Quantcast
Channel: SCN : All Content - SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live

MM invoice verification against delivery with no Good Receipts - will it work ?

$
0
0

Dear all,

 

Let me quickly explained my issue.

 

We have moved to INcoterms FCA, meaning that property transfer is taken when goods are loaded at the vendor site.

 

No transportation module is implemented. We create an inbounds delivery when receiving info from carrier. And later on, we are receiving against it. Transport module is not implemented.

 

But we need to post invoice before the Goofs is physically received because of long transportation time.

 

My questions - I guess it is basic, I am not a MM expert - far from it -

 

1) Will it be possible to post the invoice against the delivery without the good being physically  received.

2) Property of the goods is not yet transfered before receiving - despite the incoterm- Well,  I guess so - how the financial posting will work when creating the invoice.

 

Many thanks for your help.

 

regards,

 

Pierre Mikael


Best Practice for Goods Receipts (Inbound Delivery)

$
0
0

Hello All,

 

Our organization has been struggling to understand the best practice for receiving in inbound deliveries(ASNs). As a result we see inbound deliveries in MD04 that have been completed but still show as MRP relevant. I can only imagine this is due to a faulty business process. I have implemented a note which corrects faulty inbound deliveries with returns (ZCORR_EKESMENGE). Recently we have an inbound delivery completely processed without a return which is hanging out in MD04 even through there has been a GR performed.

 

For quite a long time we used both MIGO_GR, VL32N, and VL06I to receive in ASNs. Recently we moved to using only VL32N to receive in ASNs, however we still use transactions like MIGO and MBST for returns/reversals. I have even seen some config to use the automotive function, even other transactions like VL60P. A recent SAP document I ran into had the following literature:

 

Make absolutely sure that you do not mix up the goods receipt process for inbound

delivery (for example, transaction VL32N) with the functions you already know, such

as goods receipt (post) for unknown purchase order (transaction MBOA/MIGO), or

cancellation of the goods receipt (transaction VL09 as opposed to MBST/MB0A).

You must organize your tasks in such a way that the goods receipt posting is only

executed using one of the two ways described.

 

This statement also made consider whether or not we have fully grasped the SAP recommended process for receiving inbound deliveries. My questions to to everyone on the forum is, what are you currently using and do you have a process document you can share? We recently upgraded our instances from 4.7 to ECC6 with support package SAP_APPL 605. Currently most of our business is in the automotive sector.

Inbound delivery document flow

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

I am creating an inbound delivery with reference to a PO.  The issue is that I do not see the PO in the document flow.

 

Can you please help?  We would like to see the PO in the document flow of the inbound delivery.

 

Thanks,

Vitish.

Cross-plant CM field in Material master

$
0
0

Hil

 

How to remove the data in Cross-plant CM field in Material master basic data 2 view

 

Table: MARA- SATNR

 

Also unable to remove the indicator

 

Thanks

MM

LSMW error

$
0
0

While doing LSMW for MM01 it throws error like this 'no batch input data for screen SAPLMGMM 0080'

can anybody help me out in this issue?

 

Regards,

Anand

Subcontract PO - Not able to change child components

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I am faced with the following situation :

 

I have created a BOM in CS01 transaction for the parent material .

Now I am creating a subcontract PO ( Item category L ) in  ME21N.

Here I go to the " Material Data " tab of item details --------> Components.

Now, I would like to change the child material that has been populated from the BOM. Ie I want to use a child material that is different from what is given in the BOM. However, the "Materials" field is greyed out and I am unable to change it. 

But in some other similar scenario, I am able to change the material from the "Components" in the subcontract PO. I am sure that I am missing out some setting somewhere that is responsible for greying out the "Materials" field in the "Components" section of the PO, whereas isn some other case, it is allowing us to change. So, which setting am I missing ?

 

Regards

Sathya

Not possible to determine account for sales order or project stock

$
0
0


Hello,

 

I am trying to create PO with account assigmnet E and gettinng the error:

 

Not possible to determine account for sales order or project stock ME558

 

I have alresy check the:

 

1. Account assigmnet category (E) and account modyfication VKA assign to this catergory

2, I have checked the obyc: CASA GBB 0001 VKA Y010 602000003

 

When creating PO the accout is determine (seems it is working from OBYC) but I have still ME558 error?

 

Any help welcome

Regards

M.

Update prices in ME21N (purchase order)

$
0
0

Hi,

 

We need to re-calculate prices automatically when creating or modifying a purchase order taking into account changes in some pricing fields of the order.

User has the standard option of updating the prices in 'condition' tab selecting the option he needs but what we need is to do this automatically if user changes some fields in the order.

 

Does anybody know if we have the same functionality as we have in SD in exit 'FORM userexit_new_pricing_vbap/vbkd' with the function 'new_pricing' in MM or how can we solve this issue?

 

Thanks in advance,

 

Best regards,

 

Silvia,


STO restrcit for few plants

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

My client have requiremnt that at the time of po creation with those plant , it should be restrict and at the time of entering data pop u should be come with message.

         For all plant purchase organisations are same.

       If i am not clear with my requirment please let me know.

 

Thanks in advance,

Deep.

How to hide the user interface dialog in ME21N?

$
0
0

Dear MM experts

 

I m new to SAP mm module. Eeverytime I go to ME21N, there will be a user interface window shows up. then I have to manually click the close button. Is there any method to set this as default? no showing this interface anymore? Do I have maintain any user parameter? which one?

 

Thanks!

 

T.P

DD.png

Service Activity Number changed

$
0
0

While creating service Purchase Order with reference to service purchase requisition, user change the service activity number adopted from the purchase requisition. How to restrict this.

Error in account coding allocation

$
0
0

Hello All,

We are in R3 4.70.

I am trying to create a SES for line item 2 and the system prompts an error as per the subject bar.

For the same account assignment and G/L account details however I could post the line item1.

The only difference in the line items looks as the Order Nos being different PM orders .

 

Can any body give clue as to what needs to be corrected pls?

 

Regards,

Nagarajan

 

Error in account coding allocation

Error in account coding allocation Message no. SE508 in creation of SES

$
0
0

Hello guys, merry christmas.

 

We are creating a Service Entry Sheet (SES) from the transaction ML81N in reference to a Purchase Order. After selecting the service position 1 through the button Serv. Selection system gives the following message error: u201CError in account coding llocation - Message no. SE508u201D

 

The error happened last December 2008 and March 2009 and opened an OSS note, SAP have answered that there is an inconsistency in the table ESKL, for it sent me a program that detects the inconsistency in the table and whitens the "LOEKZ" generated by the inconsistency and the program corrects the inconsistency.

 

Were checked SAP OSS notes: 666314, 611563,  1087090 and  809317 and all are referring to that error occurs when the user exit has activated EXIT_SAPLMLSK_001, but not our case since we do not have activated.

 

I have OSS and open many messages like can not see the inconsistency of the table. I even made the same steps of the users and do not generate the error. We are seeing the error is random. These are the steps involving the process:

 

1. Go to ML81N

2. PO = 470000XXXX, item 1.

3. Posting XX.XX.2009

4. Push the botom Serv. Selection

5. Select line 1

6. Push botom Services

 

Appers the error "Error in account coding allocation"

 

Error Message Number: SE508

Transaction: ML81N

Tables: EKPO, ESLL, ESKL

 

I wonder if anyone has had this error on your system.

 

Our SAP version is 4.7 Enteprise ext. 200 Win / Ora.

 

I appreciate any help I can guide

 

Desirée C.

Happy New Year 2010 !

 

Language error

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

we are getting error while creating the PO though we have maintain the language English in Material master data as English still we are facing the problem  we have already searched in forum and also try that method but still the issues is not solved ,

 

we have also tried in change MM02 Additional data tab language EN .once its saved again when we check again language will be different .

 

we are trying in search in forum from past two weeks we tried all the methods but still issues is not resolved kindly help and advice please.

 

thanks

 

No short text maintained in language  EN

 

Message no ME095

 

Diagnosis

 

no materiel shot text (short description ) has been maintained in language EN

 

system response

no short text can be adopted from the materiel master record

 

procedure

 

if  a material is to  be procured from a vendor different language the material short text

During material to material transfer system asking for price difference account pry (material ledger is activated)

$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

  When i am doing material to material transfer system is asking for price difference account pry. Both materials are material ledger activated with transaction based price determination. The sending material is 300001143 and receiving material is 800000116. please find the accounting views of sending material  in three  periods. the receiving material also is valuated with moving average price with valuation class 3054 and price in all three periods is zero with zero stock.   I want to know how the system Calculated the moving average price and giving account determination error:No account for valuation class 3054 with transacation key pry. Sending material valuation class is 3050 and recieving material valuation class is 3054.


Special Stock table and F.01

$
0
0

Dear All,

 

I have 1 inventory GL Account but all the inventory transactions are using "special stock".

I want to know are there any special stock tables that have material summary which have amount and quantity, but the amount of summary have the same amount with the GL Account?


for example : from table S039 i can get the summary of inventory that have same amount with the GL Account, but the problem it can't for special stock



Thanks,

Ferry

Please reconcile source list records

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I have looked into SDN forum before posting this error message. I have a source list with 4 different vendors and i want to add a new vendor, i'm able to do it manually through ME01 without any issue. There is only one fixed vendor out of the total 5 vendors.

 

The problem is when i'm trying to move the source list to other client with the IDoc is failing and the reason being "Please reconcile source list records"

I don't understand why it is throwing such error.

 

Satya

Contract cannt be created without reference of PR

$
0
0

Hi,

 

Can we put restriction that contract can't be created without Purchase requisition in MK31K transaction code.

 

I tried with field selection and combination of field selection and document type , where Purchase requisition is required entry, however system is not restricting it in posting contract.

 

Thanks & Regards

Sudhansu

ME2L screen change after version upgrade.

$
0
0

Hi All,

 

We are currently going through a version upgrade.( ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0; AFS 5.0 to AFS 6.5)  In ME2L report I can't see the descriptions of below fields.

AFS_SIZE

AFS_SCAT

 

In old version I can see the descriptions.

AFS Dimension

AFS Stock Category

 

What can be the reason? Please advice.

 

Regards,

Jeewana

impact of open physical inventory documents

$
0
0

Hi,

Recently I found in MI22, there were lot of open physical inventory documents in the previous period,

can I delete it in MI02 being all were from previous period?

Does it will have any effect on my inventory or any process further if I leave them as it is? what is best practice to use?

 

Thanks

Viewing all 6446 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images