DK
↧
Special condition type header
Hello ,
In my PO I have two materials and one service; I want to add a condition type at header for the tow materials and no service.
Exampl;
My condition type header is : ZRB6 (freight charges) = 1000 euros
Material number 1 : 4444, purchase price = 1000 euros
Material number2 : 5555, purchase price = 400 euros
Service number : 1234 Price = 100 euros
When I add My condition type ZRB6 at PO header the system restart the price (condition type ) at the three , materials and service and the purchase price will for Material number 1 = 1666.66 euros and Material number 1 = 666.66 euros and service = 166.66 euros , in my case I want the system restart the freight charges (rule three ) at the tow materials only and no service.
Knowing that ; the tow materials is piece parts “material type is ( ZREC) “ and service is presentation service “material type is ( ZSER)”.
Please help.
Omar.
↧